09.11.2019 Views

Brian P. Jacob, David C. Chen, Bruce Ramshaw, Shirin Towfigh (eds.) - The SAGES Manual of Groin Pain-Springer International Publishing (2016)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

19 Radiologic Evaluation for Postoperative <strong>Groin</strong> <strong>Pain</strong><br />

259<br />

Fig. 19.2. Axial MR T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fat-saturated T2-weighted<br />

images <strong>of</strong> bilateral flat mesh repairs. Both mesh are intact; however, large superficial<br />

fluid collections are seen bilaterally ( black arrows ). While simple seroma<br />

would appear bright on T2 sequences only, this fluid is also intermediately bright<br />

on T1 sequences, suggesting the presence <strong>of</strong> significant blood products. Both<br />

groins were percutaneously drained, demonstrating hematoma.<br />

Subacute blood products should appear bright on T1, differentiating<br />

between hematoma and abscess [ 5 ]. If uncertainty still exists, contrast<br />

may be utilized to demonstrate peripheral enhancement in abscess.<br />

Additionally, diffusion- weighted imaging (DWI) may be used to differentiate<br />

the diffusion-restricting abscess (DWI bright, ADC dark) from<br />

organizing hematoma, although early hematoma may restrict as well<br />

(Fig. 19.2 ) [ 6 ].<br />

Mesh Complications<br />

Mesh complications <strong>of</strong>ten present with subtle imaging findings, and<br />

may require knowledge <strong>of</strong> the operative technique utilized to diagnose<br />

definitively. US does not reliably identify the mesh, especially if it is<br />

folded, balled up, or otherwise complicated (Fig. 19.3 ). As such, US is<br />

not recommended as a first-line imaging modality to evaluate the postoperative<br />

groin after mesh implantation when the integrity <strong>of</strong> the mesh<br />

itself is in question. Due to the combination <strong>of</strong> low material density and<br />

minimal pr<strong>of</strong>ile, normal mesh material is <strong>of</strong>ten indistinguishable from<br />

surrounding tissue on CT [ 2 ], requiring the radiologist to discern a postoperative<br />

state from the presence and location <strong>of</strong> the patient’s surgical<br />

scars (Fig. 19.4 ). Even in states <strong>of</strong> chronic inflammation (e.g., mesh<br />

reaction), it may be impossible to specifically identify pathology on the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> CT alone. On MR, flat mesh materials appear as dark linear<br />

bands on T1 sequences, slightly thicker than normal fascial planes, but<br />

may be more difficult to identify among their surrounding tissues on<br />

fluid-sensitive sequences (Fig. 19.5 ).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!