07.12.2012 Views

The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle

The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle

The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

228 THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF MAMMALS<br />

<strong>and</strong> Skutschas 2001) <strong>and</strong> the Mongolian<br />

Prokennalestes (Fig. 5.17(c) <strong>and</strong> (d)) is Aptian or<br />

Albian in age, making it perhaps 10 Ma younger<br />

still (Kielan-Jaworowska <strong>and</strong> Dashzeveg 1989).<br />

Although it is generally supposed from their<br />

early appearance in Asia that this was the area <strong>of</strong><br />

origin <strong>of</strong> placentals, Cifelli (1999) described an associated<br />

pair <strong>of</strong> dentaries from the Cloverley Formation<br />

<strong>of</strong> Montana, which is also dated as Aptian-Albian.<br />

Montanalestes (Fig. 5.17(e)), as this specimen is<br />

named, has a submolariform last premolar followed<br />

by only three molars. However, the teeth differ in<br />

several respects from Prokennalestes (Fig. 5.17(d)),<br />

<strong>and</strong> until material <strong>of</strong> upper molars is found, a placental<br />

attribution <strong>of</strong> Montanalestes remains a<br />

biogeographically intriguing, but not totally established<br />

possibility. Another possible, though even<br />

more dubious, very early placental has been described<br />

from isolated molar teeth (Fig. 5.19(c)) from Morocco<br />

<strong>and</strong> named Tribotherium (Sigogneau-Russell 1995).<br />

It is dated as ?Berriasian, which is the very base <strong>of</strong><br />

the Cretaceous. <strong>The</strong> teeth do have some placental<br />

characters such as the narrow labial shelf <strong>of</strong> the<br />

upper molar, but lack others such as a third talonid<br />

cusp on the lowers. Were Tribotherium actually to<br />

prove to be a stem placental, it would be important<br />

because it would put the fossil date <strong>of</strong> divergence <strong>of</strong><br />

Placentalia from Marsupialia back to at least the<br />

start <strong>of</strong> the Cretaceous around 135 Ma. However,<br />

the information available is presently far too sparse<br />

to make such an assertion with confidence.<br />

During the Late Cretaceous, a radiation <strong>of</strong> placentals<br />

occurred. All remained small in body size,<br />

<strong>and</strong> fairly conservative in dental <strong>and</strong>, where known,<br />

cranial structure to such an extent that there is limited<br />

agreement on their classification. Relatively<br />

small differences have been used for ordinal <strong>and</strong><br />

even higher level separation, but had they all been<br />

living today most if not all the Late Cretaceous placentals<br />

might well have been incorporated into no<br />

higher a taxon than a superfamily. At one time it<br />

was in fact customary to include them in a single<br />

suborder Proteutheria, as a constituent <strong>of</strong> the order<br />

Insectivora (e.g. Romer 1966; Kielan-Jaworowska<br />

et al. 1979a). Inevitably, the taxon Proteutheria has<br />

long since disappeared from usage due to its manifestly<br />

paraphyletic nature, based as it necessarily<br />

had to be solely on ancestral dental characters.<br />

Kennalestes <strong>and</strong> Asioryctes from Asia, <strong>and</strong> Gypsonictops<br />

<strong>and</strong> Cimolestes from North America are among the<br />

best-known representatives <strong>of</strong> the Cretaceous placentals,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the level <strong>of</strong> taxonomic uncertainty surrounding<br />

them is well illustrated by a very brief,<br />

recent history <strong>of</strong> the classification <strong>of</strong> these four<br />

forms.<br />

● In the definitive review <strong>of</strong> the time, Kielan-<br />

Jaworowska et al. (1979a) placed Gypsonictops <strong>and</strong><br />

possibly Kennalestes in a super-family Leptictoidea.<br />

Asioryctes <strong>and</strong> Cimolestes were placed together in a<br />

family Palaeoryctidae that was part <strong>of</strong> another<br />

super-family, Palaeoryctoidea.<br />

● In their comprehensive classification <strong>of</strong> all mammals,<br />

McKenna <strong>and</strong> Bell (1997) placed Asioryctes<br />

into a group basal to most <strong>of</strong> the placental mammals,<br />

Kennalestes <strong>and</strong> Gypsonictops together in the<br />

same family, Gypsonictopidae, <strong>of</strong> a super-order<br />

Leptictida, <strong>and</strong> Cimolestes in an entirely separate<br />

Order Cimolesta.<br />

● Most recently, Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (2004)<br />

have associated the two Mongolian genera Asioryctes<br />

<strong>and</strong> Kennalestes in separate families <strong>of</strong> the same<br />

super-order Asioryctitheria. Gypsonictops is classified<br />

in a different super-order Insectivora as a leptictidan,<br />

<strong>and</strong> Cimolestes in yet a third super-order Ferae.<br />

Many other less comprehensive proposals <strong>of</strong> relationships<br />

concerning these forms have been made<br />

over the years, <strong>and</strong> there have also been a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> suggestions <strong>of</strong> relationships between specified<br />

Cretaceous placentals <strong>and</strong> particular groups <strong>of</strong> living<br />

mammals, considered later.<br />

Irrespective <strong>of</strong> the disputatious details <strong>of</strong> possible<br />

interrelationships, there are five main groups <strong>of</strong> Late<br />

Cretaceous placentals, the primitive form Asioryctes<br />

<strong>and</strong> its possible relatives, the leptictidans, the<br />

zalambdalestids, the sharper-toothed palaeoryctids,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the incipiently bunodont-toothed zhelestids.<br />

Asioryctida<br />

Asioryctes has been described from about 10 skulls<br />

<strong>and</strong> several fragmentary skeletons from the Coniacian<br />

<strong>and</strong> Campanian <strong>of</strong> Mongolia <strong>and</strong> elsewhere in Asia<br />

(Fig. 7.2(a)). It has retained several primitive placental<br />

characters that are modified in all other<br />

known Late Cretaceous forms, including the five<br />

upper <strong>and</strong> four lower incisors that occur in Eomaia

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!