13.07.2015 Views

enhancing food security and physical activity for maori, pacific and ...

enhancing food security and physical activity for maori, pacific and ...

enhancing food security and physical activity for maori, pacific and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Enhancing Food Security <strong>and</strong> Physical Activity <strong>for</strong> Māori, Pacific <strong>and</strong> Low-income PeoplesThose qualifying <strong>for</strong> the CSC include, as well as households receiving the mainbenefits <strong>and</strong> most NZ Superannuation recipients, Low-income earners <strong>and</strong> Family TaxCredit recipients (known as Family Support until 2005). The CSC criteria certainlyappear to cover most households likely to be <strong>food</strong>-insecure, even excluding NZSuperannuation recipients as in general not troubled by <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>. Almost bydefinition, households of low socio-economic status would generally qualify, <strong>and</strong>probably most households with persons of Māori or Pacific ethnicities.A third possibility is that a ‘Smart Card’ scheme should be available to all householdswith dependent children, providing a given quantum at frequent intervals perdependent child. A ‘dependent child’ is any child aged under 18 <strong>and</strong> not inemployment or on a special benefit. In effect, this means virtually every person agedless than 18. This third option is a ‘universal’ rather than ‘targeted’ benefit (apart frombeing targeted at households with children, <strong>and</strong> targeted also in the sense ofencouraging consumption of specific <strong>food</strong>stuffs), <strong>and</strong> has of course similarities to theuniversal Family Benefit of decades gone by. One advantage is its simplicity. Adisadvantage is the exclusion of low-income households without children. Its equityimplications are worth exploring further.Table 2.1.4 shows the implications in terms of the distribution of the benefit byhousehold income. The five quintiles (in terms of household income be<strong>for</strong>e tax) arefrom the 2006/07 Household Economic Survey. 17 The focus here is on specifiedhousehold types, with dependent children, namely ‘couple’ households with one, two,or three children; <strong>and</strong> one parent households with a dependent child or children s .Table 2.1.4: Distribution of the benefit by household incomeAnnual household income (1)Quintile BoundsariesUnder $25,800 to $44,900 to $68,000 to $98,000 <strong>and</strong>$25,800 $44,899 $67,999 $98,799 over NumberPercent of households in quintileAll QuintilesCouple with -- one dependent child 7.4 14.7 26.5 25.3 26.3 130,300- two dependent children 5.2 6.1 27.6 28.3 31.9 149,000- three+ dependent children 4.3 18.1 32.4 26.1 18.6 76,900One parent with dependent child(ren) only30.6 45.7 17.7 2.3 0.0 90,300Total Number of households 48,200 83,400 116,500 97,300 96,200 446,500in above categoriesAll Households Number 314,800 313,500 313,200 314,500 313,300 1,569,200Source:HES 2006/07 tables. Table 7. Statistics NZ(1) Income is be<strong>for</strong>e tax, from regular <strong>and</strong> recurring sources only. Income groups are quintiles(aggregated from Stats NZ deciles)s These household types do not include all dependent children, but do cover most.25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!