Foreign TaxesUnder the 2012 regulation, remittance providers would have to disclose all taxesimposed on a remittance transfer, including taxes assessed by a local, state,provincial or regional foreign government. 80 In its 2013 rulemaking, the CFPBrecognized that the determination of all foreign taxes, and keeping that informationcurrent, would be a difficult and costly undertaking. It therefore determinedto amend the regulation to only require the disclosure of foreign taxes that are“collected on the remittance transfer by the provider.” 81The new regulatory language raises the question of whether a tax collected by apaying agent would be considered a tax collected by the remittance transfer provider.Generally, the actions of an agent are attributed to the principal, and thusa tax collected by the recipient’s institution could be viewed as a tax collected bythe remittance transfer provider, if the recipient’s institution is determined to bethe agent of the transfer provider. As discussed previously, the regulation doesnot provide a clear definition of the term “agent” or even the appropriate State orforeign law to consult. On the other hand, it is possible that the rule only intendsto capture taxes collected directly by the remittance transfer provider and not bythe provider’s agents. This is an area where additional guidance from the CFPBwould be helpful.Exchange RatesThe remittance regulation requires a remittance transfer provider to disclose theexchange rate used by the provider, rounded consistently for each currency tono fewer than two decimal places and no more than four decimal places. 82 The2013 regulation did not make any changes to this requirement.While the exchange rate may be determined with certainty for certain products,this is not true in all cases. In post-conflict countries there will likely be far morevolatility in the exchange rate than in more settled nations. To account for thisrisk, remittance companies may offer transfers with an exchange rate that isset when the recipient picks up the funds. 83 This would not be possible underthe regulation, since it requires disclosure of the exchange rate when transfer isinitiated.80 12 CFR § 1005.31.81 78 Fed. Reg. 30674—77.82 12 CFR § 1005.31(b)(1)(iv).83 77 Fed. Reg. 6196 (Feb. 7, 2012) (so called “floating rate” transfers are described).Remittance Flows to Post-Conflict States: Perspectives on Human Security and Development 55
Further, remittance transfers to post-conflict nations may rely on open networksystems. Determining the exchange rate in advance in open network transactionsis not always possible. 84 A sending institution may exchange the currencyat the time of transfer, using an exchange rate that the sending institution sets. Insuch cases, the principal amount will then be transferred in the foreign currency.Even if the funds are to be received in a foreign currency, however, the sendingfinancial institution may not conduct the foreign exchange itself. Some financialinstitutions, particularly smaller institutions, may not participate in any foreigncurrency markets. 85 In other cases, the sending institution may choose not totrade an illiquid currency or a consumer may request that the transfer be sent inU.S. dollars. In these cases, the first cross-border intermediary institution in therecipient’s country, or the recipient’s institution, may set the exchange rate thatapplies to the transfer. Under these conditions, the remittance company maynot know the exact exchange rate that will be applied until the transferred fundsare received.The potential for making an error of as little as one-hundredth of one percentwhen disclosing exchange rates could create significant risks to the remittanceprovider, especially when making a transfer to a post-conflict country. As aresult, the cost of such transfers may increase, or the availability of such servicesthrough regulated companies may be inhibited. 86 And once again, post-conflictnations will typically have more volatile movements in exchange rates, and,thus, will be particularly disadvantaged by strict application of this disclosurerequirement.Date When Funds Will Be AvailableThe receipt that must be given by the remittance transfer provider to the sendermust include the date in the foreign country on which funds will be availableto the designated recipient. 87 Due to the instability in post-conflict countries,remittance providers may not be able to provide a firm date by which the funds84 Id. At 6197.85 See discussion of the mechanics of setting foreign exchange rates at 77 Fed. Reg. 6197.86 Supra note 55 at 6220, a discussion of comments including a Federal Reserve Bank commenter, as well asindustry commenters, arguing that requiring a fixed exchange rate for purposes of providing an exchange ratedisclosure would result in less favorable exchange rates for senders. These commenters stated that if providers arerequired to fix the exchange rate, they will increase the spread they use in order to minimize the risks associatedwith rate volatility, so the cost of sending remittance transfers would increase for senders. A major remittancetransfer provider warned the CFPB that it would stop providing service to approximately 10,000 foreign locationsthat currently offer only floating rates.87 12 CFR 1005.31(b)(2).56 A <strong>Pardee</strong> Center Task Force <strong>Report</strong> | October 2013
- Page 1 and 2:
Pardee Center TASK FORCE Report oct
- Page 3 and 4:
This series of papers, Pardee Cente
- Page 5 and 6:
AcknowledgementsThis Task Force on
- Page 7 and 8:
ITU International Telecommunication
- Page 9 and 10:
networks and migrant associations i
- Page 11 and 12: to developing countries than other
- Page 13 and 14: But most importantly, remittances a
- Page 15 and 16: often mix in the countries of desti
- Page 17 and 18: According to the World Bank estimat
- Page 19 and 20: Because of its focus on the multidi
- Page 21 and 22: eceiving remittances provides an en
- Page 23 and 24: associations for post-conflict inst
- Page 25 and 26: are proposed to avoid the associate
- Page 27 and 28: Terry, D. 2005. Remittances as a De
- Page 29 and 30: oader approach to post-conflict rem
- Page 31 and 32: networks can be seen as “homogeno
- Page 33 and 34: That personalized nature of hawala
- Page 35 and 36: Customary law (xeer) and other trad
- Page 37 and 38: the world (Lindley 2009, 531). Much
- Page 40 and 41: ize the informal equal efforts to a
- Page 42 and 43: struction and development. Means sh
- Page 44 and 45: opportunities should focus on exist
- Page 46 and 47: 2. Dodd-Frank Act and Remittances t
- Page 48 and 49: leadership. Formal payments systems
- Page 50 and 51: and financial institutions. 26 Reso
- Page 52 and 53: closures should be both in English
- Page 54 and 55: issued a new proposed regulation De
- Page 56 and 57: “closed network,” in which all
- Page 58 and 59: Some guidance may be found in the p
- Page 60 and 61: the use of mobile devices for money
- Page 64 and 65: will be available in all cases. CFP
- Page 66 and 67: Section II: Remittances in Post-Con
- Page 68 and 69: Sri Lanka. The conflict also result
- Page 70 and 71: Figure 2: Current Account, Trade Ba
- Page 72 and 73: flows came from migrant workers in
- Page 74 and 75: Informal Remittance Channels in Sri
- Page 76 and 77: tory authorities, with some calls f
- Page 78 and 79: 4. The Role of Remittances in Post-
- Page 80 and 81: Figure 1: Liberia Per Capita Income
- Page 82 and 83: associations, women’s groups, alu
- Page 84 and 85: Remittances to LiberiaValue of Remi
- Page 86 and 87: credit because of the need to be li
- Page 88 and 89: Remittance Transfers in Sierra Leon
- Page 90 and 91: Knowledge RemittanceThe Liberian di
- Page 92 and 93: process furthermore was a pioneerin
- Page 94 and 95: Levitt, Peggy and Deepak Lamba-Niev
- Page 96 and 97: Section III: Diaspora Networks andC
- Page 98 and 99: Post-Conflict Development,” this
- Page 100 and 101: One of the main challenges for mobi
- Page 102 and 103: 6. Transnational Remittances and De
- Page 104 and 105: The Salvadoran Diaspora is very sig
- Page 106 and 107: annually during the 1990s to less t
- Page 108 and 109: Figure 2: Transnational Vicious Cyc
- Page 110 and 111: The transnational vicious cycle not
- Page 112 and 113:
emittance flows is mixed, as initia
- Page 114 and 115:
individuals, communities, and famil
- Page 116 and 117:
areas. This issue can potentially b
- Page 118 and 119:
This is a breakthrough moment: afte
- Page 120 and 121:
Edwards, Sebastian and I. Igal Mage
- Page 122 and 123:
y La Distribucion Del Ingreso, 1st
- Page 124 and 125:
7. Remittances and Community Resili
- Page 126 and 127:
For quantitative data collection, a
- Page 128 and 129:
Remittances are perceived as playin
- Page 130 and 131:
the affected population. Internatio
- Page 132 and 133:
ReferencesAddleton, J. 1984. The im
- Page 134 and 135:
8. Filling the Gap in Health Staffi
- Page 136 and 137:
The alternative is for donors to se
- Page 138 and 139:
cians in the U.S. in 2000 (Clemens
- Page 141 and 142:
1. Remittances, Financial Inclusion
- Page 143 and 144:
networks, and communities. The role
- Page 145 and 146:
• In the present era of heightene
- Page 147 and 148:
the island of Kosrae, in the Federa
- Page 149 and 150:
and Sweden and has held visiting pr
- Page 151 and 152:
he organized a number of workshops
- Page 153 and 154:
Pardee Center Conference ReportsDev