03.11.2015 Views

TASKs for democracy

4NYw4W

4NYw4W

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ACTIVITY 1 “AN ART EXHIBIT… A DISPLAY OF ATTITUDES” – 80 MINUTES<br />

Resources<br />

<br />

<br />

Cards with the chosen organising principle <strong>for</strong> the exhibit: type of art, shape, colour, emotion, etc.<br />

Checklist of observable behaviour<br />

Practical arrangements<br />

The room should be set up with a central space <strong>for</strong> the role play and two tables that seat six each <strong>for</strong> preparation<br />

and debriefing.<br />

Procedure<br />

1. Preparation<br />

When teams gather to start, the facilitator presents the art (pictures or paintings) and gives instructions<br />

about the organising principle <strong>for</strong> the exhibit: the art should be displayed following criteria<br />

such as categories of type, shape, colour or emotion (chose as many criteria as you have groups; e.g.<br />

if the role play is played by two groups, then two criteria should be selected).<br />

<br />

<br />

Important: The teams are privately instructed to pursue one of the categories as the “natural” leading<br />

thread <strong>for</strong> the arrangement of the exhibition. The groups are given different criteria, but participants<br />

are not aware of this.<br />

The teams work separately and come up with a proposal. Two participants per group are designated<br />

to be observers and take notes as the group works out the proposal and finalises their exhibit plan.<br />

2. The role play<br />

The teams meet and act out the scene: their task is to organise the exhibit all together now.<br />

<br />

<br />

They continue until they have agreed on the organisation of the exhibition.<br />

The facilitator observes the negotiations among members and takes notes <strong>for</strong> use during the debriefing<br />

session.<br />

3. Observation results and analysis<br />

Participants go back into their teams. They work individually to fill in the CHECKLIST provided below<br />

and assess their own per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

The facilitator now pairs participants. Each member of a pair now uses the same checklist to assess<br />

the other’s per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Once this is done pairs discuss their results and compare how they see themselves and how the other<br />

perceives their behaviour. They agree on a final checklist (what the observer and the observed can<br />

agree on).<br />

Participants now regroup in their initial teams to discuss the experience and the difference between<br />

their self and peer assessments.<br />

Tips and potential difficulties<br />

<br />

<br />

This role play models a situation of conflict. The challenge or conflict occurs in the “collision” of divergent<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms of classification (induced by the diverging – and secret – organising principles on the<br />

cards) and hence dissimilar conceptions of the arrangement of the pieces of art.<br />

If the group does not manage to agree on a common organising principle to create an exhibit, the<br />

facilitator may interrupt the role play (20 to 30 minutes of role play should be enough <strong>for</strong> a group of<br />

24 participants), and thank the participants.<br />

<strong>TASKs</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>democracy</strong> Page 306

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!