24.01.2013 Views

THE ARCANE SCHOOLS - Fort Myers Beach Masonic Lodge No. 362

THE ARCANE SCHOOLS - Fort Myers Beach Masonic Lodge No. 362

THE ARCANE SCHOOLS - Fort Myers Beach Masonic Lodge No. 362

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

will it be contended that, on his leaving the lodge-room pursuant to<br />

his<br />

sentence, he leaves not to return to it on the succeeding<br />

communication,<br />

unless a vote should permit him? Certainly not. His punishment of<br />

dismissal for one night had been executed; and on the succeeding night<br />

he<br />

reentered into the possession of all his rights. But if he can do so<br />

after<br />

a dismissal or suspension of one night, why not after one or three, six<br />

or<br />

twelve months? The time is extended, but the principle remains the<br />

same.<br />

But the doctrine, that after the expiration of the term of a definite<br />

suspension, an action by the lodge is still necessary to a complete<br />

restoration, is capable of producing much mischief and oppression. For,<br />

if<br />

the lodge not only has a right, but is under the necessity of taking up<br />

the case anew, and deciding whether the person who had been suspended<br />

for<br />

three months, and whose period of suspension has expired, shall now be<br />

restored, it follows, that the members of the lodge, in the course of<br />

their inquiry, are permitted to come to such conclusion as they may<br />

think<br />

just and fit; for to say that they, after all their deliberations, are,<br />

to<br />

vote only in one way, would be too absurd to require any consideration.<br />

They may, therefore, decide that A.B., having undergone the sentence of<br />

the lodge, shall be restored, and then of course all would be well, and<br />

no<br />

more is to be said. But suppose that they decide otherwise, and say<br />

that<br />

A.B., having undergone the sentence of suspension of three months,<br />

_shall<br />

not_ be restored, but must remain suspended until further orders. Here,<br />

then, a party would have been punished a second time for the same<br />

offense,<br />

and that, too, after having suffered what, at the time of his<br />

conviction,<br />

was supposed to be a competent punishment--and without a trial, and<br />

without the necessary opportunities of defense, again found guilty, and<br />

his comparatively light punishment of suspension for three months<br />

changed<br />

into a severer one, and of an indefinite period. The annals of the most<br />

arbitrary government in the world--the history of the most despotic<br />

tyrant<br />

that ever lived--could not show an instance of more unprincipled<br />

violation<br />

of law and justice than this. And yet it may naturally be the result of<br />

the doctrine, that in a sentence of definite suspension, the party can<br />

be<br />

restored only by a vote of the lodge at the expiration of his term of<br />

suspension. If the lodge can restore him, it can as well refuse to<br />

restore<br />

him, and to refuse to restore him would be to inflict a new punishment<br />

upon him for an old and atoned-for offense.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!