13.07.2015 Views

enhancing food security and physical activity for maori, pacific and ...

enhancing food security and physical activity for maori, pacific and ...

enhancing food security and physical activity for maori, pacific and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Enhancing Food Security <strong>and</strong> Physical Activity <strong>for</strong> Māori, Pacific <strong>and</strong> Low-income Peoplesnot create a price premium, but rather ensure that healthier options are accessible to allconsumers. The government currently invests ~$134 million/year in <strong>food</strong> research. 24This research investment is primarily driven by economic motives, recognising theimportance of the <strong>food</strong> industry to the New Zeal<strong>and</strong> economy - over 50 percent of NewZeal<strong>and</strong>’s exports are <strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong> beverages. 25 Only five percent of the current researchinvestment is directly targeted at achieving health outcomes. 24 25 The Ministry ofResearch, Science <strong>and</strong> Technology is currently developing a roadmap <strong>for</strong> future <strong>food</strong>research. 26 The roadmap notes that this government research investment has a widerrole to play in supporting public health policy <strong>and</strong> decision-making. Integrating primarysector <strong>food</strong> research with a health research agenda should see more funding focused onnutrition-related health outcomes.A report <strong>for</strong> the Australian government on price determination in the <strong>food</strong> industryidentified five key determinants of the price of <strong>food</strong>. 27 These are supply <strong>and</strong> dem<strong>and</strong>conditions, trade, integration between producer <strong>and</strong> consumer throughout the <strong>food</strong>chain, use of technology <strong>and</strong> innovation, <strong>and</strong> product competition. It is noted that thecost of services such as transport, storage, distribution <strong>and</strong> retailing (which include ahigh labour input) make a greater contribution to the increasing cost of core grocery<strong>food</strong>s than the raw commodity. The cost of raw goods, however, usually benefits to agreater extent from improvements in technology than does the cost of services. 27 Thesetechnologies are often rapidly taken up by competitors <strong>and</strong> eventually lower the cost ofgoods. Whilst improving the cost of <strong>food</strong>, the introduction of new technologies couldpotentially have an unintended impact on <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> if they result in job loss.The impact of international trade on the cost of <strong>food</strong> is also important. Trade can impacton three areas: prices on overseas markets of products which are predominantlyexported determine the price on domestic markets <strong>and</strong> returns to producers; the price<strong>and</strong> market penetration of imported products determine the price that domestic productscan achieve; <strong>and</strong> world commodity prices <strong>for</strong> non-<strong>food</strong> items (such as commodities used27 18in packaging <strong>and</strong> transport) influences prices on the domestic market. Free tradecan increase the local year-round availability of <strong>food</strong> <strong>and</strong> exports create income whichcan positively impact on <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>. 28 Thus international trade can have both positive<strong>and</strong> negative effects on <strong>food</strong> cost.In summary, innovation at the primary production level can lead to improvements in thehealthiness of the <strong>food</strong> supply. Reorienting agricultural <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> research funding toalso consider health implications <strong>and</strong> af<strong>for</strong>dability would guide new development <strong>and</strong>initiatives towards those that provide benefits not just <strong>for</strong> industry, but <strong>for</strong> the consumer<strong>and</strong> society as a whole. There is definite potential <strong>for</strong> improvements in the cost <strong>and</strong>availability of healthy <strong>food</strong> through upstream initiatives. However, an importantconsideration when making changes at the primary production level is that the changesshould not lead to healthier <strong>food</strong>s only being available at a price premium.Midstream: Food processing <strong>and</strong> manufacturingThere are various factors that impact on type <strong>and</strong> composition of manufacturedproducts. 21 These include consumer dem<strong>and</strong>, input <strong>and</strong> processing costs, commoditysupport programmes/tariff policy, <strong>food</strong> safety requirements, government policy, <strong>and</strong>nutrition education <strong>and</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation policy. An example is the commodity supportprogramme in the US which pays a minimum price <strong>for</strong> certain crops. 29 Commoditysupport <strong>for</strong> corn led to oversupply <strong>and</strong> increased the use of corn oil <strong>and</strong> high fructosecorn syrup as cheap <strong>for</strong>ms of fat <strong>and</strong> sugar in <strong>food</strong> manufacturing.108

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!