Asymmetric fluid-structure dynamics in nanoscale imprint lithography
Asymmetric fluid-structure dynamics in nanoscale imprint lithography
Asymmetric fluid-structure dynamics in nanoscale imprint lithography
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
and the result is⎡ 12µ⎧τ = L⎢3 ⎨⎣ h ⎩23θDsec θ tanθ48h⎛ 2 ⎞6 6( ) ⎜θDsecθ h tanθ− + − ⎟5 5x x( x − x )+αβ⎜⎝30D5h4 4 C⎫⎤1 3 3 C22 2( x − x ) + ( x − x ) + ( x − x ) ⎥⎦⎛⎞⎜ h D C1tanθ+ ⎟[2.31]β αα β⎜⎟⎬β α⎝8 32µh⎠36µ⎭ 2⎟⎠βα2.4 THREE-DIMENSIONAL PROBLEM2.4.1 3D Pressure Distribution for Parallel, Rectangular PlatesIn the previous two-dimensional case, the plates were considered to be<strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite <strong>in</strong> the y direction. In the three-dimensional case, the plate dimensions aref<strong>in</strong>ite. For a flat, rectangular plate mov<strong>in</strong>g parallel towards a flat surface with<strong>fluid</strong> completely fill<strong>in</strong>g the gap, i.e. there is no capillary effect; the pressuredistribution <strong>in</strong> the squeeze film is relatively complex ow<strong>in</strong>g to the <strong>in</strong>troduction ofcorner effects and the absence of rotational symmetry. For a rectangular plate oflength L and width B where the shape ratio B/L gives a characteristic shapefactor, f ( B ), Hays assumed an <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite, double Fourier series solution for theLpressure distribution of the follow<strong>in</strong>g formwhere[ M , N = 1, 3, 5, ..., ∞],p =∑∑∞ ∞M Nπxθ =LAMNs<strong>in</strong> Mθ s<strong>in</strong> Nφ[2.32]πyandφ = [Moore 1965]. This satisfies theBzero boundary conditions such that the pressure is the same atmospheric pressure35