03.06.2016 Views

Doc Español-Ingles_opt

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C05356748<br />

PPROVED FOR RELEASE DATE: .<br />

3-Mar-2016<br />

Secret<br />

NOFORN.:.MOG6i+ 1 RAff­<br />

-OXC6N<br />

Military development will continue to suffer from budget constraints.<br />

Furthermore, with no significant military industries or alternative suppliers,<br />

the government will probably have to continue to spend a large<br />

proportion of US aid on ammunition and other expendibles at the expense<br />

of longer term investments in military hardware and training. We expect<br />

financial pressures to grow as the war intensifies, the payroll expands, loans<br />

come due, and medical and death benefits burgeon.<br />

Since a breakthrough appears unlikely on the battlefield over the short<br />

term, political factors may hold the key to the strategic balance. The<br />

actions of the new Christian Democratic government of Napoleon Duarte<br />

will influence both the level of US aid and the amount of attention the defense<br />

leadership gives to the war effort. Certainly, continued indications<br />

that the armed forces are resigned to a new relationship with civil authority<br />

would permit military leaders to concentrate more fully on the war; m;1 the<br />

other hand, if top leaders become preoccupied with political events in San<br />

Salvador for an extended period of time, they would be unable to<br />

orchestrate combat actions, and potential tactical opportunities could lie<br />

dissipated.<br />

Washington's leverage in further accelerating the development of the<br />

Salvadoran armed forces is constrained by Salvadoran culture and institutions.<br />

Considerable strides have been made in the technical modernization<br />

of the Salvadoran military, but, in our judgment, leadership attitudes and<br />

institutional procedures still require significant additional changes to meet<br />

the guerrilla threat. These have shown the least improvement over the past<br />

few years, both because of the slow pace of institutional evolution and<br />

sensitivity over the US role. Recent reorganization and reassignments of<br />

military commanders, combined with changes in civilian leadership as a<br />

result of the 1984 elections, may result in some acceleration of the needed<br />

changes.<br />

We believe US pressure to promote force development can, if not carefully<br />

orchestrated, strain El Salvador's capacity to absorb new technology and<br />

force-management ideas and nurture a counterproductive dependence on<br />

the United States. Greatly expanded or more sophisticated assistance<br />

would probably require the United States to increase its advisory presence<br />

substantially to enable the Salvadorans to make use of the aid, thus risking<br />

leaving Salvadoran officers feeling that they were not in control and<br />

weakening the resolve of the High Command ..<br />

This illformation is~<br />

v

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!