15–16
ombudsman-annual-report15-16
ombudsman-annual-report15-16
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
who wish to claim a refund of the Goods and<br />
Services Tax (GST) on goods purchased before<br />
departing Australia, to present themselves at the<br />
airport’s TRS counter at least 30 minutes prior<br />
to their flight’s scheduled departure time.<br />
The stated purpose of the rule is to ensure<br />
people claiming a refund allow sufficient time to<br />
do so, so that flight departures are not delayed.<br />
The department has acknowledged that the<br />
30 minute rule is not supported by legislation<br />
and says it is considering how changes<br />
to the processes at the TRS facilities can<br />
be implemented.<br />
The Ombudsman made two recommendations:<br />
• that, as an interim measure,<br />
the department should take all reasonable<br />
steps to ensure that travellers who wish<br />
to claim a TRS refund are able to do so in<br />
a way that is consistent with the law.<br />
• that the department considers the<br />
permanent use of the drop box facility<br />
at TRS facilities at all international points<br />
of departure, and takes all necessary<br />
steps to ensure the appropriate<br />
regulations are in place to give effect<br />
to this arrangement.<br />
The department accepted the recommendations<br />
and the office will monitor the implementation<br />
of these changes in 2016–17.<br />
Liaison and<br />
stakeholder engagement<br />
The office continues to meet regularly with<br />
the department to discuss systemic issues and<br />
matters of interest to both agencies. The office<br />
also received briefings from the department<br />
where detailed information was requested on<br />
a specific issue.<br />
The office continued a program of community<br />
roundtable meetings as well as liaison with<br />
advocacy groups such as the Refugee Council<br />
of Australia.<br />
The office also hosts quarterly meetings<br />
with the heads of the Australian Human<br />
Rights Commission, the United Nations High<br />
Commissioner for Refugees, the Australian Red<br />
Cross and Foundation House.<br />
Compliance monitoring<br />
In 20<strong>15–16</strong> the office continued its ongoing<br />
own motion investigation into the department’s<br />
(now the Australian Border Force—ABF)<br />
compliance activities involving locating, detaining<br />
and removing unlawful non-citizens. The<br />
investigation provides the government and the<br />
public with assurance that the ABF’s processes<br />
are lawful and in accordance with good practice.<br />
This is important as a departmental delegate<br />
may approve warrants allowing immigration<br />
officers to enter and search premises under<br />
s 251 of the Migration Act 1958. The office<br />
presented sessions to compliance staff on<br />
the functions of the Ombudsman’s office and<br />
observed field compliance operations in the<br />
following locations:<br />
• Griffith—August 2015<br />
• Melbourne—November 2015<br />
• Adelaide—June 2015<br />
• Perth—June 2015.<br />
The office observed that the ABF officers in<br />
the field act in a professional manner, and the<br />
office did not identify any areas of significant<br />
or systemic concern. However, some areas<br />
for improvement were identified. The office<br />
recommended that the ABF:<br />
• ensures that when detaining a person,<br />
departmental officers secure and tag the<br />
detainee’s valuables in bags and provide<br />
a receipt to the detainee<br />
• affords detainees a reasonable<br />
opportunity to secure and dispose<br />
of their assets before their removal,<br />
where practical<br />
• examines options to allow the ABF to<br />
seize identity documents not belonging<br />
to household members<br />
PART 4—WHAT WE DO<br />
20<strong>15–16</strong> | COMMONWEALTH OMBUDSMAN ANNUAL REPORT | 45