13.07.2015 Views

Asymmetric fluid-structure dynamics in nanoscale imprint lithography

Asymmetric fluid-structure dynamics in nanoscale imprint lithography

Asymmetric fluid-structure dynamics in nanoscale imprint lithography

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and the result is⎡ 12µ⎧τ = L⎢3 ⎨⎣ h ⎩23θDsec θ tanθ48h⎛ 2 ⎞6 6( ) ⎜θDsecθ h tanθ− + − ⎟5 5x x( x − x )+αβ⎜⎝30D5h4 4 C⎫⎤1 3 3 C22 2( x − x ) + ( x − x ) + ( x − x ) ⎥⎦⎛⎞⎜ h D C1tanθ+ ⎟[2.31]β αα β⎜⎟⎬β α⎝8 32µh⎠36µ⎭ 2⎟⎠βα2.4 THREE-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEM2.4.1 3D Pressure Distribution for Parallel, Rectangular PlatesIn the previous two-dimensional case, the plates were considered to be<strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite <strong>in</strong> the y direction. In the three-dimensional case, the plate dimensions aref<strong>in</strong>ite. For a flat, rectangular plate mov<strong>in</strong>g parallel towards a flat surface with<strong>fluid</strong> completely fill<strong>in</strong>g the gap, i.e. there is no capillary effect; the pressuredistribution <strong>in</strong> the squeeze film is relatively complex ow<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>troduction ofcorner effects and the absence of rotational symmetry. For a rectangular plate oflength L and width B where the shape ratio B/L gives a characteristic shapefactor, f ( B ), Hays assumed an <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite, double Fourier series solution for theLpressure distribution of the follow<strong>in</strong>g formwhere[ M , N = 1, 3, 5, ..., ∞],p =∑∑∞ ∞M Nπxθ =LAMNs<strong>in</strong> Mθ s<strong>in</strong> Nφ[2.32]πyandφ = [Moore 1965]. This satisfies theBzero boundary conditions such that the pressure is the same atmospheric pressure35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!