09.11.2019 Views

Brian P. Jacob, David C. Chen, Bruce Ramshaw, Shirin Towfigh (eds.) - The SAGES Manual of Groin Pain-Springer International Publishing (2016)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

424<br />

N.F. Stoikes et al.<br />

However, the clinical data are not consistent and do not seem to correspond<br />

with the objective findings found in the basic science. Overall,<br />

autogenous and mesh repairs have been found to have similar outcomes<br />

<strong>of</strong> CGP. Further complicating the landscape are the different outcomes<br />

found with different techniques <strong>of</strong> either autogenous or mesh repairs. It<br />

has been suggested that there is more CGP with the McVay repair compared<br />

to the Shouldice repair [ 4 ]. <strong>The</strong>re are the same issues found with<br />

mesh repairs. Whether it is laparoscopic versus open, or fixation with<br />

fibrin glue, tacks, or sutures, they have all been evaluated and found to<br />

have different outcomes independent <strong>of</strong> the mesh. In fact, studies have<br />

supported that the laparoscopic approach appears to have the best results<br />

out <strong>of</strong> all autogenous and mesh repairs combined. Given this, mesh is<br />

clearly not the sole cause <strong>of</strong> CGP in inguinal hernia repair.<br />

CGP is a multifactorial process that is influenced by the innate complexity<br />

<strong>of</strong> groin anatomy, psychosocial issues, and various technique<br />

options requiring different anatomic knowledge for each approach. In<br />

spite <strong>of</strong> the difference <strong>of</strong> opinion between Fischer and Gilbert, they both<br />

indicated in their commentaries that the performance <strong>of</strong> excellent surgical<br />

technique—regardless <strong>of</strong> actual technique choice—was one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

most important factors in preventing CGP [ 4 , 5 ]. <strong>The</strong>refore, the best<br />

approach for an inguinal hernia repair lies in the hands <strong>of</strong> the surgeon to<br />

select a technique in which the surgeon has complete knowledge <strong>of</strong> all<br />

the potential technical pitfalls and is the most comfortable performing.<br />

References<br />

1. Kehlet H, Aasvang E. Chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. In: Schumpelick V,<br />

Fitzgibbons RJ, editors. Hernia repair sequelae. Berlin: <strong>Springer</strong>; 2010. p. 163–7.<br />

2. Demirer S, Kepenekci I, Evirgen O, Birsen O, Tuzuner A, Karahuseyinoglu S, et al.<br />

<strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> polypropylene mesh on ilioinguinal nerve in open mesh repair <strong>of</strong> groin<br />

hernia. J Res Surg. 2006;131(2):175–81.<br />

3. Bendavid R, Lou W, Koch A, Iakovlev V. Mesh-related SIN syndrome. A surreptitious<br />

irreversible neuralgia and its morphologic background in the etiology <strong>of</strong> post-herniorrhaphy<br />

pain. Int J Clin Med. 2014;5:799–810.<br />

4. Fischer JE. Hernia repair: why do we continue to perform mesh repair in the face <strong>of</strong><br />

the human toll <strong>of</strong> inguinodynia. Am J Surg. 2013;206(4):619–23.<br />

5. Gilbert AI. Hernia repair: do you know your own results? Am J Surg.<br />

2013;207(6):1002–3.<br />

6. Heise CP, Starling JR. Mesh inguinodynia: a new clinical syndrome after inguinal<br />

herniorrhaphy? J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187(5):514–8.<br />

7. Poobalan AS, <strong>Bruce</strong> J, Smith WC, King PM, Krukowski ZH, Chambers WA. A review<br />

<strong>of</strong> chronic pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy. Clin J <strong>Pain</strong>. 2003;19(1):48–54.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!