15.12.2012 Views

deploying and managing ip over wdm networks - Index of

deploying and managing ip over wdm networks - Index of

deploying and managing ip over wdm networks - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

66 Deploying <strong>and</strong> Managing IP <strong>over</strong> WDM Networks<br />

protection purposes. The receiving node “listens” to both <strong>and</strong> will select<br />

the best.<br />

• 1:1 protection. This protection scheme only uses the protection path as<br />

soon as the working path fails. Then the protection path will take <strong>over</strong><br />

from the working one. Usually, the protection path is used for lowpriority<br />

traffic that will be dropped in case the working path fails.<br />

Because the transmitting node must be notified <strong>of</strong> the working path<br />

failure, this scheme is considerably slower than the first scheme.<br />

• 1:N protection. This scheme is different from the 1:1 protection with<br />

respect to the number <strong>of</strong> protection paths per working path. In this<br />

case, each protection path is used to protect N working paths. If a failure<br />

occurs with a certain working path, the protection path will take<br />

<strong>over</strong> until the working path has rec<strong>over</strong>ed. Similar to 1:1 protection,<br />

the protection path can be used for carrying low-priority traffic. Note<br />

that if there is a second failure, there will be no protection path to take<br />

<strong>over</strong>.<br />

• M:N protection. For each <strong>of</strong> the N working paths in this scheme, there<br />

are M protection paths available. The remaining characteristics are<br />

similar to 1:N protection.<br />

4.4.3 Performance Management<br />

The need for monitoring <strong>and</strong> <strong>managing</strong> the performance <strong>of</strong> <strong>networks</strong> is especially<br />

acute in WDM <strong>networks</strong> because <strong>of</strong> the high b<strong>and</strong>widths per wavelength<br />

<strong>and</strong> the number <strong>of</strong> users affected in case <strong>of</strong> problems. Performance monitoring<br />

in WDM typically involves the monitoring <strong>of</strong> the optical signal quality, determined<br />

by the power level <strong>and</strong> the signal-to-noise ratio. However, there are difficulties<br />

relating the signal quality with the performance management metrics as<br />

bit error rate (BER) <strong>and</strong> errored seconds (ES) [12]. In addition to monitoring<br />

the optical signal nonintrusively, three more requirements are identified [13]<br />

that should be met by a performance management method for all-optical WDM<br />

<strong>networks</strong>:<br />

• It should not need to access a specific data frame (frame format<br />

transparency).<br />

• It should work at a wide variety <strong>of</strong> bit rates (bit rate transparency).<br />

• Identification <strong>of</strong> the strength <strong>and</strong> source (type) <strong>of</strong> signal degradation<br />

should be possible.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!