27.12.2012 Views

12th Congress of the European Hematology ... - Haematologica

12th Congress of the European Hematology ... - Haematologica

12th Congress of the European Hematology ... - Haematologica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 th <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> Association<br />

Stem cell transplantation II<br />

0421<br />

GRAFT-VERSUS-LEUKEMIA INDUCED BY GRAFT-VERSUS-HOST DISEASE EARLY AFTER<br />

ALLOGENEIC BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION IN CHILDREN WITH DETECTABLE<br />

LEVELS OF RESIDUAL ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA PRIOR TO TRANSPLANTATION<br />

M. Bierings, 1 A. Lankester, 2 V.J.V. van der Velden, 3 E. van Wering, 4<br />

T. Revesz, 1 A. Wijkhuis, 3 J.J.M. van Dongen, 3 M. Van Tol, 2 M. Egeler, 2<br />

M.W. Schilham2 1 Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, UTRECHT; 2 Leiden University Hospital, LEI-<br />

DEN; 3 Erasmus University, ROTTERDAM; 4 Dutch Childhood Oncology<br />

Group, THE HAGUE, Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

Children with high risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia who receive an<br />

allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) never<strong>the</strong>less have a high<br />

chance <strong>of</strong> relapse (40%). It has been reported that <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> minimal<br />

residual disease (MRD) detected by sensitive molecular techniques<br />

immediately prior to SCT predicts a very high probability <strong>of</strong> relapse<br />

(80%). This criterion was used to select patients for an intervention<br />

study. In patients with MRD levels > 1×10 –4 in <strong>the</strong>ir bone marrow pretransplantation,<br />

we have attempted to induce a graft-versus-leukemia<br />

effect by early tapering <strong>of</strong> cyclosporin A (CsA, 4-5 weeks post-SCT) followed,<br />

if needed, by infusion <strong>of</strong> incremental doses <strong>of</strong> donor lymphocytes<br />

(DLI). Dosage varied between 1×10 5 and 4×10 6 CD3 + cells/kg<br />

depending on transplantation characteristics. When GVHD grade II<br />

occurred, <strong>the</strong>rapy was initiated to suppress GVHD. Patients with low<br />

( 1×10 –4 . In 11 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se patients CsA was<br />

tapered 4-5 weeks after SCT. Four patients developed GVHD, grade II<br />

after tapering <strong>of</strong> CsA, which was controlled by treatment. Two relapsed,<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two are still in remission. The remaining 7 MRD-positive<br />

patients received DLI, and did not develop GVHD. Of those 7 patients,<br />

5 had a relapse and 2 are in remission as <strong>of</strong> to date. Of <strong>the</strong> 7 relapses 4<br />

were extramedullary. Of <strong>the</strong> remaining 29 patients in whom MRD was<br />

ei<strong>the</strong>r below <strong>the</strong> cut-<strong>of</strong>f level <strong>of</strong> 1×10 –4 , positive but not quantifiable, or<br />

undetectable, 9 relapsed (31%) with GVHD greater than grade I, in 2<br />

patients. As no transplant related mortality was seen, due to induction<br />

<strong>of</strong> GVHD, <strong>the</strong>se data indicate that early reduction <strong>of</strong> immunosuppression<br />

and low dosis DLI can safely be performed following SCT. The<br />

timing <strong>of</strong> (mostly) extramedullary relapses in <strong>the</strong> MRD high group suggests<br />

an antileukemic effect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intervention.<br />

0422<br />

A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF TWO DOSE-INTENSIVE MELPHALAN REGIMENS<br />

(100 VS 200 MG/MQ) IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED MYELOMA PATIENTS<br />

A. Palumbo, 1 S. Bringhen, 1 M.T. Petrucci, 2 A. Falcone, 3 A.M. Liberati, 4<br />

M. Grasso, 5 F. Pisani, 6 C. Cangialosi, 7 T. Caravita, 8 F. D'Agostino, 1<br />

F. Cavallo, 1 P. Omedè, 1 P. Musto, 9 R. Foà, 2 M. Boccadoro1 1 Az. Osp. S. Giovanni Battista, TORINO; 2 Università La Sapienza, ROMA;<br />

3 IRCCS Casa Sollievo della S<strong>of</strong>ferenza, SAN GIOVANNI ROTONDO (FG);<br />

4 Policlinico Monteluce, PERUGIA; 5 Az. Osp. S. Croce e Carle, CUNEO; 6 Istituto<br />

Regina Elena, ROMA; 7 Az. Osp. Cervello, PALERMO; 8 Università Tor<br />

Vergata, ROMA; 9 Centro Riferimento Oncologico Basilicata, RIONERO IN<br />

VULTURE (PZ), Italy<br />

Background. Several trials have shown <strong>the</strong> superiority <strong>of</strong> high-dose<br />

melphalan (usually 200 mg/m 2 , MEL200) versus standard <strong>the</strong>rapy in<br />

myeloma patients. Intermediate-dose melphalan (100 mg/m 2 , MEL100)<br />

is also superior to <strong>the</strong> standard dose, but has not been clinically compared<br />

with MEL200 in a randomized study. In this prospective, randomized,<br />

phase III trial, we compared MEL200 with MEL100. Aims. The primary<br />

end points were complete remission (CR) rate, event-free survival<br />

(EFS) and incidence <strong>of</strong> gastrointestinal toxicity, infections and early<br />

deaths. Methods. Between January 2002 and July 2006, 298 patients were<br />

enrolled. Inclusion criteria were previously untreated myeloma, age < 65<br />

and Durie and Salmon stage II or III. Exclusion criteria were prior treatment<br />

for myeloma, abnormal cardiac function (systolic ejection fraction<br />

3<br />

mg/dL), HBV, HCV, or HIV positivity, concomitant cancer or psychi-<br />

156 | haematologica/<strong>the</strong> hematology journal | 2007; 92(s1)<br />

atric disease. The institutional review board approved <strong>the</strong> protocol and<br />

written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All patients<br />

received: 2 DAV debulking courses (dexamethasone-doxorubicin-vincristine),<br />

2 cycles <strong>of</strong> cyclophosphamide (4 mg/m 2 ) plus G-CSF followed<br />

by stem cell harvest. The MEL200 group was conditioned with 2 cycles<br />

<strong>of</strong> melphalan 200 mg/m 2 . The MEL100 group was conditioned with 2<br />

courses <strong>of</strong> melphalan 100 mg/m 2 . All MEL courses were followed by<br />

stem cell infusion. Results. Two-hundred and forty-six patients (median<br />

age 57) were evaluable: 124 in <strong>the</strong> MEL200 arm and 122 in <strong>the</strong> MEL100.<br />

Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. In intention-to-treat<br />

analysis, <strong>the</strong> very good partial response rate was higher in MEL200 arm<br />

(38% versus 22%, p=0.011), but CR was 17% in <strong>the</strong> MEL200 group and<br />

10% in <strong>the</strong> MEL100 group (p=0.2). The median follow-up for censored<br />

patients was 26.5 months. The 3-years EFS was 48% in <strong>the</strong> MEL200 and<br />

31% in <strong>the</strong> MEL100 arm (p=0.31). The 3-years overall survival was 86%<br />

in <strong>the</strong> MEL200 and 71% in <strong>the</strong> MEL100 group (p=0.51). Forty-six<br />

patients did not complete tandem MEL200; 36 did not complete tandem<br />

MEL100. Severe hematologic toxicity was comparable in two arms, but<br />

84% <strong>of</strong> MEL200 patients received more than 4×10 6 CD34 + /Kg compared<br />

with 52% <strong>of</strong> MEL100 (p=0.0001). Grade 3-4 non-hematologic adverse<br />

events were more frequent in <strong>the</strong> MEL200 (52% versus 34%, p=0.01 in<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1st cycle and 39% versus 31%, p=0.9 in <strong>the</strong> 2nd cycle). The incidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> severe gastrointestinal toxicity was 51% after MEL200 and 21% after<br />

MEL100 (p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!