01.01.2017 Views

Awareness in Buddhist Meditation

A detailed description of awareness in Buddhist Meditation.

A detailed description of awareness in Buddhist Meditation.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

43<br />

an entity, free from the opposition of a ‘self’-subject aga<strong>in</strong>st the<br />

sense-object, and free from conflict caused by such opposition.<br />

But theoretical knowledge of these conditions is hardly a beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of the process of emancipation. Even the wish for understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and deliverance is a b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g factor, which too must become an<br />

object of awareness to be freed from it.<br />

The ten Fetters<br />

The ten fetters (saṁyojana) which prevent progress on the path<br />

are therefore also mentioned as mental objects for awareness<br />

(dhammānupassanā). The study of these ten fetters <strong>in</strong> full can be<br />

found <strong>in</strong> the present author’s monograph ‘Fetters’ (1946) under his<br />

religious name, Bhikkhu Dhammapāla.<br />

The ten fetters are grouped accord<strong>in</strong>g to the four stages of sa<strong>in</strong>thood,<br />

and the release from those fetters accords with the gradual<br />

realisation of arahantship.<br />

The first group accord<strong>in</strong>g to the four stages of sa<strong>in</strong>thood, and<br />

the release from those fetters, the overcom<strong>in</strong>g of which marks the<br />

entrance on to the path of hol<strong>in</strong>ess (sotāpanna), consists of three<br />

fetters: misconception of <strong>in</strong>dividuality (sakkāya-diṭṭhi), sceptical<br />

doubt (vicikicchā) and attachment to rules and rites (sīlabbataparamāsa).<br />

There are twenty k<strong>in</strong>ds of misconception of <strong>in</strong>dividuality<br />

(sakkāya-diṭṭhi). They are the beliefs that there is a permanent entity<br />

which is identical with any of the five groups (pañcakkhandha)<br />

of the body-m<strong>in</strong>d comb<strong>in</strong>e, namely the physical body (rūpa), sensations<br />

(vedanā), perceptions (saññā), ideations (saṅkhāra) or consciousness<br />

(viññāṇa); or the five k<strong>in</strong>ds of belief that the <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

as an entity is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> any of those five groups of matter and<br />

m<strong>in</strong>d; or the five k<strong>in</strong>ds of belief that the <strong>in</strong>dividual as an entity<br />

is <strong>in</strong>dependent of those five groups; or the five k<strong>in</strong>ds of belief that<br />

the <strong>in</strong>dividual entity is the owner on those five groups. How does<br />

consciousness become ‘self’ delusion (sakkāya-diṭṭhi)? For, it is not

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!