The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Locomotion<br />
Ancestral amniote grade<br />
Amniote locomotion is compounded from several<br />
separate movements <strong>of</strong> the limbs <strong>and</strong> body. Lateral<br />
undulation <strong>of</strong> the vertebral column contributes a significant<br />
fraction <strong>of</strong> the overall stride length: as waves<br />
<strong>of</strong> contraction pass down alternate sides <strong>of</strong> the body,<br />
the limbs are passively protracted <strong>and</strong> retracted.<br />
Added to this, the limbs actively protract <strong>and</strong> retract<br />
relative to the vertebral column, which increases the<br />
length <strong>of</strong> the stride. <strong>The</strong> transversely oriented<br />
humerus <strong>and</strong> femur also undergo rotation about<br />
their long axes, which has the effect <strong>of</strong> shifting the<br />
foot forwards <strong>and</strong> backwards relative to the body.<br />
Finally, the limbs as a whole are extensible struts so<br />
the stride can be increased yet further by extension at<br />
the joints once the foot is behind the level <strong>of</strong> the limb<br />
girdle. <strong>The</strong> change from this design to that <strong>of</strong> mammals<br />
involved altering the relative contributions <strong>of</strong><br />
these four elements <strong>of</strong> the stride. Lateral undulation<br />
<strong>and</strong> long-axis rotation <strong>of</strong> the propodials were lost,<br />
while active retraction–protraction, <strong>and</strong> extension <strong>of</strong><br />
the limbs were retained <strong>and</strong> developed. Additionally,<br />
two new elements were added: movement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
shoulder girdle on the ribcage, <strong>and</strong> dorso-ventral<br />
bending <strong>of</strong> the lumbar region <strong>of</strong> the vertebral column.<br />
<strong>The</strong> reconstructions <strong>of</strong> the hypothetical ancestral<br />
stages <strong>of</strong> mammal-like reptiles illustrate much <strong>of</strong><br />
how <strong>and</strong> by inference why this radical remodelling <strong>of</strong><br />
the locomotor system occurred.<br />
No underst<strong>and</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> the functioning <strong>of</strong> locomotor<br />
systems, or the transition from primitive amniote to<br />
mammalian is possible without appreciating that in<br />
all non-specialised tetrapods the function <strong>of</strong> the forelimb<br />
differs in important respects from the hindlimb,<br />
which accounts for several differences in their design.<br />
<strong>The</strong> forelimb is primarily to maintain the front <strong>of</strong> the<br />
animal <strong>of</strong>f the ground during locomotion, <strong>and</strong> produces<br />
virtually no net locomotor force, analogous to<br />
the wheel <strong>of</strong> a wheelbarrow. <strong>The</strong> humerus has a simple,<br />
predetermined stride pattern <strong>and</strong> there is about<br />
the same volume <strong>of</strong> protractor as retractor musculature.<br />
It is the hindlimb that generates the necessary<br />
thrust. <strong>The</strong>refore, the hindlimb is the larger, movement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the femur is much less constrained, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
retractor musculature is far larger than the protractor<br />
musculature.<br />
EVOLUTION OF MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY 101<br />
Sphenacodontine grade<br />
As reviewed by Kemp (1982), Romer’s (1922) classic<br />
reconstruction <strong>of</strong> the musculature <strong>and</strong> locomotor<br />
mechanism <strong>of</strong> the pelycosaur Dimetrodon is still<br />
the basis for the sphenacodontine-grade ancestor,<br />
although subsequent studies, especially <strong>of</strong> the<br />
joints, have added further detail.<br />
Vertebral column. A significant modification <strong>of</strong> the<br />
vertebral column towards the eventual mammalian<br />
condition occurred, even at this early stage in which<br />
otherwise the locomotor apparatus is little modified<br />
from the ancestral amniote. <strong>The</strong> articulating surfaces<br />
<strong>of</strong> the zygapophyses <strong>of</strong> adjacent vertebrae are<br />
no longer horizontal, but oblique in orientation.<br />
Even in more primitive pelycosaurs, such as ophiacodontids,<br />
the prezygapophyses face inwards at an<br />
angle <strong>of</strong> about 30º from the horizontal, while in<br />
Dimetrodon the angle is increased to about 45º. This<br />
indicates that the lateral undulation component <strong>of</strong><br />
locomotion was reduced in pelycosaurs, <strong>and</strong> probably<br />
virtually abolished in the latter genus. <strong>The</strong> small<br />
size <strong>of</strong> the intercentra, small bones between the ventral<br />
margins <strong>of</strong> adjacent vertebrae, also relates to the<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> mobility between adjacent vertebrae,<br />
<strong>and</strong> presumably the loss <strong>of</strong> lateral undulation permitted<br />
certain pelycosaurs to evolve hugely long neural<br />
spines. Otherwise, the axial skeleton (Fig. 4.5(a)) has<br />
changed little from a primitive amniote condition.<br />
Moveably attached <strong>and</strong> ventrally directed ribs occur<br />
all the way back to the pelvic region, with no abrupt<br />
distinction between dorsal <strong>and</strong> lumbar regions, indicating<br />
that prevention <strong>of</strong> the body from sagging<br />
while walking still depended on the intercostal muscles<br />
<strong>and</strong> tendons between the ribs, rather than on the<br />
specialised lumbar musculature that evolved later.<br />
Forelimb. <strong>The</strong> action <strong>of</strong> the forelimb <strong>of</strong> pelycosaurs<br />
was heavily constrained by the design <strong>of</strong> the shoulder<br />
<strong>and</strong> elbow joints. <strong>The</strong> pectoral girdle (Fig. 4.5(b))<br />
is a massive structure. <strong>The</strong> clavicles <strong>and</strong> interclavicle<br />
together form a U-shaped arch around the thorax<br />
that would have prevented any extensive<br />
movements <strong>of</strong> the shoulder girdle relative to the<br />
ribcage. <strong>The</strong> scapula is very broad, <strong>and</strong> the coracoid<br />
plus procoracoid bones together form a broad ventral<br />
plate. <strong>The</strong> glenoid fossa is elongated from front<br />
to back <strong>and</strong> its articulatory surface is described as