SuDS in London - a guide

Recommendations

Info

• The cost of utilities and maintenance has been reduced • Enhanced ecological value Lessons learned The installation of an adaptable and resilient water drainage network can provide infrastructure for a range of future uses depending on plot uptake and industry requirements. Aerial visualisation Plan Cross-section 114 5 Case studies
5.20 Great Kneighton / Clay Farm, Cambridge Location Cambridge Extent £45m Cost 109ha Date Final phase: 2020 Credits Cambridge City Council Countryside Properties Bovis Cala Homes Crest Nicholson Skanska Aecom PEP BBUK Studio James Blake Associates Environment Agency Hobson’s Conduit Trust SuDS components Soakaways Detention basins Bioretention basins Swales Rills Permeable paving Rainwater harvesting Green/brown roofs Summary Holistic integration of water management into major new development. Project description Great Kneighton, previously Clay Farm, is former green belt land 4km south of Cambridge. The site is typical for Cambridgeshire – flat, low-laying terrain, crossed with brooks and land drainage channels. The mixed use development site of Great Kneighton suffered from poorly draining clay soils and a high water table, 1m below ground. The site is within the catchment of the historic Hobson’s Conduit, which dictated stringent control measures for runoff from the development. Cambridge City Council, along with project partners, wished to install an integrated water management system within a designated strategic open space that forms part of the Cambridge Green Corridor. Objectives • Control outflow into Hobson’s Brook at 2l/s/ha • Install a SuDS code of conduct across the development site Permeable paving and tree planting • Withstand one in 100 year flood event, with 30% extra to allow for climate change • Provide amenity and ecological value to development Image courtesy of Simon Bunn 115 5 Case studies
Page 1 and 2:
SuDS in London - a guide November 2
Page 3 and 4:
Introduction
Page 5 and 6:
II Who is the guidance for? Primari
Page 7 and 8:
1 Principles of SuDS
Page 9 and 10:
1.2 Wider benefits The ambition for
Page 11 and 12:
1.3.1 Water quantity SuDS mitigate
Page 13 and 14:
1.3.2 Water quality Surface water i
Page 15 and 16:
1.3.4 Biodiversity London’s natur
Page 17 and 18:
2.1 What is unique about London? Th
Page 19 and 20:
Hampstead Ridge Valley Lea Valley L
Page 21 and 22:
• Amenity/biodiversity: the natur
Page 23 and 24:
2.7 Townscape Townscape is the mix
Page 25 and 26:
2.9 London’s green infrastructure
Page 27 and 28:
2.13 Archaeology London’s history
Page 29 and 30:
3 SuDS components
Page 31 and 32:
A number of case studies illustrati
Page 33 and 34:
3.2 Structures Roofs and walls can
Page 35 and 36:
Case study 1 - Structures Location
Page 37 and 38:
3.3 Infiltration systems London’s
Page 39 and 40:
Case study 3 - Infiltration systems
Page 41 and 42:
3.4 Filter strips Filter strips are
Page 43 and 44:
3.6 Wet swales and dry swales Swale
Page 45 and 46:
Case study 5 - Swale Location Mill
Page 47 and 48:
Maintenance Channel systems require
Page 49 and 50:
Case study 6 - Bioretention Locatio
Page 51 and 52:
3.9 Trees Trees in the hard landsca
Page 53 and 54:
Street trees: biodiversity Where tr
Page 55 and 56:
3.10 Permeable paving Permeable pav
Page 57 and 58:
Case study 9 - Permeable paving Loc
Page 59 and 60:
3.11 Detention basins Detention bas
Page 61 and 62:
3.12 Attenuation and storage tanks
Page 63 and 64: Design considerations Sedimentation
Page 65 and 66: 4 SuDS in London’s streets
Page 67 and 68: 4.2 Street scenarios Street scenari
Page 69 and 70: Street scenario 3 An important foca
Page 71 and 72: Street scenario 5 A well-connected
Page 73 and 74: Street scenario 7 A local shopping
Page 75 and 76: 5 Case studies
Page 77 and 78: 5.1 Priory Common rain meadow Locat
Page 79 and 80: 5.2 Upminster Bridge swale Location
Page 81 and 82: 5.3 Kenmont Gardens Location Kensal
Page 83 and 84: 5.4 Derbyshire Street Pocket Park L
Page 85 and 86: 5.5 Renfrew Close Location London B
Page 87 and 88: 5.6 Islington Town Hall Location Up
Page 89 and 90: 5.7 Rectory Gardens Location Hornse
Page 91 and 92: 5.8 Talgarth Road Location Talgarth
Page 93 and 94: 5.9 Mile End Green Bridge Location
Page 95 and 96: 5.10 Queen Caroline Estate Location
Page 97 and 98: 5.11 Bridget Joyce Square, Australi
Page 99 and 100: 5.12 Crown Woods Way Location Eltha
Page 101 and 102: 5.13 Hackbridge Location Hackbridge
Page 103 and 104: 5.14 Goldhawk Road Location Shepher
Page 105 and 106: 5.15 Firs Farm Wetlands Location Wi
Page 107 and 108: 5.16 Salmons Brook Glenbrook Stream
Page 109 and 110: 5.17 LuL depot roof, Middlesex Loca
Page 111 and 112: 5.18 A23 Coulsdon Bypass, Farthing
Page 113: 5.19 London Sustainable Industries
Page 117 and 118: 5.21 Alnarpsgården Swedish Univers
Page 119 and 120: 5.22 Benthemplein (Water Square) Lo
Page 121 and 122: 5.23 Rue Garibaldi Location Lyon Fr
Page 123 and 124: 5.24 Bo01 Võstra Hamnen Location M
Page 125 and 126: 6 Implementation
Page 127 and 128: Kings Cross LWT: Camley Street A so
Page 129 and 130: 6.3 Drainage hierarchy SuDS designs
Page 131 and 132: 7 Cost benefit
Page 133 and 134: 7.2 Methodology Cost benefit estima
Page 135 and 136: 4.4 LANDSCAPE WATER MANAGEMENT STRA
Page 137 and 138: Appendices
Page 139 and 140: i-Tree Eco Project (2015) Valuing L
Page 141 and 142: Movement of water from one location
Page 143 and 144: Heat island Describes urban built u
Page 145 and 146: Prevention Site design and manageme
Page 147 and 148: Team The guidance has been produced
Page 149 and 150: Photo credits 80 Swale sections TfL
show all

SuDS in London - a guide

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?