Enhancing Food Security <strong>and</strong> Physical Activity <strong>for</strong> Māori, Pacific <strong>and</strong> Low-income Peoplesboth projects the van drivers often ended up providing other health promotion, socialwork, <strong>and</strong> social support services to customers.The Braystone Project, a community intervention in Australia, evaluated provision of34 35mobile fruit <strong>and</strong> vegetable market stalls at public housing estates. Evaluationshowed that at two high-rise estates access to fruit <strong>and</strong> vegetables <strong>and</strong> socialconnectedness improved, but these findings were not replicated at two low-rise estates.Access to supermarketsAccess to supermarkets is often seen as important in the ability to access healthy <strong>food</strong>. 36Research with <strong>food</strong> bank users in Christchurch found that half used a car to dosupermarket shopping, <strong>and</strong> they did not necessarily shop at the closest supermarket. 37Without a car, <strong>food</strong> had to be carried home <strong>and</strong> participants had to shop locally at higherpriced outlets. In Glasgow, a <strong>food</strong> superstore was developed as part of a regenerationinitiative in a deprived area. 38 Assessment of the impacts on the community found30 percent of households surveyed switched to the new store, <strong>and</strong> two-thirds of thesewere households with a very low disposable income. Subsequent analysis showed thatmost of those who switched stores had previously shopped at similar stores outside thelocal area. 39 Thirty-nine percent of shoppers got to the store by walking, leading toincreased independence reaching the store. 38 However, no impact from having closeraccess to a supermarket was seen on fruit <strong>and</strong> vegetable consumption. An earlier studyin Leeds assessed a similar intervention. This study did observe an increase in fruit <strong>and</strong>vegetable intake in those switching to the new <strong>food</strong> store, although there was no controlsite as in the study in Glasgow. 39Lack of transport to undertake <strong>food</strong> shopping has been associated with <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong> in9 37 40-45many studies. The economic feasibility of providing a supermarket shuttle totransport shoppers to supermarkets was investigated in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia. 46 Although theresults are specific to the supermarket areas investigated <strong>and</strong> the assumptions made, itshowed that if 5 percent (n=181) of transit-dependent households used the shuttle, itwould break even in 16 months. 46 Such a system could be considered not just bysupermarkets, but by councils, in order to provide transport to established community orfarmers’ markets in low-income areas.DiscussionThe ENHANCE workshops proposed community/farmers’ markets or gardens <strong>and</strong>improved access to the <strong>food</strong> supply as important targets to improve <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> <strong>for</strong>Māori, Pacific, <strong>and</strong> low income families/whānau. Interventions suggested to improveaccess were community markets, mobile fruit <strong>and</strong> vegetable vendors, <strong>and</strong> providingtransport to stores. These suggestions fit within a Community Food Security framework.Community Food Security takes a wide view of <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> focuses on bothcommunities <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> production systems. It combines the issues of sustainable <strong>food</strong>production <strong>and</strong> <strong>food</strong> consumption, 47 <strong>and</strong> recognises them both as important in achieving<strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong>. Examples of some of the different Community Food Security initiatives areteaching vegetable gardening to low-income households, creating community <strong>food</strong>businesses, new bus routes linking low-income neighbourhoods with supermarkets,developing community gardens, <strong>and</strong> farmers’ markets. 48The literature review suggests that community gardens are well-liked by gardeners whouse them, <strong>and</strong> can have a positive effect on fruit <strong>and</strong> vegetable consumption, as well as91
Enhancing Food Security <strong>and</strong> Physical Activity <strong>for</strong> Māori, Pacific <strong>and</strong> Low-income Peoplesproviding social benefits to users. Community <strong>and</strong> farmers’ markets have potential toreach a larger audience than community gardens, <strong>and</strong> can also provide social benefits.Many focus on providing locally-grown produce. However, in order to improve access toaf<strong>for</strong>dable produce in low-income areas the markets must be appropriately located,operate at suitable times, <strong>and</strong> be appropriately targeted. An alternative option is to havethe produce delivered to consumers. Fruit <strong>and</strong> delivery boxes or mobile vendors are twopossible options which merit further investigation. Companies that deliver fruit <strong>and</strong>vegetable boxes already exist in New Zeal<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> it may be that providing subsidisedboxes <strong>for</strong> low-income households with lack of transport is an alternative option. Forthose with limited transport options a supermarket shuttle could be very useful. It islikely to be a win-win situation <strong>for</strong> supermarkets <strong>and</strong> shoppers, creating increasedpatronage from low-income shoppers.Recommendations• Support community gardens where there is community dem<strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> them.Alongside this, evaluation or research should be conducted to determine theirtrue impact on <strong>food</strong> <strong>security</strong> <strong>and</strong> nutrition.• Trial <strong>and</strong> evaluate community/farmers’ markets in low-income areas, along withconsideration of suitable transport options to attend markets.• Conduct economic analyses of supermarkets providing shuttles in low-incomeareas.• In some areas, if a community market is not feasible, subsidised fruit <strong>and</strong>vegetable delivery boxes or mobile vendors could be considered as analternative.References1. Maxwell S. Food <strong>security</strong>: A post-modern perspective. Food Policy 1996;21(2):155-170.2. Webb P, Coates J, Frongillo EA, Rogers BL, Swindale A, Bilinsky P. Measuringhousehold <strong>food</strong> in<strong>security</strong>: Why it's so important <strong>and</strong> yet so difficult to do. Journalof Nutrition 2006;136(5).3. Twiss J, Dickinson J, Duma S, Kleinman T, Paulsen H, Rilveria L. Communitygardens: lessons learned from Cali<strong>for</strong>nia healthy cities <strong>and</strong> communities.American Journal of Public Health 2003;93(9):1435.4. Twiss J, Dickinson J, Duma S, Kleinman T, Paulsen H, Rilveria L. Field action report.Community gardens: lessons learned from Cali<strong>for</strong>nia healthy cities <strong>and</strong>communities. American Journal of Public Health 2003;93(9):1435-8.5. Wakefield S, Yeudall F, Taron C, Reynolds J, Skinner A. Growing urban health:Community gardening in South-East Toronto. Health Promotion International2007;22(2):92-101.6. Enns J, Rose A, de Vries J, Hayes J. A seat at the table: resource guide <strong>for</strong> localgovernments to promote <strong>food</strong> secure communities. Vancouver: Provincial HealthServices Authority, June 2008.7. Kirkby RJ. Private gardens in public spaces - community gardening: the struggle toempower individuals <strong>and</strong> build community. Master of Science: Michigan StateUniversity, 2003.8. Stones M. Obama's veg plots point the way to healthy eating <strong>and</strong> more. FoodNavigator USA 30 March 2009.92