Patientperspektivet på læge-patientrelationen i ... - Dagens Medicin

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Samlet litteraturliste Adams, R. J., Smith, B. J., & Ruffin, R. E. 2001. Patient preferences for autonomy in decision making in asthma management. Thorax, 56(2): 126-132. Alvesson, M. & Sköldberg, K. 1994. Tolkning och reflektion: vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod. Lund: Studentlitteratur. Andersen, I. 1992. Om kunsten at bedrive feltstudier. En erfaringsbaseret forskningsmetodik. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur. Arborelius, E. 1992. Patients comment on video-recorded consultations - the "good" GP and the "bad". Scand J Soc Med, 12(4): 213-216. Arborelius, E. & Bremberg, S. 1992. What does a Human Relationship with the doctor mean? Scand J Prim Health Care, 10(3): 163-169. Ashworth P. 2003. The origins of qualitative psychology. In Smith JA (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology. A practical guide to research methods.: 4-24. London: SAGE. Baker, R., Boulton, M., Windridge, K., Tarrant, C., Bankart, J., & Freeman, G. K. 2007. Interpersonal continuity of care: a cross-sectional survey of primary care patients' preferences and their experiences. Brit J Gen Pract, 57(537): 283-289. Baker, R., Mainous III, A. G., Gray, D. P., & Love, M. M. 2003. Exploration of the relationship between continuity, trust in regular doctors and patient satisfaction with consultations with family doctors. Scand J Prim Health Care, 21(1): 27-32. Barnett, J., Ogden, J., & Daniells, E. 2008. The value of choice: a qualitative study. Brit J Gen Pract, 58(554): 609-613. Beck, U. 2004. Risikosamfundet. På vej mod en ny modernitet. København: Hans Reitzel. Bensing, J. M., Tromp, F., Dulmen, Sv., Brink-Muinen, Av., Verheul, W., & Schellevis, F. G. 2006. Shifts in doctor-patient communication between 1986 and 2002: a study of videotaped General Practice consultations with hypertension patients. BMC Fam Pract, 7(62). 122
Bensing, J. M., Verhaak, P. F. M., van Dulmen, A. M., & Visser, A. P. 2000. Communication: the royal pathway to patient-centered medicine. Patient Educ Couns, 39(1): 1-3. Berry, L. L., Parish, J. T., Janakiraman, R., Ogburn-Russell, L., Couchman, G. R., Rayburn, W. L., & Grisel, J. 2008. Patients' commitment to their primary physician and why it matters. Ann Fam Med, 6(1): 6-13. Bjorkman, M. & Malterud, K. 2007. Being lesbian - does the doctor need to know? A qualitative study about the significance of disclosure in general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care, 25(1): 58- 62. Boulton, M., Tarrant, C., Windridge, K., Baker, R., & Freeman, G. K. 2006a. How are different types of continuity achieved? A mixed methods longitudinal study. Brit J Gen Pract, 56(531): 749- 755. Boulton, M., Tarrant, C., Windridge, K., Baker, R., & Freeman, G. K. 2006b. How are different types of continuity achieved? A mixed methods longitudinal study. Brit J Gen Pract, 56(531): 749- 755. Bowlby, J. 1979. The Making and Breaking of Affectional Bonds. London: Routledge. Bowlby, J. 1988. A secure base. London: Routledge. Bowlby, J. 2006. At knytte og bryde nære bånd: tilknytning og tab, selvtillid og sorg. Frederiksberg: Det lille Forlag. Bråten, S. 2004. Kommunikasjon og samspill: fra fødsel til alderdom. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. Broberg, A. 2008. Tilknytningsteori: betydningen af nære følelsesmæssige relationer. København: Hans Reitzel. Bundgaard, B. 2006. Barbie og Ken går til <strong>læge</strong>n. Ugeskr Læger, 168(46, Tillæg): 15-16. Buszewicz, M., Pistrang, N., Barker, C., Cape, J., & Martin, J. 2006. Patients' experiences of GP consultations for psychological problems: a qualitative study. Brit J Gen Pract, 56(528): 496-503. 123
Page 1 and 2:
Ph.d.-afhandling Patientperspektive
Page 3 and 4:
BILAG 1 ...........................
Page 5 and 6:
Tak til alle de gode kollegaer på
Page 7 and 8:
jo mere brug for omsorg fra en fast
Page 9 and 10:
of autonomy. It was valuable to the
Page 11 and 12:
forbrugerorienterede, og hvad indeb
Page 13 and 14:
listesystem, men i Danmark skal pat
Page 15 and 16:
elationel kontinuitet (dvs. patient
Page 17 and 18:
nødvendigt at starte analysen i in
Page 19 and 20:
identitetsopfattelse (46:90). Samfu
Page 21 and 22:
1.5.2. Udviklingspsykologisk teori
Page 23 and 24:
Kapitel 2. Materiale og metode Dett
Page 25 and 26:
Læge 1 Læge 2 Læge 3 Læge 4 Læ
Page 27 and 28:
Fiktivt navn på patient (pt.) Pt.
Page 29 and 30:
2.3. Udformning af interviewet Det
Page 31 and 32:
ikke tale om en detaljeret sproglig
Page 33 and 34:
evægelse. Abduktion kombinerer en
Page 35 and 36:
Trin 2: Analyse af mening Ved trin
Page 37 and 38:
Tema: krænkelse: ”Ikke at blive
Page 39 and 40:
3.2. I hvilken grad ønsker patient
Page 41 and 42:
Kapitel 4. Diskussion I det følgen
Page 43 and 44:
præciseret, at en god læge-patien
Page 45 and 46:
En undersøgelse publiceret i 2007
Page 47 and 48:
4.1.3. Behov for tilknytning i læg
Page 49 and 50:
forekom heller ikke rationelt, at d
Page 51 and 52:
hvilket andre studier før har vist
Page 53 and 54:
4.2. Diskussion af metode I det fø
Page 55 and 56:
Adskillelsen mellem interviewfase o
Page 57 and 58:
interviewpersonen, 2) af offentligh
Page 59 and 60:
som de for analysen mest relevante,
Page 61 and 62:
jævnbyrdige forhold mellem lægen
Page 63 and 64:
Litteraturliste (1) National strate
Page 65 and 66:
(26) Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman
Page 67 and 68:
(48) Christoffersen SA. Profesjonse
Page 69 and 70:
(71) Lewis JR. Patient views on qua
Page 71 and 72: (94) Bensing JM, Tromp F, Dulmen Sv
Page 73 and 74: (116) Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Ru
Page 75 and 76: Bilag 1-5 Bilag 1 Information til p
Page 77 and 78: Bilag 3 Interviewguide Husk info om
Page 79 and 80: Bilag 4 Den semistrukturerede inter
Page 81 and 82: Appendiks 1-3 Appendiks 1: Artikel
Page 83 and 84: Background Continuity of care has t
Page 85 and 86: Results The analysis showed two cor
Page 87 and 88: ecause you can‟t do that at my ag
Page 89 and 90: they remember you, they know what i
Page 91 and 92: Discussion Summary of main findings
Page 93 and 94: diseases. The unsatisfactory doctor
Page 95 and 96: 7. Windridge K, Tarrant C, Freeman
Page 97 and 98: 29. Johnston O, Kumar S, Kendall K,
Page 99 and 100: Interview guide 1. Personal informa
Page 101 and 102: 101
Page 103 and 104: 103
Page 105 and 106: 105
Page 107 and 108: Appendiks 3: Artikel 3 Attachment i
Page 109 and 110: Abstract Objective. To explore why
Page 111 and 112: A phenomenological approach called
Page 113 and 114: ”If it relates to my back, and so
Page 115 and 116: attachment theory: when you are sic
Page 117 and 118: Acknowledgements We are very gratef
Page 119 and 120: [16] Bowlby J. The Making and Break
Page 121: [35] Heath I, Nessa J. Objectificat
Page 125 and 126: Det Etiske Råd. 2003. Læge-patien
Page 127 and 128: Hantho, A., Jensen, L., & Malterud,
Page 129 and 130: Lewis, J. R. 1994. Patient Views on
Page 131 and 132: Ogden, J., Daniells, E., & Barnett,
Page 133 and 134: Smith, J. A. & Osborn Mike 2003. In
Page 135: Willaing, I., Folmann, N. B., & Gis
show all

Patientperspektivet på læge-patientrelationen i ... - Dagens Medicin

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?