The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
their presence. <strong>The</strong> five orders may be described<br />
briefly as follows.<br />
Litopterna. <strong>The</strong> litopterns were relatively conservative<br />
as far as the dentition is concerned, <strong>and</strong><br />
the teeth <strong>of</strong> the earliest members <strong>of</strong> the group<br />
(Fig 7.10(c)) resemble those <strong>of</strong> ‘condylarths’, particularly<br />
the South American group Didolodontidae<br />
(Fig. 7.10(b)). Some authors have even included the<br />
latter in the Litopterna. <strong>The</strong> crowns are generally<br />
low, <strong>and</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> lophs weak. In contrast,<br />
the limbs were the most highly evolved <strong>of</strong> the ungulates,<br />
with a strong tendency to reduce the side toes<br />
leaving the third digit dominant. Of the two groups<br />
<strong>of</strong> litopterns, the proterotherioideans were remarkable<br />
for their horse-like build <strong>and</strong> the Miocene member<br />
Thoatherium (Fig. 7.11(a)) possessed a single-toed,<br />
extraordinarily equid-like condition <strong>of</strong> its limbs. <strong>The</strong><br />
other group, the macrauchenioideans are invariably<br />
described as camel-like, with their elongated neck<br />
<strong>and</strong> limbs, <strong>and</strong> broad foot consisting <strong>of</strong> three almost<br />
equal toes. <strong>The</strong> group is also represented in the<br />
Eocene <strong>of</strong> Antarctica by teeth <strong>of</strong> Victorlemoinea.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Plio-Pleistocene Macrauchenia (Fig. 7.11(b)) has<br />
its nostril opening high up on its skull, which led to<br />
the belief that there was a proboscis present,<br />
although it might alternatively have been associated<br />
with a swampy habitat, or keeping the brain cool by<br />
evaporation. This genus also has the most derived<br />
molar teeth <strong>of</strong> all litopterns, having become highcrowned<br />
<strong>and</strong> lophodont.<br />
Notoungulata. <strong>The</strong> notoungulates were far the most<br />
diverse <strong>of</strong> the meridiungulate orders, with more than<br />
100 genera in 13 families evolving in the course <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Cenozoic (Fig. 7.10(f)). At one time, it was believed<br />
that there were Palaeocene notoungulates in China<br />
<strong>and</strong> North America, which were placed in a primitive<br />
family Arctostylopidae (page 242). However, the dental<br />
similarities on which the proposed relationship<br />
was based are evidently convergent <strong>and</strong> the arctostylopids<br />
are properly placed in an entirely unrelated<br />
placental order <strong>of</strong> their own (Cifelli et al. 1989; Cifelli<br />
<strong>and</strong> Schaff 1998). This leaves notoungulates as exclusively<br />
South American, with the single exception <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Pleistocene Mixotoxodon, which briefly extended its<br />
range into central America.<br />
Notoungulates are categorised by a generally<br />
broad, flat skull, <strong>and</strong> unique features <strong>of</strong> the auditory<br />
LIVING AND FOSSIL PLACENTALS 245<br />
region. <strong>The</strong> molar teeth tend to be strongly<br />
lophodont, <strong>and</strong> full hypsodonty is commonly<br />
developed. <strong>The</strong> most basal group, the Notioprogonia,<br />
were medium-sized, heavily built, <strong>and</strong> digitigrade<br />
animals (Fig. 7.12(a)). In the course <strong>of</strong> the Tertiary<br />
three groups evolved from notioprogonian-like<br />
ancestors. <strong>The</strong> toxodonts included the largest <strong>of</strong> all<br />
South American ungulates, with the late surviving<br />
Toxodon (Fig. 7.12(e)) the size <strong>and</strong> build <strong>of</strong> a large<br />
rhinoceros. Its incisor teeth were chisel-shaped <strong>and</strong><br />
the molars hypsodont, indicating a low-level browsing<br />
<strong>and</strong> grazing habit. <strong>The</strong> typotheres (Fig. 7.12(b) <strong>and</strong> (c))<br />
were rather like giant rodents, with loss <strong>of</strong> the anterior<br />
dentition except for broad, open-rooted, chisel shaped<br />
incisors, <strong>and</strong> again hypsodont molars. <strong>The</strong> third<br />
group, the hegetotheres (Fig. 7.12(d)), resembled the<br />
typotheres in dentition, but tended to develop elongated<br />
hind legs, giving them a rabbit-like appearance.<br />
Astrapotheria. <strong>The</strong> astropotheres were very large<br />
ungulates, with the best-known genus, the Oligocene<br />
Astrapotherium (Fig. 7.10(e) <strong>and</strong> 7.11(e)), some 3 m<br />
in length. <strong>The</strong> upper incisors <strong>of</strong> astropotheres are<br />
absent <strong>and</strong> presumably there was a horny pad<br />
against which the lower incisors bit. <strong>The</strong> upper<br />
canines are huge <strong>and</strong> tusk like while the lowers are<br />
less enlarged but still prominent. <strong>The</strong> last two<br />
molar teeth evolved enormous size. <strong>The</strong> nostrils<br />
have shifted to the top <strong>of</strong> the skull, suggesting the<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> a proboscis as in the litoptern<br />
Macrauchenia. <strong>The</strong> postcranial skeleton was<br />
extremely peculiar. <strong>The</strong> forelegs were very stout<br />
<strong>and</strong> strongly built, but the hindlegs relatively slender.<br />
Romer (1966) suggested the possibility <strong>of</strong> an<br />
amphibious mode, perhaps comparable to hippos.<br />
Astropotheres survived into the Late Miocene, <strong>and</strong><br />
are one <strong>of</strong> the two ungulate orders represented by<br />
teeth in the Eocene <strong>of</strong> Antarctica.<br />
Pyrotheria. <strong>The</strong> pyrotheres (Fig. 7.10(g) <strong>and</strong> 7.11(d))<br />
were also very large <strong>and</strong> elephant-like in general<br />
form (MacFadden <strong>and</strong> Frailey 1984). <strong>The</strong> similarity<br />
is enhanced by the tusk-like incisors, two upper <strong>and</strong><br />
one lower on either side. <strong>The</strong> six cheek teeth<br />
resembled those <strong>of</strong> primitive proboscideans in the<br />
transversely exp<strong>and</strong>ed, bilophodont condition.<br />
Compared to other South American ungulate orders,<br />
pyrotheres were short-lived, appearing in the early<br />
Eocene <strong>and</strong> disappearing during the Oligocene.