15.12.2012 Views

deploying and managing ip over wdm networks - Index of

deploying and managing ip over wdm networks - Index of

deploying and managing ip over wdm networks - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

80 Deploying <strong>and</strong> Managing IP <strong>over</strong> WDM Networks<br />

described in [2], along with the requirements <strong>and</strong> issues that they impose [3],<br />

are summarized next:<br />

• The <strong>over</strong>lay model. The routing algorithm, topology distribution, <strong>and</strong><br />

connection setup signaling protocols <strong>of</strong> the IP <strong>and</strong> the WDM <strong>networks</strong><br />

are independent. The <strong>over</strong>lay model is the one that allows an easy<br />

migration from the existing situation to the deployment <strong>of</strong> ONEs for<br />

the transport <strong>of</strong> the IP directly <strong>over</strong> WDM. However, the implementation<br />

complexity <strong>of</strong> this model is a burden, <strong>and</strong> it does not promote the<br />

integration <strong>of</strong> the control plane <strong>of</strong> the IP <strong>and</strong> the WDM <strong>networks</strong>.<br />

Only a formal request is passed from the client layer to the server layer.<br />

• The peer model. The IP network has full topological view <strong>of</strong> the optical<br />

network <strong>and</strong> just a single routing algorithm instance is running in both<br />

the IP <strong>and</strong> the WDM <strong>networks</strong>. This model promotes the integration<br />

<strong>of</strong> the control plane <strong>of</strong> the IP <strong>and</strong> the WDM <strong>networks</strong> <strong>and</strong> is simpler in<br />

implementation, but its operation is far more complex than the <strong>over</strong>lay.<br />

In addition, this model can work only in cases where there is a single<br />

entity operating <strong>and</strong> <strong>managing</strong> the IP <strong>and</strong> the optical administrative<br />

domains.<br />

• The augmented model. This is a combination <strong>of</strong> the previous two models.<br />

Each layer has its own protocols; however, routing information<br />

exchange is allowed between the two layers. This model can be seen as<br />

the golden mean, combining the advantages <strong>of</strong> the peer <strong>and</strong> <strong>over</strong>lay<br />

model <strong>and</strong> minimizing their disadvantages at the same time.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the most significant control plane efforts on IP <strong>over</strong> optical area<br />

are reported hereafter, <strong>and</strong> although such efforts are still under development,<br />

their first results are being elaborated.<br />

5.3.1 MPLambdaS–Generalized MPLS<br />

The IETF has originally proposed the MPLambdaS framework [4], which<br />

extends the MPLS ideas to the optical domain, allowing the reuse <strong>of</strong> the existing<br />

Internet protocols with the appropriate extensions. The OSPF, as well as the<br />

IS-IS routing protocols, have been enhanced to disseminate information relevant<br />

to the optical domain [5, 6] allowing the route computation <strong>and</strong> automatic<br />

topology disc<strong>over</strong>y. Furthermore, [7] <strong>and</strong> [8] present the mapping between the<br />

signaling messages defined in the existing IP/MPLS signaling protocols, namely<br />

RSVP-TE <strong>and</strong> CR-LDP. This enables the automation <strong>of</strong> paths setup.<br />

MPlambdaS was originally based on the peer model, enabling direct interaction<br />

<strong>and</strong> integrated routing among the IP <strong>and</strong> the WDM layers. Later on,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!