24.01.2013 Views

THE ARCANE SCHOOLS - Fort Myers Beach Masonic Lodge No. 362

THE ARCANE SCHOOLS - Fort Myers Beach Masonic Lodge No. 362

THE ARCANE SCHOOLS - Fort Myers Beach Masonic Lodge No. 362

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The only objection to it is one which must be urged, not by the Order,<br />

but<br />

by the individual. It is, that his duties and his responsibilities are<br />

thus multiplied, as well as his expenses. If he is willing to incur all<br />

this additional weight in running his race of Masonry, it is not for<br />

others to resist this exuberance of zeal. The Mason, however, who is<br />

affiliated with more than one lodge, must remember that he is subject<br />

to<br />

the independent jurisdiction of each; may for the same offense be tried<br />

in<br />

each, and, although acquitted by all except one, that, if convicted by<br />

that one, his conviction will, if he be suspended or expelled, work his<br />

suspension or expulsion in all the others.<br />

Chapter VII.<br />

Of Demitting.<br />

To demit from a lodge is to resign one's membership, on which occasion<br />

a<br />

certificate of good standing and a release from all dues is given to<br />

the<br />

applicant, which is technically called a _demit_.<br />

The right to demit or resign never has, until within a few years, been<br />

denied. In 1853, the Grand <strong>Lodge</strong> of Connecticut adopted a regulation<br />

"that<br />

no lodge should grant a demit to any of its members, except for the<br />

purpose of joining some other lodge; and that no member shall be<br />

considered as having withdrawn from one lodge until he has actually<br />

become<br />

a member of another." Similar regulations have been either adopted or<br />

proposed by a few other Grand <strong>Lodge</strong>s, but I much doubt both their<br />

expediency and their legality. This compulsory method of keeping<br />

Masons,<br />

after they have once been made, seems to me to be as repugnant to the<br />

voluntary character of our institution as would be a compulsory mode of<br />

making them in the beginning. The expediency of such a regulation is<br />

also<br />

highly questionable. Every candidate is required to come to our doors<br />

"of<br />

his own free will and accord," and surely we should desire to keep none<br />

among us after that free will is no longer felt. We are all familiar<br />

with<br />

the Hudibrastic adage, that<br />

"A man convinced against his will,<br />

Is of the same opinion still,"<br />

and he who is no longer actuated by that ardent esteem for the<br />

institution

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!