- Page 1 and 2: Ph.d.-afhandling Patientperspektive
- Page 3 and 4: BILAG 1 ...........................
- Page 5 and 6: Tak til alle de gode kollegaer på
- Page 7: jo mere brug for omsorg fra en fast
- Page 11 and 12: forbrugerorienterede, og hvad indeb
- Page 13 and 14: listesystem, men i Danmark skal pat
- Page 15 and 16: elationel kontinuitet (dvs. patient
- Page 17 and 18: nødvendigt at starte analysen i in
- Page 19 and 20: identitetsopfattelse (46:90). Samfu
- Page 21 and 22: 1.5.2. Udviklingspsykologisk teori
- Page 23 and 24: Kapitel 2. Materiale og metode Dett
- Page 25 and 26: Læge 1 Læge 2 Læge 3 Læge 4 Læ
- Page 27 and 28: Fiktivt navn på patient (pt.) Pt.
- Page 29 and 30: 2.3. Udformning af interviewet Det
- Page 31 and 32: ikke tale om en detaljeret sproglig
- Page 33 and 34: evægelse. Abduktion kombinerer en
- Page 35 and 36: Trin 2: Analyse af mening Ved trin
- Page 37 and 38: Tema: krænkelse: ”Ikke at blive
- Page 39 and 40: 3.2. I hvilken grad ønsker patient
- Page 41 and 42: Kapitel 4. Diskussion I det følgen
- Page 43 and 44: præciseret, at en god læge-patien
- Page 45 and 46: En undersøgelse publiceret i 2007
- Page 47 and 48: 4.1.3. Behov for tilknytning i læg
- Page 49 and 50: forekom heller ikke rationelt, at d
- Page 51 and 52: hvilket andre studier før har vist
- Page 53 and 54: 4.2. Diskussion af metode I det fø
- Page 55 and 56: Adskillelsen mellem interviewfase o
- Page 57 and 58: interviewpersonen, 2) af offentligh
- Page 59 and 60:
som de for analysen mest relevante,
- Page 61 and 62:
jævnbyrdige forhold mellem lægen
- Page 63 and 64:
Litteraturliste (1) National strate
- Page 65 and 66:
(26) Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman
- Page 67 and 68:
(48) Christoffersen SA. Profesjonse
- Page 69 and 70:
(71) Lewis JR. Patient views on qua
- Page 71 and 72:
(94) Bensing JM, Tromp F, Dulmen Sv
- Page 73 and 74:
(116) Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Ru
- Page 75 and 76:
Bilag 1-5 Bilag 1 Information til p
- Page 77 and 78:
Bilag 3 Interviewguide Husk info om
- Page 79 and 80:
Bilag 4 Den semistrukturerede inter
- Page 81 and 82:
Appendiks 1-3 Appendiks 1: Artikel
- Page 83 and 84:
Background Continuity of care has t
- Page 85 and 86:
Results The analysis showed two cor
- Page 87 and 88:
ecause you can‟t do that at my ag
- Page 89 and 90:
they remember you, they know what i
- Page 91 and 92:
Discussion Summary of main findings
- Page 93 and 94:
diseases. The unsatisfactory doctor
- Page 95 and 96:
7. Windridge K, Tarrant C, Freeman
- Page 97 and 98:
29. Johnston O, Kumar S, Kendall K,
- Page 99 and 100:
Interview guide 1. Personal informa
- Page 101 and 102:
101
- Page 103 and 104:
103
- Page 105 and 106:
105
- Page 107 and 108:
Appendiks 3: Artikel 3 Attachment i
- Page 109 and 110:
Abstract Objective. To explore why
- Page 111 and 112:
A phenomenological approach called
- Page 113 and 114:
”If it relates to my back, and so
- Page 115 and 116:
attachment theory: when you are sic
- Page 117 and 118:
Acknowledgements We are very gratef
- Page 119 and 120:
[16] Bowlby J. The Making and Break
- Page 121 and 122:
[35] Heath I, Nessa J. Objectificat
- Page 123 and 124:
Bensing, J. M., Verhaak, P. F. M.,
- Page 125 and 126:
Det Etiske Råd. 2003. Læge-patien
- Page 127 and 128:
Hantho, A., Jensen, L., & Malterud,
- Page 129 and 130:
Lewis, J. R. 1994. Patient Views on
- Page 131 and 132:
Ogden, J., Daniells, E., & Barnett,
- Page 133 and 134:
Smith, J. A. & Osborn Mike 2003. In
- Page 135:
Willaing, I., Folmann, N. B., & Gis