16.01.2013 Views

ets exposure, lung cancer - Legacy Tobacco Documents Library

ets exposure, lung cancer - Legacy Tobacco Documents Library

ets exposure, lung cancer - Legacy Tobacco Documents Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

of the study, inereased risk of hmg <strong>cancer</strong><br />

from adult ETS <strong>exposure</strong> was stronger<br />

for adenocsrcinoma of the <strong>lung</strong> than for<br />

al7 cell types combined? That ffnding is no<br />

longer apparent with the additional cases<br />

of each cell type . Although the estimates<br />

of RR for pulmonary adenocarcinoma are<br />

not different from tHose for other cell<br />

types, adenocarcinoma of the <strong>lung</strong> is by<br />

far the predominant cell type diagnosed<br />

in women with <strong>lung</strong> <strong>cancer</strong> who are lifetime<br />

nonsmokers, and oo the ef5ects of<br />

ETS <strong>exposure</strong> may be particularly rel•<br />

evant for this histopathologic cell type .'<br />

More than 75% of the cases in this study<br />

were diagnosed with prim.v-yy pulmonary<br />

a.denecarcinoma, twice the proportion of<br />

adenocareinoma of the <strong>lung</strong> diagnosed in<br />

all US women without regard to smoking<br />

history: 37% among female <strong>lung</strong> <strong>cancer</strong><br />

cases in the SEER program .° In other<br />

studies of E'I5 in female nonsmokers in<br />

which histopathology was reported, adwnlocstrcinoma<br />

comprised 60 K or more of<br />

nll cases in six of nine studies .L'"'6' ' In<br />

the other three studies, the proportion of<br />

udenocarcinotna cases ranged from 43%<br />

Ro 549E ." 1' Differences in the physical and<br />

themical properties of sidestream smoke<br />

compared with mainstream smoke, including<br />

the distnbution of the vapor and particulate<br />

phases and the concentration of<br />

Imov.-n or suspected carcinogens!' combined<br />

uith ditferences in inhalation, nasal<br />

vs oral, may yield a higher proportion of<br />

peripheral adenoatranomas .u<br />

Ddisclassification of disease status was<br />

minimized in this study by the eligibility<br />

rriteria (microscopic diagnosis required)<br />

and an independent review of diagnostic<br />

ataterial that was completed for 85% of<br />

the cases . The amall proportion of cases<br />

found ineligtble by independent review<br />

may result from the populat.ion•based tumor<br />

registry affiliation of four of the five<br />

study cent.ers. The consistency of the findings<br />

w-ith and without nonreviewed cases<br />

supports the contention that the study<br />

results were not measurably altered by<br />

incluaion of ineligible caees .<br />

Misclassification of eversmoker6 as lifetime<br />

never smokers is more problematic .<br />

'I11e objective of this study was to evalu•<br />

ate the risk of <strong>lung</strong> <strong>cancer</strong> in women who<br />

had never smoked . At present there is no<br />

known biomarker of lifetime tobacco use .<br />

Cotinine, the major metabolite of nicotine,<br />

is the most widely accepted biomarker<br />

of current (I to 2 days) tobacco<br />

<strong>exposure</strong> and is useful for distinguishing<br />

current active 6wrukers from current nonainokers<br />

.'"' The proportion of reported<br />

nartsntokersin the present study with a<br />

cotininelcreatinine concentration above<br />

100 nghng was 1 .9%, the same proportion<br />

vrith a concentration above 100 nghng<br />

obeerved in a 10-country, multicenter<br />

study of self-reported ETS eupo6ure"<br />

.lAMN, Jwte 8, 1 ;W-VO( 271, No 22<br />

http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/wyk81f00/pdf<br />

TaM. 7--Aauoaanon gfiww Rrk 0t Lunq C .nar sna AdAawod S+rwk.-Y ..n d Expu>r. Amx,q<br />

/lonunoWnO wom.n•<br />

~~<br />

~ cn,a. oa aeWs+ .e on<br />

c., .. oo araft tts+. Co (ss+ cu<br />

aJ1 t.,Rq C.rtMnww (Aw IL.poneenb)<br />

0 ,6 tte 100<br />

1•11 74 299 076(050-116i<br />

122e 136 307 111 (0755163)<br />

29-47 163 3W 12 .(0eA . 1 921<br />

a+6 163 265 1 $10 .03•2 .23)1<br />

Adenoc+rdnae . (AM OLepen6r++tt)<br />

Tnntl fi . 0001<br />

0 36 11e 1 .00 . .<br />

1•11 6. 239 0 7< (o 46L1 19)<br />

1226 1io K7 1 .17(076•1 e1)<br />

20.r7 112 304 121 (07'6•166)<br />

n46 130 M 1 .61 (1 .0b217)1<br />

TnM A. 0002<br />

()Hu . N/lqoiopkal Typ.s (N( /I+spondvrtn)<br />

0 12 118 100 _ 100<br />

100<br />

062(052•1 .29)<br />

112(o7S17o)<br />

135(oe420a)<br />

1 .74 (1 14-2 65)1<br />

Trtntl P. 0001<br />

1,00<br />

074 (0 .•u .1 23)<br />

1 .15 (o 73-1 tJt<br />

119(0e1•20a)<br />

1 77 (112•2 6011<br />

Tnrd H. 0001<br />

20 239 0e2(039-174) 117(052•262)<br />

122e 26 307 090(o4t-162) 1001oA621e ;<br />

24-a7 41 304 1,33(067•261) 1 .58(076331)<br />

:i6 13 265 1 .Y.!(061•216) 1 .76(063.375)<br />

Teur.tl P. 12 TrmO W 05<br />

Aut u" C«otr,a>re ".w~onse(w or+ly)<br />

0 30 11e 1,00 1 .00<br />

;.11 53 238 00E(051•15A) 079(0W 42)<br />

12•2e 103 306 1 .32 (06t•210) 1 20 (0'A•1 94)<br />

2D-~ 7 110 304 112(09ti223) 14+(ot4231)<br />

:a6 105 265 1,56 (0,9cS•2 47) 1 .67 (1 B3•2 70tt<br />

0<br />

1•11<br />

122e<br />

29-47<br />

:i6<br />

AA.norarcMm .n . (s.n+wva,Wa o„H)<br />

TMr+tl P . 002 Tnrb h 0006<br />

23 11e 100 . . 100<br />

A1 236 0 66 (o 5} 1") 0 D 1(0 46,1 , 37)<br />

a6 306 1 46 (o 99•2 45) 1 31 (0 77•2 22)<br />

62 304 1,36(0f.1230) 139 to624 361<br />

91 265 1 76 (1 .06-2 02)1 115 (7 0P3 15)1<br />

Tnnd Fr,001 7rOrd 0. 0005<br />

om« rrwo1optu( Tw« (aas4. .PONOOP" onM)<br />

0 7 116 100 . . . 1 00<br />

1•11 12 236 0a5(031222) 0 91 (0 3A•2 .5)<br />

12•2e ls ao6 o 93 (0 .33•2 06) 062(031•216)<br />

29~7 ~ 304 1 55 (o 66•3 65) 1Ft (0674 03)<br />

14 2a5 0 69 (0 .35•226) 1 12 (o 42r2 96)<br />

TrMO R 49 Twntl P= 32<br />

'Atltuttod br p! . fTp* autly .rN *dY'.11qn. hUR{ . vpartbltt . >/Rtl uuryp+rmfnW VumA r1Wx bftay<br />

dw4surd, s.mry trstory d Mq umr, .nC .mpay*r»m n r,pn-rwK aoa.prba>t OFi rdcws oilos reeo . CI .<br />

oon6cs.np rr .naW<br />

tp< .os<br />

A higher proportion of controle than<br />

cases was exc]uded from the study s6 a<br />

result of elevated ooncentrations of urinary<br />

cotinineJcreatinine, 2.3% vs 0 .6% .<br />

(',ases were klenti4ed at ho6pitals, and<br />

aaeedng of medical records and physieLUU<br />

about the patient's current and past<br />

use of tobaxo preceded the screening by<br />

telephone and at the interview for all 6Ux1yy<br />

subjecw .'Itiia procedure may have eliminated<br />

some curnent amokers from the case<br />

series who would have been inclined to<br />

self-report as nonamokers in an interview<br />

format. Alternatively, some cases who<br />

would miareport smoking status may be<br />

less likely, because of health status, to be<br />

actively antddng and less &ceh• to be revealed<br />

than healthy, free-living controls .<br />

Other data suggest that <strong>lung</strong> <strong>cancer</strong> aa

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!