09.11.2019 Views

Brian P. Jacob, David C. Chen, Bruce Ramshaw, Shirin Towfigh (eds.) - The SAGES Manual of Groin Pain-Springer International Publishing (2016)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

32. Chronic <strong>Groin</strong> <strong>Pain</strong>: Mesh or No Mesh<br />

423<br />

<strong>The</strong>re were 100 patients in each arm. Chronic pain rate and time to pain<br />

disappearance were higher among patients in the permanent suture<br />

group. Similar comparisons have been done comparing adhesive and<br />

tacks in laparoscopy. Lovisetto et al. reviewed 197 patients with TAPP<br />

repair randomized to fibrin glue or tacks and followed them out to 2<br />

years [ 22 ]. Patients who had fixation with fibrin glue had significantly<br />

less acute and chronic postoperative pain. Topart et al. evaluated 168<br />

patients undergoing totally extraperitoneal (TEP) technique hernia<br />

repair [ 23 ]. Chronic pain occurred in 14.7 % <strong>of</strong> patients who had tacks<br />

for mesh fixation versus 4.5 % <strong>of</strong> patients with fibrin glue.<br />

Basic science studies evaluating different fixation methods and their<br />

effects on mesh and CGP are lacking. A recent study by Stoikes et al.<br />

compared fibrin glue fixation <strong>of</strong> lightweight mesh with permanent<br />

suture fixation in an animal model [ 24 ]. Though sutures were stronger<br />

than fibrin glue at 24 h, fibrin glue fixation was found to be adequate at<br />

24 h. At 1 week postoperatively, the fixation strength was equal between<br />

the groups. A secondary outcome was evaluation <strong>of</strong> mesh contraction<br />

between the two groups. <strong>The</strong> contraction rate was consistently greater in<br />

the suture group compared to the glue group, although not statistically<br />

significant. Possibilities affecting mesh contraction may be that the<br />

adhesive group fixates the entire surface <strong>of</strong> the mesh, thereby preventing<br />

folding and wrinkling. This ultimately allows the full area <strong>of</strong> the mesh<br />

to be fixed in granulation tissue. Such a finding links to the previously<br />

mentioned study by Bendavid, which showed that disfigured mesh created<br />

potential compartments for nerve entrapment, leading to CGP [ 3 ].<br />

Within the spectrum <strong>of</strong> mesh repairs, one can see that fixation choices<br />

and careful application <strong>of</strong> fixation can play a role affecting CGP, independent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the actual type <strong>of</strong> mesh used. <strong>The</strong> difference found with fixation<br />

alone is an example <strong>of</strong> the multitude <strong>of</strong> factors that can affect CGP<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> mesh or mesh type.<br />

Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a full spectrum <strong>of</strong> opinions about the use <strong>of</strong> synthetic mesh<br />

in inguinal hernia repair. <strong>The</strong>re are valid points from both sides <strong>of</strong> the<br />

controversy, but the data show that in reality CGP exists with both tissue<br />

repairs and mesh repairs. <strong>The</strong>ir etiologies are likely different. With tissue<br />

repairs, CGP may be due to entrapment <strong>of</strong> nerves by layers <strong>of</strong><br />

sutures; with mesh, it may be due to nerve entrapment from mesh deformation<br />

or a foreign body response causing nerve demyelination [ 2 , 3 ].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!