24.01.2013 Views

THE ARCANE SCHOOLS - Fort Myers Beach Masonic Lodge No. 362

THE ARCANE SCHOOLS - Fort Myers Beach Masonic Lodge No. 362

THE ARCANE SCHOOLS - Fort Myers Beach Masonic Lodge No. 362

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

e collected and collated, a number having already been burned by<br />

scrupulous Masons to prevent their falling into strange hands. In<br />

1721, Grand Master Montagu found fault with the _Old Charges_ as being<br />

inadequate, and ordered Dr. Anderson to make a digest of them with a<br />

view to formulating a better set of regulations for the rule of the<br />

<strong>Lodge</strong>s. Anderson obeyed--he seems to have been engaged in such a work<br />

already, and may have suggested the idea to the Grand Master--and a<br />

committee of fourteen "learned brethren" was appointed to examine the<br />

MS and make report. They suggested a few amendments, and the book was<br />

ordered published by the Grand Master, appearing in the latter part of<br />

1723. This first issue, however, did not contain the account of the<br />

organization of the Grand <strong>Lodge</strong>, which does not seem to have been<br />

added until the edition of 1738. How much Past Grand Master Payne had<br />

to do with this work is not certain, but the chief credit is due to<br />

Dr. Anderson, who deserves the perpetual gratitude of the order--the<br />

more so if he it was who wrote the article, already quoted, setting<br />

forth the religious attitude of the order. That article, by whomsoever<br />

written, is one of the great documents of mankind, and it would be an<br />

added joy to know that it was penned by a minister.[122] The _Book of<br />

Constitutions_, which is still the groundwork of Masonry, has been<br />

printed in many editions, and is accessible to every one.<br />

Another event in the story of the Grand <strong>Lodge</strong>, never to be forgotten,<br />

was a plan started in 1724 of raising funds of General Charity for<br />

distressed Masons. Proposed by the Earl of Dalkeith, it at once met<br />

with enthusiastic support, and it is a curious coincidence that one of<br />

the first to petition for relief was Anthony Sayer, first Grand<br />

Master. The minutes do not state whether he was relieved at that time,<br />

but we know that sums of money were voted to him in 1730, and again in<br />

1741. This Board of Benevolence, as it came to be called, became very<br />

important, it being unanimously agreed in 1733 that all such business<br />

as could not be conveniently despatched by the Quarterly Communication<br />

should be referred to it. Also, that all Masters of Regular <strong>Lodge</strong>s,<br />

together with all present, former, and future Grand Officers should be<br />

members of the Board. Later this Board was still further empowered to<br />

hear complaints and to report thereon to the Grand <strong>Lodge</strong>. Let it also<br />

be noted that in actual practice the Board of Charity gave free play<br />

to one of the most admirable principles of Masonry--helping the needy<br />

and unfortunate, whether within the order or without.<br />

III<br />

Once more we come to a much debated question, about which not a little<br />

has been written, and most of it wide of the mark--the question of the<br />

origin of the Third Degree. Here again students have gone hither and<br />

yon hunting in every cranny for the motif of this degree, and it would<br />

seem that their failure to find it would by this time have turned them<br />

back to the only place where they may ever hope to discover it--in<br />

Masonry itself. But no; they are bound to bring mystics, occultists,<br />

alchemists, Culdees or Cabalists--even the _Vehmgerichte_ of<br />

Germany--into the making of Masonry somewhere, if only for the sake of<br />

glamor, and this is the last opportunity to do it.[123] Willing to<br />

give due credit to Cabalists and Rosicrucians, the present writer<br />

rejects all such theories on the ground that there is no reason for<br />

thinking that they helped to make Masonry, _much less any fact to<br />

prove it_.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!