01.01.2017 Views

Awareness in Buddhist Meditation

A detailed description of awareness in Buddhist Meditation.

A detailed description of awareness in Buddhist Meditation.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

70<br />

m<strong>in</strong>d aga<strong>in</strong>. ‘What is felt is perceived, and there is consciousness of<br />

what is perceived’ 15 .<br />

Methodical th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g (yoniso manasikāra) by itself cannot produce<br />

the right outlook (sammā-diṭṭhi). Striv<strong>in</strong>g for a solution can<br />

only lead to a search for an escape. That was discovered by Siddhartha<br />

the pr<strong>in</strong>ce, by Siddhartha the hermit, who <strong>in</strong> discard<strong>in</strong>g<br />

all search for ‘self’ found the solution <strong>in</strong> ‘no-self’ (anatta) <strong>in</strong> bare<br />

attention, <strong>in</strong> direct awareness of the basic problem which caused the<br />

conflict.<br />

Just as a violet can never become a rose, but a violet can be<br />

a perfect flower <strong>in</strong> itself, so the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of a search can never<br />

give that freedom from fear with its many false ideas of discipl<strong>in</strong>e<br />

and concentration. Only <strong>in</strong> awareness of the motive of a search, of<br />

the image of an ideal, of the concept of self-entity, can arise that<br />

<strong>in</strong>tuition which is perfect freedom from all experiments, as it is a<br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g experience of be<strong>in</strong>g awake.<br />

It should not be thought that perception (saññā) is halluc<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

because it does not perceive the sense-object as it is <strong>in</strong> itself.<br />

If perception is sought for the purpose of acquir<strong>in</strong>g knowledge of<br />

the object, it will not reach the desired goal, because the ultimates<br />

of sense-objects cannot be perceived by the sense-organs, but they<br />

can be seen <strong>in</strong> their reactions. And to see physical activity as a<br />

mental reaction is not the knowledge of physics (ñāṇa), but it is<br />

not halluc<strong>in</strong>ation either, as long as the reactivity of the m<strong>in</strong>d is the<br />

object of perception, which is a much deeper k<strong>in</strong>d of understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

(saññā), and which <strong>in</strong> its perfection can give <strong>in</strong>sight (paññā) <strong>in</strong>to<br />

the work<strong>in</strong>gs of the m<strong>in</strong>d, the composition of sense-m<strong>in</strong>d activity.<br />

Such clear-sightedness is not what is usually understood as clairvoyance<br />

and telepathy, the ‘div<strong>in</strong>e eye’ (dibba-cakkhu). It is super<strong>in</strong>tellectual,<br />

but not supernatural. It is not see<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs which are<br />

normally hidden from natural eye-sight. But it is see<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong><br />

15 (yaṁ vedeti taṁ sañjānāti, yaṁ sañjānāti taṁ vijānāti, Majjh. Nik. 43,<br />

Mahā Vedalla Sutta

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!