94WARDLE, D. A.; BONNER, K. I.; BARKER, G. M.; YEATES, G. W.; NICHOLSON, K.S.; BARDGETT, R. D.; WATSON, R. N.; GHANI, A. Plant r<strong>em</strong>ovals in perennialgrassland: vegetation dynamics, <strong>de</strong>composers, soil biodiversity, and ecosyst<strong>em</strong>properties. Ecological Monographs, v. 69, p. 535–568, 1999.WARDLE, D. A, Impacts <strong>of</strong> disturbance on <strong>de</strong>tritus food webs in agro-ecosyst<strong>em</strong>s <strong>of</strong>contrasting tillage and weed manag<strong>em</strong>ent practices. In: BEGON, M.; FITTER, A. H.Advances in Ecological Research. New York: Aca<strong>de</strong>mic Press, p. 105 – 185, 1995.WARDLE, D.A.; YEATES, G.W. The dual importance and predation as regulatoryforces in terrestrial ecosyst<strong>em</strong>s: evi<strong>de</strong>nce from <strong>de</strong>composer food-webs. Oceologia,v. 93, n. 2, p. 303-306, 1993.WASILEWSKA, L. Soil invertebrates as bioindicators, with special reference to soilinhabitingn<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s. Russian Journal <strong>of</strong> N<strong>em</strong>atology, v. 5, p. 113-126, 1997.WASILEWSKA, L. The effect <strong>of</strong> age <strong>of</strong> meadows on succession and diversity in soiln<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong> communities. Pedobiologia, v. 38, n. 1, p. 1-11, 1994.WHITFORD, W.G.; FRECKMAN, D.W.; SANTOS, P.F.; ELKINS, N.Z.; PARKER,L.W. The role <strong>of</strong> n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s in <strong>de</strong>composition in <strong>de</strong>sert ecosyst<strong>em</strong>s. In: FRECKMAN,D.W. (Ed.) N<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s in soil ecosyst<strong>em</strong>s. Austin: University <strong>of</strong> Texas Press, p.98-116, 1982.WYSS, U. Feeding behaviour <strong>of</strong> plant-parasitic n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s. In: LEE, D.L. TheBiology <strong>of</strong> n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s. Taylor & Francis. p.233-259. 2002.YEATES, G.W. Feeding in free-living n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s: a functional approach. In: PERRY,R.N.; Wright, D.J (Ed.) The physiology and bioch<strong>em</strong>istry <strong>of</strong> free living and plantparasiticn<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s. Wallingford: CABI, p. 245-2269, 1998.YEATES, G. W. Populations <strong>of</strong> n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong> genera in soils un<strong>de</strong>r pasture. III. verticaldistribution at eleven sites. New Zealand Journal <strong>of</strong> Agricultural Research, v. 23,p.117–128, 1980.YEATES, G.W.; BOAG, B. Growth and life histories in N<strong>em</strong>atoda, with particularreference to environmental factors. N<strong>em</strong>atology, v. 5, n. 5, p. 653-664, 2003.YEATES, G.W.; BOAG, B. F<strong>em</strong>ale size shows similar trends in all cla<strong>de</strong>s <strong>of</strong> thephylum N<strong>em</strong>atoda. N<strong>em</strong>atology, v. 8, n. 1, p. 111-127, 2006.YEATES, G.W.; BONGERS, T. N<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong> diversity in agroecosyst<strong>em</strong>s. Agriculture,Ecosyst<strong>em</strong>s and Environment, v. 74, 113-135, 1999.YEATES, G. W.; BONGERS, T.; DE GOEDE, R. G. M.; FRECKMAN, D. W.;GEORGIEVA, S. S. Feeding habits in n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s families – an outline for soilecologists. Journal <strong>of</strong> N<strong>em</strong>atology, v.25, p.315-331, 1993.
YEATES, G.W. Effects <strong>of</strong> plants on n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong> community structure. Annual Review<strong>of</strong> Phytopathology, v. 37, p. 127-149, 1999.YEATES, G.W.; FERRIS, H.; MOENS, T.; VAN DER PUTTEN, W.H. The role <strong>of</strong>n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s in ecosyst<strong>em</strong>s. In: WILSON, M.J.; KAKOULI-DUARTE, T. N<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s asenvironmental indicators. Wallingford: CABI, p. 1-44, 2009.YEATES, G.W.; KING, K.L. Soil n<strong>em</strong>ato<strong>de</strong>s as indicators <strong>of</strong> the effect <strong>of</strong>manag<strong>em</strong>ent on grasslands in the New England Tablelands (NSW): comparison <strong>of</strong>native and improved grasslands. Pedobiologia, v. 41, p. 526-536, 1997.ZINN, Y.L.; LAL, R. RESCK, D.V.S. Changes in soil organic carbon stocks un<strong>de</strong>ragriculture in Brazil. Soil Tillage Research, v. 84, p. 28-40, 2005.95
- Page 2 and 3:
GIOVANI DE OLIVEIRA ARIEIRADIVERSID
- Page 4 and 5:
GIOVANI DE OLIVEIRA ARIEIRADIVERSID
- Page 6 and 7:
AGRADECIMENTOSAgradeço primeiramen
- Page 8 and 9:
What gets us into trouble is not wh
- Page 10 and 11:
ARIEIRA, Giovani de Oliveira. Nemat
- Page 12 and 13:
LISTA DE TABELASTabela 2.1 Hábitos
- Page 14 and 15:
SUMÁRIO1 INTRODUÇÃO ............
- Page 16 and 17:
14em sistemas agrícolas. São orga
- Page 18 and 19:
16hipóteses ecológicas sobre porq
- Page 20 and 21:
18de leguminosas por Rhizobium sp.,
- Page 22 and 23:
20crescimento microbiano; nematoide
- Page 24 and 25:
222.1.4 Nematoides de vida livreOs
- Page 26 and 27:
24b) DiversidadeUma primeira medida
- Page 28 and 29:
26baseado na sua taxa de reproduç
- Page 30 and 31:
28os valores c-p das famílias de n
- Page 32 and 33:
30BONGERS, 1999).Se a primeira etap
- Page 34 and 35:
32representam enriquecimento, estru
- Page 36 and 37:
342.2 MANEJO DOS SOLOSO solo é um
- Page 38 and 39:
36(SILVA et al., 2005).2.3.1 Prepar
- Page 40 and 41:
38crescente, tanto por parte dos pe
- Page 42 and 43:
40Stone e Silveira (2001) também a
- Page 44 and 45:
423. ARTIGO A: DIVERSIDADE TAXONÔM
- Page 46 and 47: 44abundances occurred in the topsoi
- Page 48 and 49: 46rotação de culturas incluindo c
- Page 50 and 51: 48perfil do solo é afetada pelo us
- Page 52 and 53: 50Tabela 3.2. Abundância relativa
- Page 54 and 55: 52Nas áreas de rotação, também
- Page 56 and 57: 54Entre as parcelas agrícolas, hou
- Page 58 and 59: 56no sistems DiCr em rotação de c
- Page 60 and 61: 58sistemas DiCr e Di, ambos em rota
- Page 62 and 63: 60em comparação à utilização d
- Page 64 and 65: 62Em relação aos efeitos dos cult
- Page 66 and 67: 64com baixa ocorrência de nematoid
- Page 68 and 69: 66do solo, assim como a disponibili
- Page 70 and 71: 68Tukey a 5% de significância foi
- Page 72 and 73: 70partir de 10cm. Isso pode ser jus
- Page 74 and 75: 72Considerando-se os índices utili
- Page 76 and 77: 74Tabela 4.4. Índice de Parasitas
- Page 78 and 79: 76Figura 4.2. Perfil faunal (EI X S
- Page 80 and 81: 78Figura 4.3. Análise de Component
- Page 82 and 83: 80Figura 4.4. Análise de Agrupamen
- Page 84 and 85: 825 CONCLUSÕES GERAISOs nematoides
- Page 86 and 87: 84BAUDER, J.W.; RANDAL, G.W.; SWAN,
- Page 88 and 89: 86DE GOEDE, R.G.M.; VAN DIJK, T.S.
- Page 90 and 91: 88GOSECO, C.G.; FERRIS, V.R.; FERRI
- Page 92 and 93: 90MANACHINI, B.; CORSINI, A.; BOCCH
- Page 95: 93STONE, L.F.; SILVEIRA, P.M. Efeit
- Page 99 and 100: 97ANEXO AVegetaçãonativaParcelasa
Change language