You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
“SALE” is such a performative utterance, then the seasonal sale has<br />
to be a procedure with a predetermined result in which the word “sale”<br />
is uttered at the right moment, in our case at the end of the season.<br />
People and circumstances have to fit the evoked procedure. All those<br />
involved have to execute it fully and in the right way. And finally, when<br />
opinions and feelings are expressed during the procedure, all those<br />
involved have to intend to behave according to these expressions. At<br />
the end, all the people involved must behave as intended. Should any<br />
one of these six rules be violated, the performative utterance would<br />
fail. “SALE” means that the seasonal collection of the past season is<br />
no more in fashion. According to Austin, the sale can fail, for example,<br />
when the seasonal sale is not announced at the end of the season.<br />
When one single store announces the seasonal sale a few weeks before<br />
Christmas, it could confuse the customer for it is not the time set<br />
for it. Neither would it work if we were to enter a shop and proclaim<br />
“sale”, for it is the retailer who utters the words not the customer.<br />
Austin gives another example of misuse where the procedure fails. He<br />
hypothesises that if we happen to be at a ship’s christening ceremony<br />
to which we are not invited, take a bottle, smash it against the ship<br />
and give it a wrong name, the performative gesture would fail because<br />
although we fulfilled all the formal criteria we were not responsible for<br />
naming it. 484 The same happens when a new collection is introduced.<br />
“NEW” is also a performative utterance. Like Austin’s speech acts, the<br />
“new” also changes social reality. People who wear the new things are<br />
in fashion; they find this fashion good, because it is new. The interesting<br />
thing about performative utterances is that they are neither right<br />
nor wrong. They are either accepted or they are not. 485 And the same<br />
has to be considered for rituals. Stanley Tambiah referred to Austin’s<br />
speech acts in his performative theory of the ritual:<br />
“Ritual is a culturally constructed system of symbolic communication.<br />
It is constituted of patterned and ordered sequences of words<br />
and acts, often expressed in multiple media, whose content and<br />
arrangement are characterised in varying degree by formality<br />
(conventionality), stereotypy (rigidity), condensation (fusion), and<br />
redundancy (repetition). Ritual action in its constitutive features<br />
is performative in these three senses: in the Austinian sense of<br />
performative wherein saying something is also doing something as a<br />
conventional act; in the quite different sense of a staged performance<br />
that uses multiple media by which the participants experience the<br />
484 Austin (1986:23).<br />
485 Ibid., p. 153.<br />
The<br />
Death<br />
of<br />
Fashion 191