27.12.2012 Views

12th Congress of the European Hematology ... - Haematologica

12th Congress of the European Hematology ... - Haematologica

12th Congress of the European Hematology ... - Haematologica

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

12 th <strong>Congress</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>European</strong> <strong>Hematology</strong> Association<br />

0756<br />

HEPARIN-INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA: INCIDENCE, THROMBOTIC COMPLICATIONS<br />

AND TREATMENT<br />

E. Beggiato, F. Valeri, A. Borchiellini, C. Aguzzi, M. Bisone, F. Paciello,<br />

P.C. Schinco, M. Boccadoro<br />

Molinette Hospital, TORINO, Italy<br />

Background. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs in 0,5-<br />

5% <strong>of</strong> heparin-treated patients, is due to anti heparin/PF4 antibodies<br />

(HIT Ab) and significantly increases <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> thrombotic events. HIT<br />

related thromboses are reported in 17.5-45% <strong>of</strong> patients treated with<br />

unfractionated heparin (UFH) and 0.6-5.9% <strong>of</strong> those treated with low<br />

molecolar weight heparins (LMWH). Hallmark <strong>of</strong> HIT is <strong>the</strong> rapid<br />

decline in platelet number (5-7 days) down to less than 50% <strong>of</strong> basal value.<br />

It has recently been published that <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> HIT even in <strong>the</strong><br />

absence <strong>of</strong> thrombocytopenia, raises <strong>the</strong> risk <strong>of</strong> thrombotic events;<br />

<strong>the</strong>refore, it has been suggested in <strong>the</strong>se patients to withdraw heparin<br />

and start an alternative anticoagulant (AC) strategy even with no evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> thrombosis. Aims. Evaluation <strong>of</strong>: <strong>the</strong> incidence <strong>of</strong> thrombosis<br />

in HIT patients, <strong>the</strong> response to alternative <strong>the</strong>rapy and <strong>the</strong> role <strong>of</strong> a<br />

additional pro thrombotic risk factors. Methods. 53 patients (mean age<br />

67.2±13.9 yrs) with HIT Ab were evaluated, <strong>of</strong> whom 8 (15%) had<br />

received UFH and 45 (85%) LMWH. In <strong>the</strong> UFH group, 5 (62,5%)<br />

received prophylactic doses; in <strong>the</strong> LMWH group, 28 (62,2%) were on<br />

prophylaxis. Heparin was stopped in all patients when HIT Ab were<br />

detected. Additional risk factors were: polytrauma (3 patients), diabetes<br />

(6), coronary artery disease (15), atrial fibrillation (4), cerebral vasculopathy<br />

(4), cardiac valvular pros<strong>the</strong>sis (5), congenital thrombophilia (5), neoplasia<br />

(8). Antiphospholipid antibodies (APA) were assayed in 66% <strong>of</strong><br />

patients. After heparin withdrawal, 11 patients (23%) were started on:<br />

dermatan-sulphate (DS) (Mistral, Mediolanum, Italy), 7 (15%) DS + warfarin,<br />

6 (13%) warfarin alone, 5 (11%) antiplatelet <strong>the</strong>rapy, 1 (2%) defibrotide<br />

+ warfarin; 15 subjects (32%) received no fur<strong>the</strong>r anticoagulant<br />

treatement. 2 patients died (4%); death was related to thrombosis in 1<br />

case. Results. 6 patients (11%) in <strong>the</strong> LMWH group/prophylaxis developed<br />

HIT-associated thrombosis (4 venous and 2 arterial) and 1 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m<br />

consequently died, 2 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m had polytrauma, 1 diabetes. No patient<br />

with cancer developed thrombosis. 4/35 subjects were positive for APA;<br />

none developed thrombosis. In patients with thrombosis, mean platelet<br />

fall was 60.2% <strong>of</strong> basal value; subjects asymptomatic for thrombosis had<br />

a mean platelet fall <strong>of</strong> 53%. Conclusions. Thrombotic incidence was 11%<br />

in our group. No correlation was found between thrombosis and APA,<br />

neoplasia or o<strong>the</strong>r risk factors. No patient was treated with direct thrombin<br />

inhibitors. Alternative AC <strong>the</strong>rapy, expecially DS, showed efficacy<br />

and safety. 32% <strong>of</strong> patiens received no fur<strong>the</strong>r AC, without complications.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se results, <strong>the</strong> need for AC <strong>the</strong>rapy with lepirudin,<br />

a direct thrombin inhibitor that is approved worldwide for <strong>the</strong><br />

treatment <strong>of</strong> patients with HIT, seems questionable, expecially in those<br />

without thrombosis. Risk factors leading to thrombosis in patients with<br />

HIT remain to be elucidated.<br />

0757<br />

DETECTION OF SPECIFIC IGG ANTIBODIES IN HEPARIN-INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA<br />

TYPE II<br />

K. Schallmoser, 1 C. Drexler, 1 E. Rohde, 1 A. Groselj-Strele, 1 S. Panzer, 2<br />

G. Lanzer1 1 2 Medical University <strong>of</strong> Graz, GRAZ; Medical University <strong>of</strong> Vienna, VIENNA,<br />

Austria<br />

Background. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) is<br />

caused by antibodies (ab) against Heparin/platelet factor 4 (HPF4) complex.<br />

Commercially available ELISAs detect ab <strong>of</strong> IgG-, IgA- and IgMclass<br />

without differentiation whereas it is assumed that only IgG ab are<br />

responsible for typical clinical sequels. Aims. This study was performed<br />

to compare detection <strong>of</strong> IgG ab with two different serological assays in<br />

patients with surgical and medical diagnoses suspected for HIT II. Materials<br />

and Methods. Serum samples <strong>of</strong> 165 patients (64 surgical, 30 male;<br />

mean age 65.5 years, range 1.4-90.3; 101 medical. 41 male; mean age 66.3<br />

years, range 2.6-96.6) with clinically suspected HIT II were tested by a<br />

gel particle test (ID-PaGIA H/PF4, DiaMed, Cressier, s/Morat, Switzerland)<br />

and by ELISA (GTI PF4 HAT45, GTI, Waukesha, WI, USA) using<br />

combined anti-IgG/A/M and an anti-IgG conjugate (GTI) only. Results.<br />

The gel particle test revealed positive reactions in 39/165 patients, 35/39<br />

had positive IgG/A/M ELISA reactions, and IgG ab were detected in<br />

25/35 cases. In <strong>the</strong> group <strong>of</strong> patients with negative gel test results (n=126)<br />

we found 42 patients positive in <strong>the</strong> IgG/A/M ELISA and 12/42 had IgG<br />

282 | haematologica/<strong>the</strong> hematology journal | 2007; 92(s1)<br />

ab. A positive correlation between <strong>the</strong> gel particle test and detection <strong>of</strong><br />

IgG ab was found (phi =0.556; p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!