27.12.2012 Views

12th Congress of the European Hematology ... - Haematologica

12th Congress of the European Hematology ... - Haematologica

12th Congress of the European Hematology ... - Haematologica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 th <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> Association<br />

working population <strong>of</strong> 419961 for Leicester (city and county) 8 this gives<br />

a prevalence <strong>of</strong> 6.07×10 –4 . The number <strong>of</strong> farmers in Leicester is 4175 9<br />

which gives a proportion <strong>of</strong> farmers with myeloma <strong>of</strong> 1.91×10 –3 . This<br />

increase is significant with a p-value <strong>of</strong> 0.009 on <strong>the</strong> one sample proportion<br />

test. The overall age range was 37-97 yrs (city 37-92 years, county<br />

44-92 years) with a median age <strong>of</strong> 69.5 years (city) versus 70.5 years<br />

(county) which is not significantly different. However <strong>the</strong> prevalence<br />

was highly significantly different between patients from city (49/100000)<br />

versus county (19/100000) with a p-value <strong>of</strong> 1.47×10 –14 indicating that living<br />

in a rural environment per se does not predispose to myeloma. Conclusions.<br />

As a central referral centre for patients from Leicester (city and<br />

county) we can confirm for <strong>the</strong> population <strong>of</strong> Leicestershire that farmers<br />

have a higher risk <strong>of</strong> developing myeloma, this is not related to just<br />

living in a rural environment.<br />

References<br />

1. Erikson M, Karlson M: Occupational and o<strong>the</strong>r environmental factors<br />

and multiple myeloma, Br J Ind Med 1992;49:95-103.<br />

2. Khuder S A, Mutgi A B: meta-analysis <strong>of</strong> multiple myeloma and farming,<br />

Am J Ind Med 1998;32:510-6.<br />

3. Baris S, Silverman D T, Brown L M et.al. Occupation, pesticide exposure<br />

and risk <strong>of</strong> multiple myeloma, Scand J Work Environ Health 2004;30:215-<br />

22.<br />

4. Viel J F, Richardson S T: Lymphoma, multiple myeloma and leukaemia<br />

among French farmers in relation to pesticide exposure, Soc Sci Med<br />

1993;37:771-7.<br />

5. Brown L M, Burmeister L F, Everett G D et.al. Pesticide exposures and<br />

multiple myeloma in Iowa, Canc Caus Control 1993;4:153-6.<br />

6. Pukkala E, Notkola V Cancer incidence among Finnish farmers, Canc<br />

Caus Control 1997;8:25-33.<br />

7. Kristensen P, Andersen A, Irgens L M et.al. Incidence and risk factors <strong>of</strong><br />

cancer among men and women in Norwegian agriculture, Scand J Work<br />

Environ Health 1996;22: 14-26<br />

8. www.leicester.gov.uk, last accessed 27/2/07<br />

9. www.leics.gov.uk, last accessed 27/2/07<br />

0680<br />

MIP-1 ALPHA AND ITS INFLUENCE ON SURVIVAL IN MYELOMA MULTIPLE PATIENTS<br />

C.O. Olivier, 1 J.M. Hernandez-Martin, 1 R.M. Fisac-Herrero, 1<br />

J.A. Queizan, 1 R. Cuello, 2 A. Barez, 3 A. Martin, 4 R. Garcia-Sanz, 5<br />

J. Garcia-Frade, 6 C. Aguilera, 7 G. Martin-Nuñez, 8<br />

T.M. Casado-Garcia, 1 J.F. San Miguel5 1 Hospital General De Segovia, SEGOVIA; 2 Hospital Clinico -Valladolid, VAL-<br />

LADOLID; 3 Hospital Ntra.Sra.de Sonsoles, AVILA; 4 Hospital General- Zamora,<br />

ZAMORA; 5 Hospital Clinico-Universitario, SALAMANCA; 6 Residencia<br />

Rio-Hortega, VALLADODLID; 7 Hospital Del Bierzo, PONFERRADA-LEON;<br />

8 Hospital Virgen del Puerto, PLASENCIA-CACERES, Spain<br />

Background. Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1alpha (MIP-1α) is a<br />

member <strong>of</strong> CC chemokine family inducing osteoclastic activity in Multiple<br />

Myeloma (MM), by a mechanism independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> classic<br />

OPG/sRANKL, that has shown its correlations with <strong>the</strong> bone disease<br />

extension and bone resorption markers. Aims. It has been previously<br />

suggested <strong>the</strong> MIP-1α prognostic value on survival. Our group communicated<br />

a similar observation in a small group with little follow-up. This<br />

is an update <strong>of</strong> this data with more cases and more follow-up. Material<br />

and Methods. 104 MM (84 with serum MIP-1 α determination) patients<br />

diagnosed in Hospitals <strong>of</strong> Castilla-Leon Community-Spain, whose<br />

serum were collected at diagnosis and stored at -80ºC. The median follow-up<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> series was 100.4 months. The serum MIP-1 α was measured<br />

by double-sandwich enzimoimmunoassay (EIA) (R&D System).<br />

We have also analyzed bone resorption markers (CTX (β-crosslaps),<br />

Crosslinks and bone formation markers (Osteocalcin (OC), bone Alkaline<br />

Phosphatase (bAP)) and serum cytokines (IL6, TNF-α, IL-1β, srIL6,<br />

HGF, VEGF, OPG and sRANKL) by EIA. Statistical Methods. Non-parametric<br />

test (U de Man Whitney, Spearman correlation); Survival curves<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kaplan-Meier were compared by long-rank, Breslow and Tarone test;<br />

Multivariate analysis was realized by Regression Cox. Results. The survival<br />

curves <strong>of</strong> our series were calculated at several follow-up times (2,<br />

3, 4, 5 and 9 years). We evaluated <strong>the</strong> impact on survival <strong>of</strong> serum MIP-<br />

1 α to separate <strong>the</strong> patients in two subgroups (lower and high) by several<br />

cut-<strong>of</strong>f points (ten percentiles). Patients with serum MIP-1 α concentrations<br />

higher than 26.6 pg/mL (percentile 40) showed worse survival<br />

at 4 and 5 years <strong>of</strong> follow-up (log-rank < 0.05; Breslow< 0.05; Tarone<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!