30 can also be held responsible for ei<strong>the</strong>r order<strong>in</strong>g or fail<strong>in</strong>g <strong>to</strong> take measures <strong>to</strong> prevent such violations from tak<strong>in</strong>g place. Individual crim<strong>in</strong>al responsibility has been fur<strong>the</strong>r developed under <strong>in</strong>ternational crim<strong>in</strong>al law, which is discussed below. The ICRC is an <strong>in</strong>dependent <strong>and</strong> neutral organization m<strong>and</strong>ated by States on <strong>the</strong> basis of IHL. Its Statute aims <strong>to</strong> provide assistance <strong>and</strong> protection <strong>to</strong> victims of armed conflict <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> promote <strong>and</strong> moni<strong>to</strong>r respect for IHL. For fur<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong>formation, see www.icrc.org © ACF - THE HUMAN RIGHT TO WATER AND SANITATION IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS
- Part 1 - International laws applicable <strong>in</strong> emergencies CHApTER 4 - RElATIONSHIp bETWEEN INTERNATIONAl HUMANITARIAN lAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS lAW 4.1. Complementarity between IHL <strong>and</strong> HRL International Humanitarian Law <strong>and</strong> <strong>human</strong> <strong>right</strong>s law are based on similar pr<strong>in</strong>ciples: <strong>to</strong> protect life, health <strong>and</strong> <strong>human</strong> dignity. However, <strong>the</strong> manner <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y seek <strong>to</strong> ensure such protection differs significantly. Thus, when conflict arises, questions emerge regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> applicability of exist<strong>in</strong>g treaties <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational agreements, especially regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>human</strong> <strong>right</strong>s. Dur<strong>in</strong>g armed conflict, most <strong>human</strong> <strong>right</strong>s obligations of States cont<strong>in</strong>ue, as do <strong>the</strong> obligations of States under International Humanitarian Law as lex specialis. IHL articulates <strong>the</strong> special <strong>right</strong>s that exist <strong>in</strong> conflict, <strong>and</strong> can be expressed as extensions (<strong>in</strong> detail) of core <strong>right</strong>s laid down <strong>in</strong> <strong>human</strong> <strong>right</strong>s treaties. 4.2. Derogations <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> application of <strong>human</strong> <strong>right</strong>s Dur<strong>in</strong>g wartime or public <strong>emergency</strong> <strong>the</strong> enjoyment of certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>human</strong> <strong>right</strong>s may be restricted. Indeed, whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> duty of <strong>the</strong> State <strong>to</strong> respect, fulfil <strong>and</strong> protect <strong>human</strong> <strong>right</strong>s applies at all times or not, under certa<strong>in</strong> narrowly def<strong>in</strong>ed circumstances, such as dur<strong>in</strong>g a declared state of <strong>emergency</strong>, <strong>the</strong> State may temporarily suspend or derogate from one or o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>human</strong> <strong>right</strong>. Such derogations are exceptional measures that are regulated under <strong>human</strong> <strong>right</strong>s law. Indeed, Article 4 of <strong>the</strong> International Covenant on Civil <strong>and</strong> Political Rights allows States <strong>to</strong> take measures temporarily suspend<strong>in</strong>g some of <strong>the</strong>ir obligations under <strong>the</strong> Covenant “<strong>in</strong> time of public <strong>emergency</strong> which threatens <strong>the</strong> life of <strong>the</strong> nation” , but only “<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> extent strictly required by <strong>the</strong> exigencies of <strong>the</strong> situation” . Such a situation is def<strong>in</strong>ed as someth<strong>in</strong>g that threatens <strong>the</strong> political <strong>in</strong>dependence or terri<strong>to</strong>rial <strong>in</strong>tegrity of <strong>the</strong> State, or <strong>the</strong> physical safety of its population. Internal disturbances, war <strong>and</strong> natural disasters can be said <strong>to</strong> be examples of such public emergencies whereby a State may suspend <strong>human</strong> <strong>right</strong>s for a limited duration because normal measures are <strong>in</strong>adequate <strong>to</strong> address its concerns. 4.3. Some <strong>human</strong> <strong>right</strong>s can never be suspended Despite <strong>the</strong> possibility of derogat<strong>in</strong>g from certa<strong>in</strong> obligations under <strong>the</strong> ICCPR, Article 4 also specifies that certa<strong>in</strong> <strong>right</strong>s may never be suspended 25 . Interest<strong>in</strong>gly, <strong>the</strong>re is no provision <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Covenant on Economic, Social <strong>and</strong> Cultural Rights that allows for derogation. Therefore, economic, social <strong>and</strong> cultural <strong>right</strong>s are applicable also dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>emergency</strong> <strong>situations</strong>. A State must at least ensure access <strong>to</strong> <strong>right</strong>s essential <strong>to</strong> survival, such as food <strong>and</strong> <strong>water</strong>, basic shelter, medical services <strong>and</strong> <strong>sanitation</strong> <strong>and</strong> request <strong>in</strong>ternational assistance when its resources are <strong>in</strong>sufficient. In addition, derogations do not allow suspension of obligations laid down by International Humanitarian Law. Moreover, Article 3 common <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> four Geneva Conventions provides that <strong>in</strong> times of armed conflict, persons protected by <strong>the</strong> conventions should “<strong>in</strong> all circumstances be treated <strong>human</strong>ely, without any adverse dist<strong>in</strong>ction founded on race, colour, religion or faith, sex, birth or wealth, or any o<strong>the</strong>r similar criteria” . 25 / Article 4.2 of <strong>the</strong> ICCPR lists <strong>the</strong> <strong>right</strong>s that States may not suspend even dur<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>emergency</strong>: Right <strong>to</strong> life; Right <strong>to</strong> freedom of thought, conscience <strong>and</strong> religion; Prohibition of genocide; Prohibition of <strong>to</strong>rture or cruel, <strong>in</strong><strong>human</strong> or degrad<strong>in</strong>g treatment or punishment; Prohibition of slavery; The <strong>right</strong> <strong>to</strong> due process of law; The prohibition of punishment for any act that was not a crime when act was committed © ACF - THE HUMAN RIGHT TO WATER AND SANITATION IN EMERGENCY SITUATIONS 31