The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
The Origin and Evolution of Mammals - Moodle
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>and</strong> Prokennalestes, although it does posses the more<br />
derived number <strong>of</strong> four premolars. In the skull<br />
there is a large lachrymal <strong>and</strong> a deep jugal bone. In<br />
the postcranial skeleton Asioryctes is uniquely primitive<br />
in its incompletely co-ossified atlas ring, <strong>and</strong><br />
in the absence <strong>of</strong> superposition <strong>of</strong> the astragalus on<br />
the calcaneum in the ankle that characterises all<br />
other placentals. Instead, the two bones lie side by<br />
side, so the astragalus has full contact with<br />
the ground (Kielan-Jaworowska 1977; Novacek<br />
1980).<br />
<strong>The</strong> molar teeth are unusual in being exceptionally<br />
transversely widened <strong>and</strong> narrow from front to<br />
back, so that the paracone <strong>and</strong> metacone <strong>of</strong> the<br />
uppers lie very close together. <strong>The</strong> trigonid <strong>of</strong> the<br />
lower molars is shorter than the talonid.<br />
<strong>The</strong> only closely related form is another Mongolian<br />
genus Ukhaatherium, <strong>of</strong> which there are also several<br />
skulls <strong>and</strong> skeletons (Novacek et al. 1997). It differs<br />
from Asioryctes in having less extremely narrowed<br />
molar teeth, in which feature it is presumably more<br />
primitive. An epipubic bone has been found in<br />
Ukhaatherium, indicating that this is a primitive feature<br />
<strong>of</strong> placentals as well as marsupials.<br />
Leptictida<br />
<strong>The</strong> North American Gypsonictops is only<br />
known from incomplete jaws <strong>and</strong> isolated teeth<br />
(Fig. 7.2(c)), although these are relatively common<br />
in the Campanian <strong>and</strong> Maastrichtian. <strong>The</strong> dentition<br />
is <strong>of</strong>ten taken as close to the unspecialised condition<br />
for Late Cretaceous placentals. <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> incisors<br />
is unknown, but the primitive condition <strong>of</strong> five<br />
premolars is probably present, the posteriormost <strong>of</strong><br />
which tends to be well molarised in form. <strong>The</strong> molar<br />
teeth are uncompressed from front to back, <strong>and</strong><br />
have well separated metacone <strong>and</strong> paracone.<br />
Kennalestes (Fig. 7.2(b)) is from the Coniacian to<br />
Campanian <strong>of</strong> Asia, <strong>and</strong> is a great deal better known<br />
than Gypsonictops, on the basis <strong>of</strong> complete skulls<br />
although not, as yet, postcranial skeletons. Like,<br />
Asioryctes, the skull is primitive in most respects, <strong>and</strong><br />
therefore it is not at all certain that Kennalestes should<br />
actually be included in the Leptictida (Novacek<br />
1986a; Kielan-Jaworowska et al. 2004): However, the<br />
premolar <strong>and</strong> molar teeth are very similar to those <strong>of</strong><br />
Gypsonictops. One derived character <strong>of</strong> Kennalestes,<br />
unknown for the American form, is the reduction <strong>of</strong><br />
LIVING AND FOSSIL PLACENTALS 229<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> incisor teeth to four uppers <strong>and</strong> three<br />
lowers, from the ancestral 5/4 condition.<br />
Leptictidans continued into the Palaeocene <strong>and</strong><br />
Eocene, when they are represented by complete<br />
skull <strong>and</strong> skeletal material described by Novacek<br />
(1986a), who considered them to be relatives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Lipotyphla on the basis <strong>of</strong> several cranial characters.<br />
Zalambdalestidae<br />
<strong>The</strong> earliest known zalambdalestid specimens are the<br />
jaws <strong>and</strong> teeth <strong>of</strong> Kulbeckia, from the Coniacian <strong>of</strong><br />
Uzbekistan, which is dated at 85–90 Ma (Archibald<br />
et al. 2001; Archibald <strong>and</strong> Averianov 2003), although<br />
the more familiar members are the two Mongolian<br />
genera, Zalambdalestes <strong>and</strong> Barunlestes (Fig. 7.2(f)),<br />
which are Campanian in age. <strong>The</strong>re are no known<br />
North American representatives.<br />
<strong>The</strong> family includes the largest <strong>of</strong> the Cretaceous<br />
placentals, with a skull length up to around 5 cm.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are only three incisors, <strong>and</strong> the first lower<br />
one is greatly enlarged <strong>and</strong> strongly procumbent.<br />
<strong>The</strong> lower molars have developed a relatively large,<br />
strongly basined talonid. <strong>The</strong> postcranial skeleton<br />
resembles superficially that <strong>of</strong> an elephant shrew,<br />
with elongated hind legs indicating a saltational<br />
ability. Kielan-Jaworowska et al. (1979a) speculate<br />
that they lived in a rocky habitat, <strong>and</strong> the procumbent<br />
lower incisor could extract insects from<br />
crevices.<br />
As far as the relationships <strong>of</strong> the group are concerned,<br />
they have <strong>of</strong>ten been associated with the<br />
anagalids, which occur in the Asian Palaeocene.<br />
More recently, some authors have claimed a relationship<br />
with the Glires, the supraordinal taxon that<br />
includes rodents <strong>and</strong> lagomorphs (Archibald et al.<br />
2001; Fostowicz-Frelik <strong>and</strong> Kielan-Jaworowska<br />
2002). <strong>The</strong> main character supporting this view is<br />
the similarity <strong>of</strong> the zalambdalestid lower incisor to<br />
that <strong>of</strong> the Glires. Both are enlarged, procumbent,<br />
<strong>and</strong> have the enamel restricted to the labial side.<br />
Palaeoryctida<br />
<strong>The</strong> North American genus Cimolestes (Fig. 7.2(d)) is<br />
usually accepted as a basal palaeoryctidan, an otherwise<br />
largely Palaeocene group <strong>of</strong> small, but incipiently<br />
more specialist carnivores (Lillegraven 1969).<br />
<strong>The</strong>y are characterised by the development <strong>of</strong> very