03.10.2015 Views

SAIVA-SIDDHANTA

sen-sd-studies-in-saiva-siddhanta

sen-sd-studies-in-saiva-siddhanta

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

&quot;<br />

This<br />

&quot;<br />

THE SVETASVATARA UPANISHAT. I2/<br />

was hitherto in scattered form and it did greater service in<br />

drawing out more fully the omni-penetrativeness and transcen<br />

dency of God over both Chetana and Achetana Prapancha, the<br />

world of souls and the world of matter. The Postulate of God s<br />

supreme Transcendency is the special effort of the Agama<br />

Philosophy to make out, and as this was the Highest End and<br />

Truth, it was called Siddhanta par excellence as distinguished<br />

from the Vedanta which led up the aspirant only to certain<br />

spiritual stages. It divided all philosophy and religion into four<br />

paths or Margas, called respectively Chariya, Kriya, Yoga and<br />

Jnana and these were<br />

;<br />

otherwise called Dasa Ma&quot;rga, Satputra<br />

Marga, Saha Marga and San Marga. In the exposition of these<br />

paths, it opened out a thoroughly reasoned system of practical<br />

Philosophy, neither contradicting our experience, nor causing<br />

violence to the most cherished of our sentiments, both moral<br />

and religious ;<br />

a system of thought which was progressive and<br />

built on an adamantine basis, step by step leading to higher<br />

knowledge ; a system * which by preserving and pointing out<br />

the essential difference of God, Soul and Matter, established a<br />

true relation between them ;<br />

which led to the highest monistic<br />

knowledge, a system<br />

which was at once dualism and nondualism,<br />

Dvaita and Advaita ; a system which appealed alike<br />

* Cf .<br />

Garbe, The Philosophy of Ancient India, p. 30. As for those<br />

from a monistic point of view<br />

who feel inclined to look down slightingly<br />

upon a dualistic conception of the world, the words of E. Roer in the<br />

Introchiction of the Bhashaparichcheda (p. XVI) may be quoted<br />

&quot;<br />

Though<br />

:<br />

a higher development of philosophy may destroy the distinctions between<br />

soul and matter, that is, may recognise matter or what is perceived as<br />

matter, as the same with the soul (as for instance, Leibnitz did),<br />

it is nevertheless certain that no true knowledge of the soul is possible<br />

without first<br />

drawing a most decided line of demarcation between the<br />

phenomena of matter and of the soul &quot;.<br />

sharp line of demarcation<br />

between the two domains was first drawn by Kapila. The knowledge of<br />

the difference between body and soul is one condition, and it is also an<br />

.indispensable condition, of arriving at a true monism. Every view of the<br />

world &quot;which confounds this difference can supply at best a one-sided<br />

benism, be it a spiritualism or an equally one-sided materialism,&quot;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!