The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
272 THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF MAMMALS<br />
<strong>The</strong> other modern anthropoid group are the<br />
Catarrhini, the Old World monkeys <strong>and</strong> the apes.<br />
Several primitive members occur in the Late<br />
Eocene levels <strong>of</strong> the Fayum deposits, such as<br />
Catopithecus, for which there are several skulls preserved<br />
(Simons <strong>and</strong> Rasmussen 1996). It combines<br />
derived catarrhine characters <strong>of</strong> the dentition,<br />
including a reduction from three to two premolars<br />
<strong>and</strong> fused symphysis, with primitive features <strong>of</strong> the<br />
skull such as the relatively small brain <strong>and</strong> elongated<br />
snout. Aegyptopithecus is the most familiar<br />
basal catarrhine, coming from the slightly younger<br />
Early Oligocene level in the Fayum sequence. It<br />
was the size <strong>of</strong> a typical monkey, well adapted for<br />
arboreal life, <strong>and</strong> the rounded cusps <strong>of</strong> the molar<br />
teeth indicate a diet <strong>of</strong> fruit. <strong>The</strong>se basal catarrhines<br />
are conveniently grouped as the Propliopithecoidea,<br />
despite presumably being a paraphyletic group<br />
defined only by primitive characters, <strong>and</strong> containing<br />
the ancestors <strong>of</strong> the later anthropoid taxa<br />
(Rasmussen 2002). As with the platyrrhines, there is<br />
no agreement about precisely what the relationship<br />
is between the known basal anthropoids <strong>and</strong> the<br />
catarrhines.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is a considerable gap in the fossil record<br />
between the Early Oligocene basal catarrhines such<br />
as Aegyptopithecus, <strong>and</strong> the first occurrences <strong>of</strong> the<br />
derived lineages. <strong>The</strong> Old World monkeys,<br />
Cercopithecoidea, are unknown until the Early<br />
Miocene <strong>of</strong> Africa, when the Kenyan Victoriapithecus<br />
is found. <strong>The</strong> first <strong>of</strong> the apes, Hominoidea, may be<br />
slightly earlier if the tooth-bearing maxillary fragment<br />
referred to as Kamoyapithecus (Leakey et al.<br />
1995) is correctly identified <strong>and</strong> correctly dated as<br />
Late Oligocene. Otherwise, hominoids too commence<br />
their radiation in the Early Miocene <strong>of</strong> Africa<br />
in the form <strong>of</strong> the well-known genus Proconsul<br />
(Harrison 2002). By the Middle Miocene, radiations<br />
<strong>of</strong> hominoids were also well under way in Asia <strong>and</strong><br />
Europe. <strong>The</strong> third derived catarrhine group are the<br />
Pliopithecoidea, an exclusively Middle <strong>and</strong> Late<br />
Miocene group restricted to Europe <strong>and</strong> Asia.<br />
During their brief radiation, a range <strong>of</strong> size <strong>and</strong><br />
adaptations comparable to that <strong>of</strong> the Old World<br />
monkeys in Africa evolved (Begun 2002).<br />
<strong>The</strong> story <strong>of</strong> the origin <strong>and</strong> evolution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Hominidae, the australopithecines <strong>and</strong> hominines<br />
<strong>of</strong> Africa <strong>and</strong> their subsequent worldwide dispersal<br />
has been told so many times that it does not need<br />
repeating here. As far as mammalian radiation is<br />
concerned, the hominids were a very minor group<br />
<strong>of</strong> trivial significance, prior to the ecological effect<br />
<strong>of</strong> one species, Homo sapiens, since the Late<br />
Pleistocene a few thous<strong>and</strong> years ago.<br />
Dermoptera<br />
<strong>The</strong> sole living genus <strong>of</strong> the order Dermoptera is<br />
the colugo or flying lemur Cynocephalus, although<br />
despite this paucity, there is fossil evidence for a<br />
very long, if not very diverse history <strong>of</strong> the group.<br />
<strong>The</strong> dentition is particularly distinctive. <strong>The</strong>re is a<br />
gap between the front <strong>of</strong> the upper tooth rows, <strong>and</strong><br />
the two pairs <strong>of</strong> lower incisors have a unique,<br />
comb-like construction, consisting <strong>of</strong> many separate<br />
‘tines’. <strong>The</strong> cheek teeth are wide <strong>and</strong> have a<br />
curiously wrinkled enamel that creates a series <strong>of</strong><br />
sharp edges after a certain amount <strong>of</strong> wear. <strong>The</strong><br />
postcranial skeleton is also uniquely designed for<br />
supporting a gliding membrane stretched between<br />
all four limbs. On the basis <strong>of</strong> these characters, a<br />
fully evolved fossil dermopteran, Dermotherium, is<br />
recognisable in the Lower Eocene <strong>of</strong> Thail<strong>and</strong><br />
(Ducrocq et al. 1992). <strong>The</strong>re are much earlier specimens<br />
sometimes regarded as members <strong>of</strong> the order,<br />
namely the plagiomenids that occurred from the<br />
Early Palaeocene to Middle Eocene <strong>of</strong> North<br />
America. <strong>The</strong> lower dentition <strong>of</strong> a form such as<br />
Plagiomene certainly resembles that <strong>of</strong> Cynocephalus<br />
(Rose <strong>and</strong> Simons 1977), although others doubt the<br />
relationship (MacPhee et al. 1989).<br />
Dermoptera have been linked by several authors to<br />
the plesiadapiforms, the group <strong>of</strong> mainly Palaeocene<br />
forms sometimes regarded as basal primates. Kay et<br />
al. (1990) described similarities in the ear region, <strong>and</strong><br />
Szalay <strong>and</strong> Lucas (1993) detected homologies in the<br />
postcranial skeleton <strong>of</strong> the two groups. Other authors<br />
have, however, disputed the association <strong>of</strong> any, let<br />
alone all the plesiadapiforms with the Dermoptera,<br />
regarding the similarities as merely superficial,<br />
or primitive for the orders (Wible 1993; Bloch <strong>and</strong><br />
Silcox 2001).<br />
Sc<strong>and</strong>entia<br />
<strong>The</strong> tree shrews, at various times confidently classified<br />
as Insectivora, <strong>and</strong> as basal, virtually ancestral<br />
primates, are a distinct mammalian order, but one