18.03.2019 Views

Protestantism in Scotland - James Aitken Wylie

  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

party be<strong>in</strong>g then <strong>in</strong> power, patronage had been<br />

abolished. But now, patronage be<strong>in</strong>g restored,<br />

those who had entered the Church by the free<br />

choice of the people, and not by the nom<strong>in</strong>ation of<br />

the patron, were called on to retrace their steps, and<br />

beg<strong>in</strong> anew by pass<strong>in</strong>g through this ordeal.<br />

Collation from the bishop, which was also required<br />

of them, implied someth<strong>in</strong>g more than that they<br />

had been <strong>in</strong>formal m<strong>in</strong>isters, namely, that they had<br />

not been m<strong>in</strong>isters at all, nor had ever discharged<br />

one valid function. One of the clauses of that<br />

collation ran thus -- "I do hereby receive him <strong>in</strong>to<br />

the functions of the holy m<strong>in</strong>istry." That certa<strong>in</strong>ly<br />

meant that the man now receiv<strong>in</strong>g collation had not<br />

till then been clothed with the m<strong>in</strong>isterial office,<br />

and that for the first time was he now validly to<br />

discharge its functions. The pr<strong>in</strong>ciple on which all<br />

these changes proceeded was pla<strong>in</strong>ly this, that<br />

government was restor<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>Scotland</strong> a true<br />

m<strong>in</strong>istry, which it had lost when its ancient<br />

hierarchy was overthrown.<br />

It was not necessary <strong>in</strong> order to the carry<strong>in</strong>g out<br />

of these edicts that Charles II should leave London,<br />

394

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!