12.07.2015 Views

ocp192_en

ocp192_en

ocp192_en

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Programme implem<strong>en</strong>tationalmost twice as much as the initial budget of EUR 540 million by the <strong>en</strong>d of 2013. On a similar basis, EOPYY would havesp<strong>en</strong>t, about EUR 600 million in diagnostic tests by the <strong>en</strong>d of 2013, greatly above the budgeted EUR 370 million.Following a review of the developm<strong>en</strong>ts in the first half of 2013, the authorities have tak<strong>en</strong> action to address the lackof control over consumption and sp<strong>en</strong>ding of specific budget categories. In July 2013, the authorities adopted closermonitoring with both price and quantity control measures for diagnostic tests, physiotherapy and the use of private clinicsand hospitals. For example, e-prescription-type monitoring mechanisms have be<strong>en</strong> ext<strong>en</strong>ded to diagnostics and willsubsequ<strong>en</strong>tly be ext<strong>en</strong>ded to consultations and interv<strong>en</strong>tions by private facilities. Another measure refers to changes to theuse of diagnostic prescriptions (KENs) to pay private providers, with only one KEN per pati<strong>en</strong>t now being eligible.Authorities also plan to introduce guidelines for prescription of diagnostic tests, pre-authorisation of interv<strong>en</strong>tions andchanges in the way EOPYY contracts with private clinics and hospitals (e.g. considering closed/prospective budgets).The authorities have introduced a rebate on the sp<strong>en</strong>ding with private clinics and hospitals coupled with a legalsp<strong>en</strong>ding ceiling and a clawback mechanism on private providers for sp<strong>en</strong>ding on three categories: diagnostic tests,physiotherapy and the use of private clinics and hospitals. So far the authorities have calculated the amount of rebate andclawback on the basis of all the claims received for 2013 and have s<strong>en</strong>t the letters for the collection of the rebate andclawback for the first half of 2013. In addition, the authorities had planned to conduct ext<strong>en</strong>sive and detailed audit of all theclaims submitted since January 2013 with a view to id<strong>en</strong>tify and exclude unnecessary claims, eliminate fraud and recalculatesp<strong>en</strong>ding. The process has faced substantial delays, and the checking of the claims has only rec<strong>en</strong>tly started in March 2014.The aim is to finalise the auditing of all 2013 claims by June/July 2014. Lack of control, lack of guidelines and properreferrals may result in a non-negligible clawback amount. It is expected that the new measures and stricter control andauditing can help <strong>en</strong>suring that sp<strong>en</strong>ding stays within budget targets and reduce the effective clawback amount.In this context a number of policy priorities lay ahead. These include:• Paying off the remaining arrears not only to improve the financial position of health sector suppliers but also to improvethe negotiation power of EOPYY. Therefore, authorities need to explore options for a swifter checking and clearance ofexisting commitm<strong>en</strong>ts.• Improving invoicing, auditing and paym<strong>en</strong>t mechanisms in the sector betwe<strong>en</strong> providers, including public hospitals, andEOPYY.• Implem<strong>en</strong>ting a compreh<strong>en</strong>sive change to the curr<strong>en</strong>t resource allocation, budgeting and costing procedures to improveand clarify financial flows across the system.• Implem<strong>en</strong>ting the proposed stronger prescribing, monitoring and control mechanisms to help control consumption. Morebroadly, the existing business intellig<strong>en</strong>ce and monitoring unit at EOPYY needs to be further reinforced. This processshould be int<strong>en</strong>sified in coming months as part of the improvem<strong>en</strong>t in the organisational structure of EOPYY.3.2.8. Reforming the p<strong>en</strong>sions system71. Since 2010 substantial progress has be<strong>en</strong> achieved in the reform of the p<strong>en</strong>sion system butimportant chall<strong>en</strong>ges remain. The reforms of the main p<strong>en</strong>sion system have revised the mainparameters, added much needed transpar<strong>en</strong>cy to the system and put the system on a more sustainablepath. However, the main p<strong>en</strong>sion system remains highly fragm<strong>en</strong>ted, with four main funds and threesmaller funds, relies on increasing financing from state transfer to cover for existing deficits, andp<strong>en</strong>sion rules still differ greatly across differ<strong>en</strong>t categories of population with some elem<strong>en</strong>ts ofunfairness in the accrued b<strong>en</strong>efit remaining. There is a clear need for further rationalisation of thesystem.72. The 2012 reform of supplem<strong>en</strong>tary p<strong>en</strong>sions has still to be implem<strong>en</strong>ted in full. Important stepshave be<strong>en</strong> tak<strong>en</strong> with the adoption of the 4052/2012 Law and respective Ministerial Decree. The newlegislation revised the parameters and calculation of supplem<strong>en</strong>tary p<strong>en</strong>sions, introducing a newformula based on an actuarially-neutral calculation of p<strong>en</strong>sion b<strong>en</strong>efits (a "notional definedcontribution" system), topped up by a sustainability factor to guarantee the future sustainability of thesystem. Moreover, under the same Law, several funds under the Ministry of Labour have be<strong>en</strong> mergedinto a new single fund (ETEA). This simplified the overly fragm<strong>en</strong>ted system and introduced a betterlink betwe<strong>en</strong> contributions and b<strong>en</strong>efits. However, not all funds that fall under the ESA95 definition ofg<strong>en</strong>eral governm<strong>en</strong>t have yet be<strong>en</strong> merged into ETEA. Moreover, the authorities have failed to rebuildcontribution histories since 2001 for the calculation of the pro-rata as <strong>en</strong>visaged in the Law. As a result,the pro-rata calculation will now be done only as of 1 January 2014 and only for those funds that havebe<strong>en</strong> merged into ETEA. This will have implications for ETEA supplem<strong>en</strong>tary p<strong>en</strong>sions as of 2015 andfor the overall sp<strong>en</strong>ding for supplem<strong>en</strong>tary p<strong>en</strong>sions. Existing legislation needs to be adjusted in thecoming months to <strong>en</strong>sure the application of the new "notional defined contribution" formula, topped upby a sustainability factor, to all funds outside ETEA that are part of g<strong>en</strong>eral governm<strong>en</strong>t and to mergeall these funds into ETEA. The authorities have committed to <strong>en</strong>sure that the fiscal sustainability factor43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!