24.01.2013 Views

THE ARCANE SCHOOLS - Fort Myers Beach Masonic Lodge No. 362

THE ARCANE SCHOOLS - Fort Myers Beach Masonic Lodge No. 362

THE ARCANE SCHOOLS - Fort Myers Beach Masonic Lodge No. 362

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

In the first place they have a right to install their successors, and<br />

at<br />

all times subsequent to their installation to be present at the<br />

ceremony<br />

of installing Masters of lodges. I should scarcely have deemed it<br />

necessary to dwell upon so self-evident a proposition, were it not that<br />

it<br />

involves the discussion of a question which has of late years been<br />

warmly<br />

mooted in some jurisdictions, namely, whether this right of being<br />

present<br />

at an installation should, or should not, be extended to Past Masters,<br />

made in Royal Arch Chapters.<br />

In view of the fact, that there are two very different kinds of<br />

possessors<br />

of the same degree, the Grand <strong>Lodge</strong> of England has long since<br />

distinguished them as "virtual" and as "actual" Past Masters. The terms<br />

are sufficiently explicit, and have the advantage of enabling us to<br />

avoid<br />

circumlocution, and I shall, therefore, adopt them.<br />

An _actual Past Master_ is one who has been regularly installed to<br />

preside<br />

over a symbolic lodge under the jurisdiction of a Grand <strong>Lodge</strong>. A<br />

_virtual<br />

Past Master_ is one who has received the degree in a chapter, for the<br />

purpose of qualifying him for exaltation to the Royal Arch.<br />

<strong>No</strong>w the question to be considered is this. Can a virtual Past Master be<br />

permitted to be present at the installation of an actual Past Master?<br />

The Committee of Correspondence of New York, in 1851, announced the<br />

doctrine, that a Chapter, or virtual Past Master, cannot legally<br />

install<br />

the Master of a Symbolic <strong>Lodge</strong>; but that there is no rule forbidding<br />

his<br />

being present at the ceremony. This doctrine has been accepted by<br />

several<br />

Grand <strong>Lodge</strong>s, while others again refuse to admit the presence of a<br />

virtual<br />

Past Master at the installation-service.<br />

In South Carolina, for instance, by uninterrupted usage, virtual Past<br />

Masters are excluded from the ceremony of installation.<br />

In Louisiana, under the high authority of the late Brother Gedge, it is<br />

asserted, that "it is the bounden duty of all Grand <strong>Lodge</strong>s to prevent<br />

the<br />

possessors of the (chapter) degree from the exercise of any function<br />

appertaining to the office and attributes of an installed Master of a<br />

lodge of Symbolic Masonry, and refuse to recognize them as belonging to<br />

the order of Past Masters."[88]<br />

Brother Albert Pike, whose opinion on masonic jurisprudence is entitled<br />

to

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!