12.07.2015 Views

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On the Sacred Disease 73Laskaris <strong>and</strong> Jouanna prefer to keep the other reading . Accordingto Jouanna, the author in the course of his argument develops the notionof prophasis in the sense of external catalyst (‘cause déclenchante due auxfacteurs extérieurs’) <strong>and</strong> in the end distinguishes it from that of phusis, thenatural cause or ‘law’ determining the development of the disease (‘causenaturelle et lois de développement de la maladie’). He concludes that thereis no contradiction, since both external causal factors <strong>and</strong> the internal ‘nature’of the disease are subject to the same natural laws <strong>and</strong> therefore divine(‘Il n’y a aucune contradiction selon l’auteur entre une maladie divine àcause de sa phusis ou à cause de sa prophasis. Tout cela est de l’ordre dudivin dans la mesure où tous ces phénomènes obéissent à des lois naturellesqui sont les mêmes aussi bien à l’extérieur de l’homme qu’en l’homme, loisqui sont indépendantes de l’intervention humaine’ (2003, 130–1)). I stillthink that this does not fully address the problems I raise in my discussionof this passage <strong>and</strong> reads too many elements in the text which are not explicitlystated (e.g. the notion of ‘natural law’), although I concede, as I didin my original paper, that my suggestion to read is not free fromdifficulties either.I have discussed the relationship between On the Sacred Disease <strong>and</strong> Airs,Waters, Places in van der Eijk (1991), arriving at the view that there is noreason to believe that the two treatises are by different authors; similarconclusions have been arrived at (apparently independently) by Bruun(1997); see also Jouanna (1996) 71–3 <strong>and</strong> (2003) lxx–lxxiv. I have discussedthe similar structure of the argumentation in On the Sacred Disease <strong>and</strong>in Aristotle’s On Divination in Sleep in van der Eijk (1994) 294–5 (see alsoHankinson (1998c) making a similar point). I have dealt at greater lengthwith the religious beliefs of the author of On Regimen in van der Eijk(2004a).On the question of ‘the divine’ in other Hippocratic treatises seeLichtenthaeler (1992) onPrognostic, <strong>and</strong> Flemming <strong>and</strong> Hanson (1998)on Diseases of Young Women.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!