The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
no significant novelties to what had evolved by the<br />
tritylodontid–tritheledontid grade (Jenkins <strong>and</strong><br />
Parrington 1976), but a number <strong>of</strong> refinements were<br />
added subsequently <strong>and</strong> are found as basic features<br />
<strong>of</strong> modern mammals. <strong>The</strong>se include the fusion <strong>of</strong><br />
the atlas intercentrum <strong>and</strong> neural arches to form the<br />
ring-shaped atlas vertebra, which rotates on the<br />
odontoid process <strong>of</strong> the axis, increasing the amplitude<br />
<strong>of</strong> head movements (Kemp 1969a). Fusion <strong>of</strong><br />
the cervical ribs to the vertebrae may also be associated<br />
with increased head movements.<br />
In the shoulder girdle, a vertical spine appeared,<br />
that is the homologue <strong>of</strong> the anterior edge <strong>of</strong> the<br />
primitive scapula blade. It separates the supraspinatus<br />
muscle in front <strong>of</strong> it from the infraspinatus muscle<br />
behind that is attached to what was the original<br />
lateral face <strong>of</strong> the scapula blade, <strong>and</strong> also gives origin<br />
to the deltoideus muscle. This increase in size <strong>and</strong><br />
elaboration <strong>of</strong> the protractor musculature, which is<br />
functionally the main weight-supporting musculature<br />
<strong>of</strong> the forelimb, yet again points to the support<br />
rather than thrust-generating function, even in mammals.<br />
In the hindlimb, one <strong>of</strong> the most unexpected<br />
adaptations was the evolution <strong>of</strong> superposition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
astragalus on the calcaneum, a process initiated in<br />
later cynodonts (Jenkins 1971a) but not coming to full<br />
expression until the mammals. <strong>The</strong> intratarsal joint<br />
between the astragalus <strong>and</strong> the calcaneum that was<br />
associated with the therapsid-stage dual gait had<br />
allowed rotation between these two bones about a<br />
transverse axis. With adoption <strong>of</strong> an obligatory<br />
parasagittal gait, the extra joint was no longer necessary,<br />
but instead <strong>of</strong> losing it, it became modified to<br />
allow pronation–supination movements <strong>of</strong> the foot<br />
relative to the lower leg. <strong>The</strong> astragalus shifted on to<br />
the top <strong>of</strong> the calcaneum, losing its contact with the<br />
ground. <strong>The</strong> axis <strong>of</strong> rotation therefore shifted to longitudinal,<br />
which permitted the foot to raise <strong>and</strong> lower<br />
its inner <strong>and</strong> outer edges. Thus another element was<br />
added to the increased manoeuvrability <strong>of</strong> mammals<br />
compared to primitive, sprawling-limbed tetrapods.<br />
Functional significance <strong>of</strong> mammalian locomotion<br />
<strong>The</strong> functional significance <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ound evolutionary<br />
changes in the anatomy <strong>of</strong> the postcranial<br />
skeleton <strong>and</strong> mechanics <strong>of</strong> locomotion from pelycosaur<br />
to mammal is open to debate. Modern<br />
non-cursorial mammals have neither greater<br />
EVOLUTION OF MAMMALIAN BIOLOGY 113<br />
maximum speed, nor greater mechanical efficiency<br />
than sprawling-gaited lizards <strong>of</strong> the same body<br />
weight, as demonstrated long ago by Bakker (1974).<br />
<strong>The</strong> mammal does have much greater locomotor<br />
stamina, being able to maintain a given speed for far<br />
longer before the oxygen debt accrues, but as discussed<br />
later this is a function <strong>of</strong> the animal’s physiology,<br />
not its morphology. <strong>The</strong>re are two current<br />
hypotheses to explain the anatomical changes. One is<br />
that by getting the feet underneath the body <strong>and</strong> the<br />
main musculature high up at the top <strong>of</strong> the limb,<br />
agility <strong>of</strong> locomotion was enhanced (Kemp 1982).<br />
This is a difficult property to measure, but it can be<br />
argued that the repositioning <strong>of</strong> the feet closer<br />
together decreased stability <strong>and</strong> therefore increased<br />
manoeuvrability. <strong>Mammals</strong> certainly seem more<br />
capable than reptiles <strong>of</strong> rapid changes in speed <strong>and</strong><br />
direction <strong>of</strong> movement, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> coping more effectively<br />
with a highly irregular terrain including tree<br />
climbing. <strong>The</strong> second hypothesis is that by ab<strong>and</strong>oning<br />
lateral undulation <strong>of</strong> the vertebral column, <strong>and</strong><br />
getting the belly permanently <strong>of</strong>f the ground, the rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> respiration could increase (Carrier 1987). Lateral<br />
undulation supposedly prevents breathing <strong>and</strong> running<br />
simultaneously, because as the lung on one side<br />
<strong>of</strong> the body is exp<strong>and</strong>ed, that on the other is compressed.<br />
Furthermore, a diaphragm at the back <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ribcage could not work so effectively if the belly was<br />
on the ground. This issue is discussed in a broader<br />
context later, but for the moment it may be noted that<br />
these two explanations are not mutually exclusive.<br />
Sense organs <strong>and</strong> brain<br />
Of the many features that distinguish mammals<br />
from reptiles, the extraordinary hearing mechanism<br />
utilising the old reptilian jaw hinge bones as ear ossicles,<br />
the vast expansion in range <strong>and</strong> sensitivity <strong>of</strong><br />
olfactory ability, <strong>and</strong> the monumental increase in<br />
brain volume by some ten times, mean the neurosensory<br />
system was as dramatically modified as any<br />
other. Most <strong>of</strong> the evolutionary changes affected s<strong>of</strong>t<br />
tissues <strong>and</strong> so little is known <strong>of</strong> them, but several<br />
aspects can be inferred from the fossil record.<br />
Hearing<br />
<strong>The</strong> enlargement <strong>of</strong> the dentary bone, <strong>and</strong> concomitant<br />
reduction in size <strong>of</strong> the postdentary bones <strong>and</strong>