18.02.2013 Views

Timing, hosts and locations of (grouped) events of NanoImpactNet

Timing, hosts and locations of (grouped) events of NanoImpactNet

Timing, hosts and locations of (grouped) events of NanoImpactNet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

distinguishes between the interaction <strong>of</strong> particulate <strong>and</strong> soluble Zn<br />

with the membrane surface.<br />

Figure 4: Shows Oscillatoria princeps incubated with<br />

SiO2. Cells separated by septa (arrowed). Right<br />

filament partially covered by SiO2, left filament<br />

completely covered.<br />

A simple geometric model (see Figure 5) has been developed to<br />

describe the adsorption <strong>of</strong> particles on to a supported membrane.<br />

The model is directly transposed from the experimental data <strong>of</strong> the<br />

packing <strong>of</strong> silica nanoparticles on to a supported membrane. The<br />

model has one adjustable parameter which is the maximum<br />

distance between the particle surface <strong>and</strong> the DOPC layer where<br />

there is an interaction between the particle <strong>and</strong> the DOPC.<br />

Figure 5.<br />

(a) Model (top view) <strong>of</strong><br />

silica nanoparticles<br />

binding to DOPC is<br />

presented in this picture.<br />

(b) Triangle ABC, where<br />

AB=AC=BC=2R <strong>and</strong> A,B <strong>and</strong><br />

C are the centres <strong>of</strong> three<br />

nanoparticles abutting<br />

each other in (a).<br />

(c) Vertical section<br />

through (b) showing<br />

nanoparticle touching the<br />

DOPC surface at point A, h<br />

is 'interfacial layer<br />

thickness'.<br />

(d) Model (horizontal<br />

sectional view) <strong>of</strong><br />

nanoparticles bound to<br />

DOPC showing radius, r, <strong>of</strong><br />

'interfacial contact area'.<br />

WP3: Interactions with in vitro models. These studies are directed<br />

to nanoparticle interactions at both the cellular level <strong>and</strong> the tissue<br />

level. The test systems will be established on in vitro models. The<br />

cellular level will include test systems ranging from tissues <strong>and</strong><br />

cultured cells to DNA. The tissue level includes nerve axons from<br />

the squid consisting <strong>of</strong> a single axon <strong>and</strong> glia, <strong>and</strong> ascidian embryos<br />

(rapidly developing chordate embryos to 12 hrs). The principle is to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> how the nanoparticles affect the structure <strong>and</strong><br />

function <strong>of</strong> these systems using both real time assays <strong>and</strong> electron<br />

microscopy. The in vitro work is led by Anton Dohrn <strong>and</strong> is spread<br />

NanoSafetyCluster - Compendium 2012<br />

between Anton Dohrn <strong>and</strong> Leeds (WP 3). Anton Dohrn has<br />

extensive facilities in electron microscopy <strong>and</strong> biophysical <strong>and</strong><br />

molecular biological techniques <strong>and</strong> considerable world expertise<br />

in electrophysiology.<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the most exciting recent work carried out by WP3 has<br />

been on the effect <strong>of</strong> ZnO particles on membrane proteins. NPs<br />

provided by WP2 were tested directly on HEK cells that<br />

heterologously express the hERG K + channel. This gave us the<br />

opportunity <strong>of</strong> assessing the impact <strong>of</strong> the NPs on defined<br />

membrane proteins directly. The range <strong>of</strong> concentrations used was<br />

0.1-10 mg ml -1 for both SiO 2 (dialyzed <strong>and</strong> non -dialyzed) <strong>and</strong> ZnO.<br />

Cells were held at -70 mV under voltage clamp <strong>and</strong> hERG K +<br />

channels were activated by patterns <strong>of</strong> voltage steps which<br />

produced outward ionic currents which were subject to biophysical<br />

analysis (Figure 6). The channel activity was stable for at least an<br />

hour without run- down although experiments were normally<br />

carried out in the first 20 minutes. Examination <strong>of</strong> the hERG current<br />

kinetics (activation / inactivation <strong>and</strong> peak currents revealed no<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> SiO 2 up to 10 mg mL -1 but a notable selective effect <strong>of</strong> ZnO<br />

on channel kinetics (Figure 6). To establish if this effect was due to<br />

release <strong>of</strong> Zn 2+ ions from the NPs, we carried out experiments<br />

where increasing concentrations <strong>of</strong> ZnCl 2 were added <strong>and</strong> the peak<br />

currents measured. As can be seen in Figure 7, increasing the<br />

concentration <strong>of</strong> Zn 2+ begins to block the channel only in the mM<br />

range. The effect <strong>of</strong> the NPs in Figure 6 is the opposite to this, i.e.<br />

they increase the current. Therefore the NP effect cannot be due<br />

to residual Zn 2+ .<br />

Figure 6. ZnO removes the fast inactivation <strong>of</strong> hERG <strong>and</strong> is so doing<br />

increases the amplitude <strong>of</strong> the current at positive voltages. The<br />

graph shows the extracted values for current voltage relations <strong>of</strong><br />

the steady state K + current under different voltage steps.<br />

Figure 7. Dose response <strong>of</strong> hERG peak currents in various<br />

concentrations <strong>of</strong> Zn 2+ . The EC 50 <strong>of</strong> Zn 2+ on hERG is estimated<br />

to be <strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> 1 mM. The results represent the mean<br />

<strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation <strong>of</strong> results from at least five<br />

experiments.<br />

Compendium <strong>of</strong> Projects in the European NanoSafety Cluster 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!