will be available in all cases. CFPB guidance appears to recognize that fightingand other disruptions may delay the date on which funds will be ready fordisbursement, and provides an exception for war or civil unrest, natural disaster,garnishment or attachment of the funds after the transfer is sent, and governmentactions or restrictions that could not have been reasonably anticipatedby the remittance transfer provider, such as the imposition of foreign currencycontrols. 88 Many of the causes for delay in receiving funds when sent to a postconflictregion can be anticipated, but the length or severity of the disruptioncannot be determined in advance. The CFPB was notified during the commentperiod that infrastructure deficiencies in some countries may make it impossibleto determine the actual date on which funds will be available, but did notaddress this problem in its 2013 regulation.Foreign Laws Prohibiting ComplianceIn its 2012 rule, the CFPB addressed the problem that the laws of certain foreigncountries effectively prohibit compliance with its disclosure requirements. 89 Assuch, the CFPB created an exception that permits remittance transfer providersto use estimates, rather than exact numbers, if the provider cannot determinethe exact amounts when disclosure is required because of a recipient nation’slaws. 90 However, since this exception only applies when there is a national lawthat prevents compliance with the disclosures, it will not be of assistance whencompliance is made impossible due to the local political, economic, regulatory,and social conditions, such as may exist in post-conflict nations.CFPB Can Do MoreThe CFPB has broad authority to create exceptions and limitations to thestatutory provisions on remittance transfer providers. Section 904 of the EFTAgoverns all of the CFPB’s rulemakings under the EFTA. 91 This section specificallystates that the EFTA regulations may contain “such classifications, differentiations,or other provisions, and may provide for such adjustments and88 12 CFR §1005.33.89 Electronic Fund Transfers (Regulation E) 77 Fed. Reg. 50244.90 The August regulation also created an exception for international ACH transfers where the terms of the transferhave been negotiated by the United States Government and the recipient country’s government, and wherethe exchange rate is set by the recipient country on the business day after the provider has sent the remittancetransfer. The CFPB has published a list of the countries that qualify under the second exception. These countriesare: Aruba, Brazil, China, Ethiopia, and Libya. See Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Remittance Rule SafeHarbor Countries List (Sep. 26, 2012), available at http://tinyurl.com/Safe-Harbor-List.91 15 U.S.C. § 1693b.Remittance Flows to Post-Conflict States: Perspectives on Human Security and Development 57
exemptions for any class of electronic fund transfers or remittance transfers, asin the judgment of the CFPB are necessary and proper to effectuate the EFTA.”Likewise, section 1022 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which is the CFPB’s generalauthority to issue regulations for federal consumer laws (including the EFTA),provides that the CFPB may conditionally or unconditionally exempt any classof covered persons, service providers, or consumer financial products fromany rule. 92 Taken together, these statutory provisions leave no question that theCFPB has plenary authority to develop regulations that can create exemptions,differentiations, adjustments, and exceptions from the general requirements,and the CFPB can classify products as subject to or not subject to regulation,and otherwise tailor its regulations to achieve the purposes of the EFTA and thepolicy objectives of section 1022 of the Dodd-Frank Act. The legal authority ofthe CFPB to make adjustments to the disclosure rules to take into account thespecial circumstances of post-conflict nations is clear.CONCLUSIONThe Dodd-Frank Act amendments to the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, and theimplementing regulations issued by the CFPB, are intended to provide enhancedconsumer protections to U.S. residents sending funds to foreign countries. Thelegislation and regulations were designed for a model in which the remittancetransfers are subject to known rules and regulations, where all fees can bedetermined beforehand, and where exchange rates and timing can be predictedwith near certainty. This model does not exist for remittances sent to many postconflictcountries. In these nations, the financial regulatory structure is weak, thepolitical and legal infrastructure unstable, and corruption or fear of corruptionprevalent. Under these circumstances, it is difficult, if not impossible, to knowwith certainty many of the facts that the regulation requires remittance providersto disclose accurately when the remittance is initiated. The CFPB has madeattempts to deal with these issues, but much more needs to be done to assurethat these new rules will not inhibit fund transfers to post-conflict regions.92 12 U.S.C. § 5512 (b)(3).58 A <strong>Pardee</strong> Center Task Force <strong>Report</strong> | October 2013
- Page 1 and 2:
Pardee Center TASK FORCE Report oct
- Page 3 and 4:
This series of papers, Pardee Cente
- Page 5 and 6:
AcknowledgementsThis Task Force on
- Page 7 and 8:
ITU International Telecommunication
- Page 9 and 10:
networks and migrant associations i
- Page 11 and 12:
to developing countries than other
- Page 13 and 14: But most importantly, remittances a
- Page 15 and 16: often mix in the countries of desti
- Page 17 and 18: According to the World Bank estimat
- Page 19 and 20: Because of its focus on the multidi
- Page 21 and 22: eceiving remittances provides an en
- Page 23 and 24: associations for post-conflict inst
- Page 25 and 26: are proposed to avoid the associate
- Page 27 and 28: Terry, D. 2005. Remittances as a De
- Page 29 and 30: oader approach to post-conflict rem
- Page 31 and 32: networks can be seen as “homogeno
- Page 33 and 34: That personalized nature of hawala
- Page 35 and 36: Customary law (xeer) and other trad
- Page 37 and 38: the world (Lindley 2009, 531). Much
- Page 40 and 41: ize the informal equal efforts to a
- Page 42 and 43: struction and development. Means sh
- Page 44 and 45: opportunities should focus on exist
- Page 46 and 47: 2. Dodd-Frank Act and Remittances t
- Page 48 and 49: leadership. Formal payments systems
- Page 50 and 51: and financial institutions. 26 Reso
- Page 52 and 53: closures should be both in English
- Page 54 and 55: issued a new proposed regulation De
- Page 56 and 57: “closed network,” in which all
- Page 58 and 59: Some guidance may be found in the p
- Page 60 and 61: the use of mobile devices for money
- Page 62 and 63: Foreign TaxesUnder the 2012 regulat
- Page 66 and 67: Section II: Remittances in Post-Con
- Page 68 and 69: Sri Lanka. The conflict also result
- Page 70 and 71: Figure 2: Current Account, Trade Ba
- Page 72 and 73: flows came from migrant workers in
- Page 74 and 75: Informal Remittance Channels in Sri
- Page 76 and 77: tory authorities, with some calls f
- Page 78 and 79: 4. The Role of Remittances in Post-
- Page 80 and 81: Figure 1: Liberia Per Capita Income
- Page 82 and 83: associations, women’s groups, alu
- Page 84 and 85: Remittances to LiberiaValue of Remi
- Page 86 and 87: credit because of the need to be li
- Page 88 and 89: Remittance Transfers in Sierra Leon
- Page 90 and 91: Knowledge RemittanceThe Liberian di
- Page 92 and 93: process furthermore was a pioneerin
- Page 94 and 95: Levitt, Peggy and Deepak Lamba-Niev
- Page 96 and 97: Section III: Diaspora Networks andC
- Page 98 and 99: Post-Conflict Development,” this
- Page 100 and 101: One of the main challenges for mobi
- Page 102 and 103: 6. Transnational Remittances and De
- Page 104 and 105: The Salvadoran Diaspora is very sig
- Page 106 and 107: annually during the 1990s to less t
- Page 108 and 109: Figure 2: Transnational Vicious Cyc
- Page 110 and 111: The transnational vicious cycle not
- Page 112 and 113: emittance flows is mixed, as initia
- Page 114 and 115:
individuals, communities, and famil
- Page 116 and 117:
areas. This issue can potentially b
- Page 118 and 119:
This is a breakthrough moment: afte
- Page 120 and 121:
Edwards, Sebastian and I. Igal Mage
- Page 122 and 123:
y La Distribucion Del Ingreso, 1st
- Page 124 and 125:
7. Remittances and Community Resili
- Page 126 and 127:
For quantitative data collection, a
- Page 128 and 129:
Remittances are perceived as playin
- Page 130 and 131:
the affected population. Internatio
- Page 132 and 133:
ReferencesAddleton, J. 1984. The im
- Page 134 and 135:
8. Filling the Gap in Health Staffi
- Page 136 and 137:
The alternative is for donors to se
- Page 138 and 139:
cians in the U.S. in 2000 (Clemens
- Page 141 and 142:
1. Remittances, Financial Inclusion
- Page 143 and 144:
networks, and communities. The role
- Page 145 and 146:
• In the present era of heightene
- Page 147 and 148:
the island of Kosrae, in the Federa
- Page 149 and 150:
and Sweden and has held visiting pr
- Page 151 and 152:
he organized a number of workshops
- Page 153 and 154:
Pardee Center Conference ReportsDev