12.07.2015 Views

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

216 Aristotle <strong>and</strong> his schoolthe animal kingdom, in particular for his philosophical anthropology, <strong>and</strong>to what extent the description of these bodily structures <strong>and</strong> processes isguided by teleological concerns. However, such a study would have to takeinto account the different levels of explanation on which Aristotle is at workin various contexts as well as the types of context in which Aristotle expresseshimself on these issues. The following typology of contexts (which doesnot claim to be exhaustive) would seem helpful:(1) First, there are contexts in which Aristotle explains the bodily structureswith a view to their suitability for thefulfilment of the psychic functions in which they are involved, for example,when he describes the structure of the human h<strong>and</strong> by reference to thepurpose it is intended to serve, 35 or man’s upright position with a view toman’s rational nature. 36 This is because he believes that a purely materialdescription of the bodily structures would be just as insufficient as a purelyformal description of soul functions, because it ignores the suitability ofthese structures for the exercise of the powers for the sake of which theyexist <strong>and</strong> with a view to which they are shaped. As G. E. R. Lloyd summarises:‘whenever he is dealing with an instrumental part that is directlyconcerned with one of the major faculties of the soul identified in the Deanima, Aristotle cannot fail to bear in mind precisely that that is the functionthat the part serves, <strong>and</strong> he will indeed see the activities in question asthe final causes of the parts’. 37 However, as Lloyd himself recognises, thisis just one of several concerns Aristotle has in the zoological works, <strong>and</strong> itis not consistently implemented.(2) Secondly, there are contexts in which the ‘mechanics’ of psychicprocesses are discussed in physiological terms. Thus in his explanationsof memory, recollection, sleeping <strong>and</strong> dreaming, Aristotle goes into great(though not always clear) physiological detail to describe the bodily partsinvolved in these ‘psychic’ activities <strong>and</strong> the physical processes that accompanythem (e.g. the discussion of the ‘bodily imprints’ in memory, 38 or ofthe ‘reactivation’ of sense-movements in sleep due to the withdrawal of theblood). 39 As I have tried to show elsewhere, these discussions deal with operationsof the sensitive (<strong>and</strong> perhaps also the intellectual) part of the soulunder rather special circumstances, but they also have important implicationsfor the physiology of normal sense-perception (on which the relevantsections in On the Soul <strong>and</strong> On Sense Perception are rather uninformative). 4035 Part. an. 687 b 6ff. 36 Part. an. 686 a 27ff. (see below); cf. also IA 706 a 19.37 Lloyd (1992) 149. 38 Mem. 450 a 27ff. 39 Insomn. 459 b 7ff.; 461 b 11ff.40 See van der Eijk (1994) 75–87.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!