Awareness in Buddhist Meditation
A detailed description of awareness in Buddhist Meditation.
A detailed description of awareness in Buddhist Meditation.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
70<br />
m<strong>in</strong>d aga<strong>in</strong>. ‘What is felt is perceived, and there is consciousness of<br />
what is perceived’ 15 .<br />
Methodical th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g (yoniso manasikāra) by itself cannot produce<br />
the right outlook (sammā-diṭṭhi). Striv<strong>in</strong>g for a solution can<br />
only lead to a search for an escape. That was discovered by Siddhartha<br />
the pr<strong>in</strong>ce, by Siddhartha the hermit, who <strong>in</strong> discard<strong>in</strong>g<br />
all search for ‘self’ found the solution <strong>in</strong> ‘no-self’ (anatta) <strong>in</strong> bare<br />
attention, <strong>in</strong> direct awareness of the basic problem which caused the<br />
conflict.<br />
Just as a violet can never become a rose, but a violet can be<br />
a perfect flower <strong>in</strong> itself, so the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of a search can never<br />
give that freedom from fear with its many false ideas of discipl<strong>in</strong>e<br />
and concentration. Only <strong>in</strong> awareness of the motive of a search, of<br />
the image of an ideal, of the concept of self-entity, can arise that<br />
<strong>in</strong>tuition which is perfect freedom from all experiments, as it is a<br />
liv<strong>in</strong>g experience of be<strong>in</strong>g awake.<br />
It should not be thought that perception (saññā) is halluc<strong>in</strong>ation<br />
because it does not perceive the sense-object as it is <strong>in</strong> itself.<br />
If perception is sought for the purpose of acquir<strong>in</strong>g knowledge of<br />
the object, it will not reach the desired goal, because the ultimates<br />
of sense-objects cannot be perceived by the sense-organs, but they<br />
can be seen <strong>in</strong> their reactions. And to see physical activity as a<br />
mental reaction is not the knowledge of physics (ñāṇa), but it is<br />
not halluc<strong>in</strong>ation either, as long as the reactivity of the m<strong>in</strong>d is the<br />
object of perception, which is a much deeper k<strong>in</strong>d of understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
(saññā), and which <strong>in</strong> its perfection can give <strong>in</strong>sight (paññā) <strong>in</strong>to<br />
the work<strong>in</strong>gs of the m<strong>in</strong>d, the composition of sense-m<strong>in</strong>d activity.<br />
Such clear-sightedness is not what is usually understood as clairvoyance<br />
and telepathy, the ‘div<strong>in</strong>e eye’ (dibba-cakkhu). It is super<strong>in</strong>tellectual,<br />
but not supernatural. It is not see<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs which are<br />
normally hidden from natural eye-sight. But it is see<strong>in</strong>g th<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong><br />
15 (yaṁ vedeti taṁ sañjānāti, yaṁ sañjānāti taṁ vijānāti, Majjh. Nik. 43,<br />
Mahā Vedalla Sutta