90MANACHINI, B.; CORSINI, A.; BOCCHI, S. Soil quality indicators as affected by along term barley-maize and maize cropping syst<strong>em</strong>s. Italian Journal <strong>of</strong> Agronomy,v. 1, p. 15-22, 2000.MATTOS, J.K.A. Caracterização das comunida<strong>de</strong>s <strong>de</strong> n<strong>em</strong>atói<strong>de</strong>s <strong>em</strong> oito sist<strong>em</strong>as<strong>de</strong> uso da terra nos cerrados do Brasil Central. Tese <strong>de</strong> Doutorado. Universida<strong>de</strong><strong>de</strong> Brasília, 113 p.MATTOS, J.K.A.; HUANG, S.P.; PIMENTEL, C.M.R.M. Grupos tróficos dacomunida<strong>de</strong> <strong>de</strong> n<strong>em</strong>atoi<strong>de</strong>s do solo <strong>em</strong> oito sist<strong>em</strong>as <strong>de</strong> uso da terra nos cerradosdo Brasil central. N<strong>em</strong>atologia Brasileira, v. 30, n. 3, p. 267-273, 2006.MENDOZA, R. B.; FRANTI, T. G., DORAN, J. W. Tillage effects on soil qualityindicators and n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong> abundance in loessial soil un<strong>de</strong>r long-term no-tillproduction. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, v. 39, n. 13–14,p. 2169–2190, 2008.MENG, F.; OU, W.; LI, Q.; JIANG, Y.; WEN, D. Vertical distribution and seasonalfluctuation <strong>of</strong> n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong> trophic groups as affected by land use. Pedosphere, v. 16,n. 2, p. 169-176, 2006MIELNICZUK, J.; BAYER, C.; VEZZANI, F.M.; LOVATO, T.; FERNANDES, F.F.;BEBARBA, L. Manejo <strong>de</strong> solo e <strong>culturas</strong> e sua relação com os estoques <strong>de</strong> carbonoe nitrogênio do solo. In: CURI, N.; MARQUES, J.J.; GUILHERME, L.R.G.; LIMA,J.M.; LOPES, A.S.; ALVAREZ V., V.H. Tópicos <strong>em</strong> ciência do solo. Viçosa, MG,Socieda<strong>de</strong> Brasileira <strong>de</strong> Ciência do Solo, v.3. p.209-248. 2003.MIKOLA, J. Effect <strong>of</strong> microbivore species composition and basal resource enrichmenton trophic level biomasses in an experimental microbial based soil food web.Oceologia, v. 117, n. 3, p. 396-403, 1998.MIKOLA, J.; SETALA, H. No evi<strong>de</strong>nce <strong>of</strong> trophic casca<strong>de</strong>s in an experimentalmicrobial based soil food web. Ecology, v.79, n.1, p.153-164, 1998.MINOSHIMA H.; JACKSON, L. E.; CAVAGNARO, T. R.; SÁNCHEZ-MORENO, S.;FERRIS, H. Soil food webs and carbon dynamics in response to conservation tillagein California. Soil Biology and Bioch<strong>em</strong>istry, v. 71, n. 3, 952-963, 2007.MITCHELL, C.C.; WESTERMAN, R.L.; BROWN, J.R.; PECK, T.R. Overview <strong>of</strong> longtermagronomic research. Agronomy Journal, n. 83, p. 24-29, 1991.NAKAMURA, Y.; MORIYA, K.; IIZUMA, Y.; YAMAGUCHI, H. Comparisons betweenthe enchytraeid worm populations in tilled and non tilled plots <strong>of</strong> upland rice.Pedobiologia, v. 31, p. 141–146, 1988.NEHER, D.A.; CAMPBELL, C.L. N<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong> communities and microbial biomass insoil with annual and perennial crops. Applied Soil Ecology, v. 1, p. 17-28, 1994.
NICHOLAS, W. L. The biology <strong>of</strong> free-living n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s. Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 1975.NILES, R. K.; FRECKMAN, D. W. From thee ground up: n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong> ecology inbioassessment and ecosyst<strong>em</strong> health. In: BARTELS, J.M. (Ed.). Plant andn<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong> interactions. Madison: ASA:CSSA:SSSA, p. 65-85, 1998.NEHER, D.A. Role <strong>of</strong> n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s in soil health and their use as indicators. Journal <strong>of</strong>N<strong>em</strong>atology, v. 33, n. 4, p. 161-168, 2001.NORTON, D.C. Communities. In: NORTON, D.C. Ecology <strong>of</strong> plant-parasiticn<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s. New York: John Wiley, p. 59-79, 1978.OKADA, H.; HARADA, H. Effects <strong>of</strong> tillage and fertilizer on n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong> communities ina Japanese soybean Field. Applied Soil Ecology, v. 35, p. 582–598, 2007OLIVEIRA, G.C.; DIAS JUNIOR, M.S.; RESCK, D.V.S.; CURI, N. Caracterizaçãoquímica e físico-hídrica <strong>de</strong> um Latossolo Vermelho após vinte anos <strong>de</strong> manejo ecultivo do solo. Revista Brasileira <strong>de</strong> Ciência do Solo, v. 28, p. 327-336, 2004.OU, W.; LIANG, W. J.; JIANG, Y.; LI, Q.; WEN, D. Vertical distribution <strong>of</strong> soiln<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s un<strong>de</strong>r different land use types in an aquic brown soil. Pedobiologia, v.49, p. 139–148, 2005.OVERSTREET, L. F.; HOYT, G. D.; IMBRIANI, J. Comparing n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong> an<strong>de</strong>arthworm communities un<strong>de</strong>r combinations <strong>of</strong> conventional and conservationvegetable production practices. Soil & Tillage Research, v. 110, p. 42–50, 2010.PEN-MOURATOV, S.; HE, X. L.; STEINBERGER, Y.. Spatial distribution and trophicdiversity <strong>of</strong> n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong> populations un<strong>de</strong>r Acacia raddiana along a t<strong>em</strong>peraturegradient in the Negev Desert ecosyst<strong>em</strong>. Journal <strong>of</strong> Arid Environments, v. 56, p.339–355, 2004.PORAZINSKA, D.L.; DUNCAN, L.W.; MCSORLEY, R.; GRAHAM, J.H. N<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>communities as indicators <strong>of</strong> status and process <strong>of</strong> a soil ecossyst<strong>em</strong> influencied byagricultural managment practices. Applied Soil Ecology, v. 13, p. 69-86, 1988.RANGEL, O.J.P.; SILVA, C.A. Estoques <strong>de</strong> carbono e nitrogênio e frações orgânicas<strong>de</strong> latossolo submetido a diferentes sist<strong>em</strong>as <strong>de</strong> uso e manejo. Revista Brasileira<strong>de</strong> Ciência do Solo, v. 31, p. 1609-1623, 2007.RHEINHEIMER, D.S.; KAMINSKI, J.; LUPATINI, G.C.; SANTOS, E.J.S.Modificações<strong>em</strong> atributos químicos <strong>de</strong> solo arenoso sob sist<strong>em</strong>a <strong>de</strong> plantio direto. RevistaBrasileira <strong>de</strong> Ciência do Solo, v. 22, p. 713-721, 1998.91
- Page 2 and 3:
GIOVANI DE OLIVEIRA ARIEIRADIVERSID
- Page 4 and 5:
GIOVANI DE OLIVEIRA ARIEIRADIVERSID
- Page 6 and 7:
AGRADECIMENTOSAgradeço primeiramen
- Page 8 and 9:
What gets us into trouble is not wh
- Page 10 and 11:
ARIEIRA, Giovani de Oliveira. Nemat
- Page 12 and 13:
LISTA DE TABELASTabela 2.1 Hábitos
- Page 14 and 15:
SUMÁRIO1 INTRODUÇÃO ............
- Page 16 and 17:
14em sistemas agrícolas. São orga
- Page 18 and 19:
16hipóteses ecológicas sobre porq
- Page 20 and 21:
18de leguminosas por Rhizobium sp.,
- Page 22 and 23:
20crescimento microbiano; nematoide
- Page 24 and 25:
222.1.4 Nematoides de vida livreOs
- Page 26 and 27:
24b) DiversidadeUma primeira medida
- Page 28 and 29:
26baseado na sua taxa de reproduç
- Page 30 and 31:
28os valores c-p das famílias de n
- Page 32 and 33:
30BONGERS, 1999).Se a primeira etap
- Page 34 and 35:
32representam enriquecimento, estru
- Page 36 and 37:
342.2 MANEJO DOS SOLOSO solo é um
- Page 38 and 39:
36(SILVA et al., 2005).2.3.1 Prepar
- Page 40 and 41:
38crescente, tanto por parte dos pe
- Page 42 and 43: 40Stone e Silveira (2001) também a
- Page 44 and 45: 423. ARTIGO A: DIVERSIDADE TAXONÔM
- Page 46 and 47: 44abundances occurred in the topsoi
- Page 48 and 49: 46rotação de culturas incluindo c
- Page 50 and 51: 48perfil do solo é afetada pelo us
- Page 52 and 53: 50Tabela 3.2. Abundância relativa
- Page 54 and 55: 52Nas áreas de rotação, também
- Page 56 and 57: 54Entre as parcelas agrícolas, hou
- Page 58 and 59: 56no sistems DiCr em rotação de c
- Page 60 and 61: 58sistemas DiCr e Di, ambos em rota
- Page 62 and 63: 60em comparação à utilização d
- Page 64 and 65: 62Em relação aos efeitos dos cult
- Page 66 and 67: 64com baixa ocorrência de nematoid
- Page 68 and 69: 66do solo, assim como a disponibili
- Page 70 and 71: 68Tukey a 5% de significância foi
- Page 72 and 73: 70partir de 10cm. Isso pode ser jus
- Page 74 and 75: 72Considerando-se os índices utili
- Page 76 and 77: 74Tabela 4.4. Índice de Parasitas
- Page 78 and 79: 76Figura 4.2. Perfil faunal (EI X S
- Page 80 and 81: 78Figura 4.3. Análise de Component
- Page 82 and 83: 80Figura 4.4. Análise de Agrupamen
- Page 84 and 85: 825 CONCLUSÕES GERAISOs nematoides
- Page 86 and 87: 84BAUDER, J.W.; RANDAL, G.W.; SWAN,
- Page 88 and 89: 86DE GOEDE, R.G.M.; VAN DIJK, T.S.
- Page 90 and 91: 88GOSECO, C.G.; FERRIS, V.R.; FERRI
- Page 95 and 96: 93STONE, L.F.; SILVEIRA, P.M. Efeit
- Page 97 and 98: YEATES, G.W. Effects of plants on n
- Page 99 and 100: 97ANEXO AVegetaçãonativaParcelasa
Change language