06.03.2017 Views

15–16

ombudsman-annual-report15-16

ombudsman-annual-report15-16

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PART 4—WHAT WE DO<br />

• adopts guidelines for the amount of<br />

time a person may be questioned<br />

without breaks<br />

• facilitates the claiming of superannuation<br />

by persons being removed, by providing<br />

the appropriate form as a standard part<br />

of the removal process<br />

In December 2015 the department advised<br />

that a number of reviews were underway that<br />

covered most of these recommendations.<br />

People detained and later<br />

released as ‘not-unlawful’<br />

The department provides the office with<br />

six-monthly reports on people who were<br />

detained but later released with the system<br />

descriptor ‘not-unlawful’. This descriptor is<br />

used when a detained person is found to be<br />

holding a valid visa, usually because of case law<br />

affecting his or her particular circumstance or<br />

because of notification issues surrounding visa<br />

cancellation decisions.<br />

For the calendar year 2015, the department<br />

reported that out of a total of 7563 people<br />

detained, 22 (0.29 per cent) were later released<br />

as not-unlawful, compared to 29 (0.83 per cent)<br />

out of 3486 persons detained during 2014.<br />

The office is satisfied that detention in these<br />

cases was not the result of systemic issues<br />

or maladministration.<br />

However, the average time people have spent<br />

in detention prior to errors being identified,<br />

and their subsequent release as ‘not-unlawful’,<br />

has increased from an average of five to<br />

six days in 2014 to an average of 12 days<br />

during the first half of 2015. For the latter half<br />

of 2015, this average increased to 65 days. It<br />

is understood that this increase is the result of<br />

significant delays in identifying lawfulness in five<br />

individual cases.<br />

Immigration detention reviews<br />

Statutory reporting (two-year review reports)<br />

When a person has been in immigration<br />

detention for two years, and then after every<br />

six months, the Secretary of the department<br />

must give the Ombudsman a review, under<br />

s 486N of the Migration Act 1958, relating to<br />

the circumstances of the person’s detention.<br />

Section 486O of the Migration Act requires<br />

the Ombudsman to give the Minister for<br />

Immigration and Border Protection a report on<br />

the appropriateness of the arrangements for<br />

that person’s detention. The Ombudsman also<br />

provides a de-identified version of the report to<br />

the Minister, which is tabled in the Parliament.<br />

In 20<strong>15–16</strong> the number of people subject<br />

to reporting under s 486O was at its highest<br />

point since the oversight function commenced<br />

in 2005. Although there was an increase<br />

in the number of people released from<br />

detention, the number of cases no longer<br />

subject to reporting was matched by new<br />

cases, including people detained after their<br />

visas had expired or were cancelled due to<br />

character concerns. The number of reportable<br />

cases therefore remained steady, although it is<br />

expected to decline in the next financial year.<br />

The office conducts interviews, primarily by<br />

telephone, with people in long-term detention.<br />

This highlights individual and emerging systemic<br />

issues experienced by people in community<br />

detention and in detention facilities.<br />

46 | COMMONWEALTH OMBUDSMAN ANNUAL REPORT | 20<strong>15–16</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!