13.07.2015 Views

Pardee-CFLP-Remittances-TF-Report

Pardee-CFLP-Remittances-TF-Report

Pardee-CFLP-Remittances-TF-Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Informal Remittance Channels in Sri LankaAccording to research conducted by Cheran and Aiken (2005), there are a totalof 100–150 Undiyal (the popular informal remittance channel in Sri Lanka)outlets in Toronto. These outlets are run by local entrepreneurs with diverseactivity profiles. The transactions are fairly simple, cheap, and fast. The sendergives the cash to the Undiyal agent, who then fills out a form (including detailsof the sender and receiver and amount in both Canadian dollars and Sri Lankanrupees). A transaction fee of five or ten dollars for amounts below and above$500, respectively, is charged, with a promise that the money will be deliveredon the same day or next day. These agents have employees throughout theremote parts of the northeastern region, creating an effective delivery system.These informal agents route remittances through Hong Kong, Singapore,Jakarta, and Bangkok as these markets are less regulated. The foreign exchangeblack market in Colombo is used to convert the money into Sri Lankan rupees.These agents seem to bypass the formal banking services of Sri Lanka largelybecause of the lack of Sri Lankan bank branches abroad and regulatory restrictionsat home. Consequently, informal remittance systems such as this havegreater geographic reach than formal systems.Vidya Vermireddy, Department of Economics, Boston UniversityReference: R. Cheran and S. Aiken (2005). The impact of international informalbanking on Canada: A case study of Tamil transnational money transfer networks(undiyal), Canada/Sri Lanka. A Working Paper, Spring 2005.mated to have accounted for nearly 50 percent of total remittances to Sri Lanka(Foundation for Development Cooperation 2007). The preference for informalover formal remittance channels by poorer migrants may be attributed to factorssuch as lower service fees, lack of bureaucratic procedures relative to banksthat limit the affordability of formal services, absence of documentation requirements,lack of door-to-door services in formal remittance channels, and thelimited availability of formal financial services in areas of conflict (Lasagabaster,Maimbo, and Hulugalle 2005; Foundation for Development Cooperation 2007).Since the 2002 ceasefire, informal money networks have assumed an additionalrole as agents for relief, rehabilitation and reconstruction, by helping to channelremittances for rehabilitation and reconstruction activities in conflict-affectedareas (Cheran and Aiken 2005).Remittance Flows to Post-Conflict States: Perspectives on Human Security and Development 67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!