Awareness in Buddhist Meditation
A detailed description of awareness in Buddhist Meditation.
A detailed description of awareness in Buddhist Meditation.
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
52<br />
which is a mental exultation (pīti), but which can never be an object<br />
of thought. The memory of joy may provide a pleasant memory of<br />
an experience <strong>in</strong> the past, but that is not joy, that is not delight.<br />
Why should a memory be called back to provide satisfaction <strong>in</strong> the<br />
present? It is clear that <strong>in</strong> such memory there is no experienc<strong>in</strong>g, but<br />
only a desire for gratification. It is the thought of ‘self’-gratification<br />
which makes thought delve <strong>in</strong>to the archives of memory for the purpose<br />
of fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a blank <strong>in</strong> the present. Just because here is no joy,<br />
one recalls a joyous experience. Thus the experience has become<br />
the property of an experiencer who is now crav<strong>in</strong>g for an cl<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g to<br />
what has been experienced, idealised, stored away and now brought<br />
back to fill the vacuum of the present moment. That means, the<br />
present moment had no experience to satisfy the ‘self’ and now the<br />
‘I’ goes back <strong>in</strong>to the past, hav<strong>in</strong>g separated itself from the experience<br />
and br<strong>in</strong>gs back a dead memory. Thus, the experiencer had<br />
no experience <strong>in</strong> the present. But if there was no experience <strong>in</strong> the<br />
present, there could have been an experiencer either.<br />
It is this separation of the actor from his action which sets up an<br />
opposition of conflict: the ‘I’ which is the experiencer, the th<strong>in</strong>ker,<br />
the actor, wants to possess the experience as ‘m<strong>in</strong>e’, to call it back<br />
from memory, so that the ‘I’ can live aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> that experience. But<br />
the memory, of an experience is never an experience, and thus there<br />
cannot be an experiencer hold<strong>in</strong>g on to the past, to memory, to<br />
property. Such hold<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> is the present. ‘I’ am just that: a memory,<br />
a reflection, a projection, a ‘cl<strong>in</strong>ger’ to what is not! That is the work<br />
of awareness, to make free, to be free. And that is joy!<br />
Delight as a facet of <strong>in</strong>sight (bojjhaṅga) is a liv<strong>in</strong>g experience<br />
which has no duration and therefore is only experienc<strong>in</strong>g without<br />
comparison, without memory, without a past. In this actual experienc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
there is no thought about it, so that it cannot become a<br />
memory as there is no reflection of an ‘I’ who wants to reta<strong>in</strong>, to<br />
possess, to recall, to store. Such joy (pīti) is beyond logical thought<br />
(vitakka) and susta<strong>in</strong>ed application of m<strong>in</strong>d (vicāra). It has no aim