10.02.2013 Views

vienna

vienna

vienna

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

“SALE” is such a performative utterance, then the seasonal sale has<br />

to be a procedure with a predetermined result in which the word “sale”<br />

is uttered at the right moment, in our case at the end of the season.<br />

People and circumstances have to fit the evoked procedure. All those<br />

involved have to execute it fully and in the right way. And finally, when<br />

opinions and feelings are expressed during the procedure, all those<br />

involved have to intend to behave according to these expressions. At<br />

the end, all the people involved must behave as intended. Should any<br />

one of these six rules be violated, the performative utterance would<br />

fail. “SALE” means that the seasonal collection of the past season is<br />

no more in fashion. According to Austin, the sale can fail, for example,<br />

when the seasonal sale is not announced at the end of the season.<br />

When one single store announces the seasonal sale a few weeks before<br />

Christmas, it could confuse the customer for it is not the time set<br />

for it. Neither would it work if we were to enter a shop and proclaim<br />

“sale”, for it is the retailer who utters the words not the customer.<br />

Austin gives another example of misuse where the procedure fails. He<br />

hypothesises that if we happen to be at a ship’s christening ceremony<br />

to which we are not invited, take a bottle, smash it against the ship<br />

and give it a wrong name, the performative gesture would fail because<br />

although we fulfilled all the formal criteria we were not responsible for<br />

naming it. 484 The same happens when a new collection is introduced.<br />

“NEW” is also a performative utterance. Like Austin’s speech acts, the<br />

“new” also changes social reality. People who wear the new things are<br />

in fashion; they find this fashion good, because it is new. The interesting<br />

thing about performative utterances is that they are neither right<br />

nor wrong. They are either accepted or they are not. 485 And the same<br />

has to be considered for rituals. Stanley Tambiah referred to Austin’s<br />

speech acts in his performative theory of the ritual:<br />

“Ritual is a culturally constructed system of symbolic communication.<br />

It is constituted of patterned and ordered sequences of words<br />

and acts, often expressed in multiple media, whose content and<br />

arrangement are characterised in varying degree by formality<br />

(conventionality), stereotypy (rigidity), condensation (fusion), and<br />

redundancy (repetition). Ritual action in its constitutive features<br />

is performative in these three senses: in the Austinian sense of<br />

performative wherein saying something is also doing something as a<br />

conventional act; in the quite different sense of a staged performance<br />

that uses multiple media by which the participants experience the<br />

484 Austin (1986:23).<br />

485 Ibid., p. 153.<br />

The<br />

Death<br />

of<br />

Fashion 191

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!