Patientperspektivet på læge-patientrelationen i ... - Dagens Medicin

More documents

Recommendations

Info

(13) Sundhedsloven. 2. udgave ed. Albertslund: Schultz Information; 2008. (14) Tjora A. Den moderne pasienten i sosiologisk lys. In: Tjora A, editor. Den moderne pasienten. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2008. p. 11-33. (15) Beck U. Risikosamfundet. På vej mod en ny modernitet. København: Hans Reitzel; 2004. (16) Lorig K. Partnerships between expert patients and physicians. Lancet 2002;359(9309):814-5. (17) Willaing I, Folmann NB, Gisselbæk AB. Patientskoler og gruppebaseret patientundervisning: en litteraturgennemgang med fokus <strong>på</strong> metoder og effekter. København: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 2005. (18) Kleinman A. The illness narratives: suffering, healing, and the human condition. New York: Basic Books; 1998. (19) Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med 2000;51(7):1087-110. (20) McWhinney IR. Primary care: core values - Core values in a changing world. BMJ 1998;316(7147):1807-9. (21) Bensing JM, Verhaak PFM, van Dulmen AM, Visser AP. Communication: the royal pathway to patient-centered medicine. Patient Educ Couns 2000;39(1):1-3. (22) Hantho A, Jensen L, Malterud K. Mutual understanding: a communication model for general practice. Scand J Prim Health Care 2002;20(4):244-51. (23) Almen praksis i fremtidens sundhedsvæsen: resumeer af delrapporterne. København: Danske Regioner; 2007. (24) Olesen F, Dickinson J, Hjortdahl P. General practice - time for a new definition. BMJ 2000;320(7231):354-7. (25) Freeman GK, Olesen F, Hjortdahl P. Continuity of care: an essential element of modern general practice? Fam Pract 2003;20(6):623-7. 64
(26) Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ 2003;327(7425):1219-21. (27) Freeman G. Up close and personal? Continuing pressure on the doctor-patient relationship in the QOF era. Brit J Gen Pract 2006;56(528):483-4. (28) Schers H, Webster S, van den Hoogen H, Avery A, Grol R, van den Bosch W. Continuity of care in general practice: a survey of patients' views. Brit J Gen Pract 2002;52(479):459- 62. (29) Saultz JW. Defining and measuring interpersonal continuity of care. Ann Fam Med 2003;1(3):134. (30) Saultz JW, Albedaiwi W. Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: A critical review. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(5):445-51. (31) Pandhi N, Saultz JW. Patients' perceptions of interpersonal continuity of care. J Am Board Fam Med 2006;19(4):390-7. (32) von Bultzingslowen I, Eliasson G, Sarvimaki A, Mattsson B, Hjortdahl P. Patients' views on interpersonal continuity in primary care: a sense of security based on four core foundations. Fam Pract 2006;23(2):210-9. (33) Naithani S, Gulliford M, Morgan M. Patients' perceptions and experiences of continuity of care in diabetes. Health Expect 2006;9(2):118-29. (34) Buszewicz M, Pistrang N, Barker C, Cape J, Martin J. Patients' experiences of GP consultations for psychological problems: a qualitative study. Brit J Gen Pract 2006;56(528):496-503. (35) Tarrant C, Windridge K, Boulton M, Baker R, Freeman G. "He treats you as a person not just like a number" - How important is personal care in general practice? BMJ 2003;326(7402):1310-2. 65
Page 1 and 2:
Ph.d.-afhandling Patientperspektive
Page 3 and 4:
BILAG 1 ...........................
Page 5 and 6:
Tak til alle de gode kollegaer på
Page 7 and 8:
jo mere brug for omsorg fra en fast
Page 9 and 10:
of autonomy. It was valuable to the
Page 11 and 12:
forbrugerorienterede, og hvad indeb
Page 13 and 14: listesystem, men i Danmark skal pat
Page 15 and 16: elationel kontinuitet (dvs. patient
Page 17 and 18: nødvendigt at starte analysen i in
Page 19 and 20: identitetsopfattelse (46:90). Samfu
Page 21 and 22: 1.5.2. Udviklingspsykologisk teori
Page 23 and 24: Kapitel 2. Materiale og metode Dett
Page 25 and 26: Læge 1 Læge 2 Læge 3 Læge 4 Læ
Page 27 and 28: Fiktivt navn på patient (pt.) Pt.
Page 29 and 30: 2.3. Udformning af interviewet Det
Page 31 and 32: ikke tale om en detaljeret sproglig
Page 33 and 34: evægelse. Abduktion kombinerer en
Page 35 and 36: Trin 2: Analyse af mening Ved trin
Page 37 and 38: Tema: krænkelse: ”Ikke at blive
Page 39 and 40: 3.2. I hvilken grad ønsker patient
Page 41 and 42: Kapitel 4. Diskussion I det følgen
Page 43 and 44: præciseret, at en god læge-patien
Page 45 and 46: En undersøgelse publiceret i 2007
Page 47 and 48: 4.1.3. Behov for tilknytning i læg
Page 49 and 50: forekom heller ikke rationelt, at d
Page 51 and 52: hvilket andre studier før har vist
Page 53 and 54: 4.2. Diskussion af metode I det fø
Page 55 and 56: Adskillelsen mellem interviewfase o
Page 57 and 58: interviewpersonen, 2) af offentligh
Page 59 and 60: som de for analysen mest relevante,
Page 61 and 62: jævnbyrdige forhold mellem lægen
Page 63: Litteraturliste (1) National strate
Page 67 and 68: (48) Christoffersen SA. Profesjonse
Page 69 and 70: (71) Lewis JR. Patient views on qua
Page 71 and 72: (94) Bensing JM, Tromp F, Dulmen Sv
Page 73 and 74: (116) Ciechanowski PS, Katon WJ, Ru
Page 75 and 76: Bilag 1-5 Bilag 1 Information til p
Page 77 and 78: Bilag 3 Interviewguide Husk info om
Page 79 and 80: Bilag 4 Den semistrukturerede inter
Page 81 and 82: Appendiks 1-3 Appendiks 1: Artikel
Page 83 and 84: Background Continuity of care has t
Page 85 and 86: Results The analysis showed two cor
Page 87 and 88: ecause you can‟t do that at my ag
Page 89 and 90: they remember you, they know what i
Page 91 and 92: Discussion Summary of main findings
Page 93 and 94: diseases. The unsatisfactory doctor
Page 95 and 96: 7. Windridge K, Tarrant C, Freeman
Page 97 and 98: 29. Johnston O, Kumar S, Kendall K,
Page 99 and 100: Interview guide 1. Personal informa
Page 101 and 102: 101
Page 103 and 104: 103
Page 105 and 106: 105
Page 107 and 108: Appendiks 3: Artikel 3 Attachment i
Page 109 and 110: Abstract Objective. To explore why
Page 111 and 112: A phenomenological approach called
Page 113 and 114: ”If it relates to my back, and so
Page 115 and 116:
attachment theory: when you are sic
Page 117 and 118:
Acknowledgements We are very gratef
Page 119 and 120:
[16] Bowlby J. The Making and Break
Page 121 and 122:
[35] Heath I, Nessa J. Objectificat
Page 123 and 124:
Bensing, J. M., Verhaak, P. F. M.,
Page 125 and 126:
Det Etiske Råd. 2003. Læge-patien
Page 127 and 128:
Hantho, A., Jensen, L., & Malterud,
Page 129 and 130:
Lewis, J. R. 1994. Patient Views on
Page 131 and 132:
Ogden, J., Daniells, E., & Barnett,
Page 133 and 134:
Smith, J. A. & Osborn Mike 2003. In
Page 135:
Willaing, I., Folmann, N. B., & Gis
show all

Patientperspektivet på læge-patientrelationen i ... - Dagens Medicin

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?