01.01.2017 Views

Awareness in Buddhist Meditation

A detailed description of awareness in Buddhist Meditation.

A detailed description of awareness in Buddhist Meditation.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

37<br />

Here is a sensation which is conditioned and <strong>in</strong>fluenced by, and<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g from contact which is partially physical <strong>in</strong> its action and<br />

mental <strong>in</strong> its reaction. There is noth<strong>in</strong>g right and there is noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

wrong <strong>in</strong> such reaction, as long as it is only seen as a reaction. A<br />

bell sw<strong>in</strong>gs and a sound is heard. The same bell may be announc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a wedd<strong>in</strong>g or a funeral. Bare attention will not go beyond the sound<br />

and its immediate cause. These are wedd<strong>in</strong>g-bells, this is a deathknell;<br />

one is matrimonial announcement, the other is an obituary<br />

notice. And what do they signify? The beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of a new life and<br />

the end<strong>in</strong>g of a life-span.<br />

Is that anyth<strong>in</strong>g new or special? Life is beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g always, life<br />

is ever-new, life is always end<strong>in</strong>g, there is no life which is static.<br />

Thus it is not the sound of the bell I now bear, but I listen to<br />

the announcement of either life or death. And that is not ‘bare<br />

attention’; that is not see<strong>in</strong>g sensation as sensation, hear<strong>in</strong>g sound<br />

as sound; that is <strong>in</strong>terpretation. Now I can proceed once I recognize<br />

<strong>in</strong>terpretation as such, but that is not awareness of sensation. It is<br />

awareness of a reaction, which will be dealt with further on, when<br />

speak<strong>in</strong>g of awareness of the m<strong>in</strong>d’s reaction to contact and senseactivity<br />

(dhammānupassanā). In bare attention to sense-reaction to<br />

contact, there is no further thought of: for whom the bell tolls; for<br />

that <strong>in</strong>volves the m<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> deeper relationship, aff<strong>in</strong>ity, opposition,<br />

love and hate. In awareness of sensation there is no <strong>in</strong>volvement,<br />

and hence no self-connection. Here is sound or sight, or smell, or<br />

taste, or touch, but it is not ‘my’ sound. The thought of ‘self’ does<br />

not arise even if there is the qualification of pleasant or disagreeable,<br />

for that too does not belong to ‘me’.<br />

Thus, imperceptibly we have passed on from reception<br />

(vedanā) to perception (saññā) when awareness of sensation<br />

(vedanānupassanā) develops <strong>in</strong>to awareness of thought about sensation,<br />

which is perception.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!