13.07.2015 Views

Pardee-CFLP-Remittances-TF-Report

Pardee-CFLP-Remittances-TF-Report

Pardee-CFLP-Remittances-TF-Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

According to the World Bank estimations, about 40 percent of conflict-affectedand post-conflict countries relapse into conflict within 10 years. Fragile andconflict-affected situations (FCS) are also responsible for increasing poverty anddeclining social conditions in many poor countries. To better address the needsof conflict-affected situations, the World Bank has recently emphasized the needfor a broader, more issues-based approach to conflict and fragility. Accordingto The World Development <strong>Report</strong> 2011: Conflict, Security and Development,the risk of violent conflict in a country or region stems from a combination ofinternal and external stresses with which the country lacks effective institutionalcapacity to cope. Weak state, market, and social institutions can therefore beseen as primary factors contributing to chronic unrest and violence. One of themain reasons of that fragility is the low priority frequently given to the rebuildingof national institutions. For peace and development to become sustainable,the existence of functioning and self-sustaining government systems becomescrucial: “The end of fighting does offer an opportunity to work towards lastingpeace, but that requires the establishment of viable institutions, capable ofensuring lasting security for the entire population” (Brahimi 2007). For rebuildingthe institutional infrastructure, strong partnerships of the international developmentcommunity with national and local stakeholders become particularlyurgent (Brahimi 2007).A significant shift in the international development discourse can therefore beobserved that affords increasing attention to sustainable institution-buildinginstead of mediating conflicts between distinct parties or adversaries for achievinglasting peace in conflict-affected areas. Focus on broader settings that canprovide security, justice, and economic sustenance to individuals and communitiesaffected in the crisis is reflected in the human security approach to postconflictdevelopment.Human Security as a New Paradigm for Post-ConflictDevelopmentHuman security has, in recent years, become a defining concept in many globalpolicy initiatives centering on post-conflict rehabilitation and peace-building. 4It emerged as an alternative paradigm in the multipolar world at the end of the4 The human security approach as a novel direction to development was first presented in the UNDP 1994Human Development <strong>Report</strong> that called for a broader interpretation of the concept of security which would takeinto account its people-centered character. Emphasizing the need for protection from both chronic and sudden disruptionsin people’s daily lives, the concept signified “a shift from security through armament to security throughsustainable human development” (Frerks and Goldewijk 2007, 26).10 A <strong>Pardee</strong> Center Task Force <strong>Report</strong> | October 2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!