12.07.2015 Views

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

Medicine and philosophy - Classical Homeopathy Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Aristotle on sleep <strong>and</strong> dreams 175That is explicitly <strong>and</strong> emphatically the context of natural science: the theoreticalstudy of nature as Aristotle conceives it. They belong to a series oftreatises which are usually called Parva naturalia. Although this title doesnot originate from Aristotle but from the Middle Ages, it rightly indicatesthat psychology means for Aristotle psycho-physiology, an analysis both ofthe formal (‘mental’) <strong>and</strong> of the material (‘physical’) aspects of what itmeans for a natural entity to be a living being. 17 At the beginning of thisseries of treatises (which Aristotle seems to have conceived as a continuingdiscussion of connected topics), Aristotle says that he will be concernedwith the most important ‘activities <strong>and</strong> experiences’ of living beings (man,animals, plants), in particular with those that are ‘common to the soul <strong>and</strong>the body’: sense-perception, memory <strong>and</strong> recollection, sleep <strong>and</strong> waking,youth <strong>and</strong> old age, growth <strong>and</strong> decay, breathing, life <strong>and</strong> death, health <strong>and</strong>disease. These are, Aristotle says, the most important functions living beingscan realise or experience qua living beings, <strong>and</strong> it is for the purposeof these functions that the bodily structures such as described in History ofAnimals <strong>and</strong> Parts of Animals (<strong>and</strong> in the lost work On Plants) exist. TheParva naturalia are closely linked to Aristotle’s work On the Soul, <strong>and</strong> thepsycho-physiological explanation of dreams which Aristotle expounds inOn Dreams (<strong>and</strong> which, in the enumeration listed above, is subordinatedto <strong>and</strong> included in the discussion of sleeping <strong>and</strong> waking) heavily drawsupon Aristotle’s general theory of the soul, especially his views on senseperception,‘imagination’ (phantasia), <strong>and</strong> on the so-called ‘central sensefaculty’ (kurion aisthētērion). This context of the study of nature shouldmake clear from the outset that the interest taken by Aristotle in dreams isneither epistemological nor practical, hermeneutic or therapeutic – as it is,for example, in the Hippocratic work On Regimen quoted above, of whichAristotle was aware.Against this background, the questions Aristotle is pursuing in the threeworks in question make perfect sense. Thus in the preface to On Sleep <strong>and</strong>Waking (453 b 11–24), which in a way serves as an introduction to all three ofthe treatises, he says that he is going to consider whether sleeping <strong>and</strong> wakingare ‘peculiar to the soul’ or ‘common to soul <strong>and</strong> body’, <strong>and</strong>, if common toboth, what parts of soul <strong>and</strong> body are involved; whether sleep occurs in allliving beings or only in some; <strong>and</strong> through what cause (aitia) it occurs. 18Considering this psycho-physiological context, one would expect Aristotleto pay some attention to the question of the possibility of cognition17 On the structure <strong>and</strong> underlying rationale of the series of treatises assembled under the headingParva naturalia see van der Eijk (1994) 68–72; see also Morel (2000) 10–24 <strong>and</strong> (2002b).18 For a discussion of this ‘Preface’ see van der Eijk (1994) 68–72.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!